On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 4:30 PM Siteshwar Vashisht
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing this email to get feedback from the members of the Fedora
> development community about OpenScanHub for Fedora.
>
> # tl;dr
>
> OpenScanHub does static and dynamic analysis of rpm packages and it may be
> helpful
We don't generally use/talk about amd64 in Fedora, so I was a bit thrown by
the naming of this Change.
I don't want to start a skirmish about amd64 vs x86_64, but iiuc this
Change is not AMD specific
so by now I personally feel x86-64 actually kinda sounds more neutral in
this sense
(I am aware tha
rpmlint 2.4.0 (in Fedora 39) does not currently support the "%patch
-P1 -p1" syntax [1], and incorrectly reports that patches aren't
applied. 2.5.0 has a fix for this [2]. There's a 2.5.0 update for F39
currently in testing [3].
[1]
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/461#is
Hi All,
I posted two new packages for review. Feedback is highly appreciated :)
mk-configure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985
libmaa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257986
Some context:
I took the orphan package dictd. Dictd depends on libmaa. The dictd spec
wa
Petr Menšík wrote:
> That might create a regression in special case. If you are running by
> default systemd-resolved, it listens already on domain port on address
> 127.0.0.53 address. But if bind-interfaces or bind-dynamic is not used
> explicitly, dnsmasq will try to listen on wildcard address 0
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240112.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240113.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 28
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 87
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 185.92 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
