Re: Figure out what killed an app (rhbz#2253099)

On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 16:20 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 14:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > Running with rtkit-daemon stoped and masked prevents the main evo > > > process being prioritized and consequently killed with higher load. > > > > > > The fact that the k

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:12 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Steve Cossette wrote: > > But to be fair as well, that doesn't exist on Windows (Windows can > > reopen the programs you are working on but it doesn't save what you were > > doing) > > And even that, it does not do automatically, it

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ it. you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , when many people , members of Fedora on devel mailing list, express that they want have X11 , in fact we have m

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2024-02-09 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/ -- ___ devel ma

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-02-09 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: * The status of and assigning tasks for the EL10 fork > Source: htt

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On 2/8/24 05:44 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: The Wayland protocol in question is this one: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/18 That said, even X11's version isn't widely supported. Typically, support for this is plumbed through linking libSM, and GTK notably doe

Feedback requested on potential change to hosts line in nsswitch.conf

Hi, If you're interested in name resolution or mDNS, please review this bug report: Default authselect profiles break `hostname --fqdn` https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257197 We are looking for feedback on whether to move nss-myhostname, and possibly also nss-mdns4_minimal. I

January 2024 Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi all, I have just pushed a new years' release of Fedora Developer Portal. It's minor, a thanks to the contributors that helped with reviews/fixes nonetheless. Revitalize web-app section about Rails. (#498) * https://developer.fedoraproject.org/start/sw/web-app/rails.html mention nodenv for

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thursday, 8 February 2024 12:33:29 CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , Yes. And the moment this: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/issues/139 gets implemented we will not have to remove anything. (remember that the Change Proposal was approved) >

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On torsdag 8. februar 2024 19:54:58 CET Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Thursday, 8 February 2024 12:33:29 CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , > > > Yes. And the moment this: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/issues/139 > gets implemented we will

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 3 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28. Since this

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thursday, 8 February 2024 20:21:19 CET Roy Bekken wrote: > You mean the proposal from kde-sig that they wanted changing to plasma 6 and > dropping X11 because they have no interest of supporting it? > Yes. Interest *and* resources. > Don’t see why that should prevent someone else from support

OpenSSL 3.2.1 available in rawhide

Hello everyone, OpenSSL 3.2.1 is now available in rawhide [1]. There are no API/ABI changes in comparison with the last version in rawhide (3.1.4). This version (3.2.0 onwards) supports PQ algorithms that can be loaded through the OQS provider. A few tests that needed some downstream tweaks have be

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ it. > > > you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , when > many people , members of Fedora on devel m

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > One thing that seems to be overlooked in many of the posts on this thread: > > Nobody can *force* the KDE Plasma maintainers to do *anything*, just > like nobody can force *any* packager to do anything. Fedora a > volunteer-run

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 16:06 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote: > > > > Mass rebuild finished a

Heads-up: Updating llhttp to 9.2.0 in F40/Branched and F41/Rawhide

In one week, 2024-02-15, or slightly later, I plan to update llhttp to 9.2.0[1] in (what will then be) F40/Branched and F41/Rawhide. Based on the release notes[2], this release contains some bug fixes, but no security fixes or exceptionally serious bug fixes. Therefore, although this package h

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ > > > it. > > > > > > you are removing X

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

I On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > > > We are not banning nor deleting anything.

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > Yes. And the moment this: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/issues/139 > gets implemented we will not have to remove anything. Well, then kwin-x11 will also no longer depend on kwin and your argument that it is a problem because it introduces a hard version lock wil

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Fabio Valentini wrote: > Nobody can *force* the KDE Plasma maintainers to do *anything*, just > like nobody can force *any* packager to do anything. That is exactly why nobody should be allowed to force plasma-workspace-x11 and kwin-x11 out of the Fedora repository. We are not forcing the KDE Pl

Re: OpenSSL 3.2.1 available in rawhide

On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:37 +0100, Sahana Prasad wrote: > Hello everyone, > OpenSSL 3.2.1 is now available in rawhide [1]. > There are no API/ABI changes in comparison with the last version in > rawhide > (3.1.4). > This version (3.2.0 onwards) supports PQ algorithms that can be > loaded > through