[Test-Announce] Fedora 40 Rawhide 20231213.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 40 Rawhide 20231213.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: OCaml 5.1.1 rebuild in Rawhide

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:28:29PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > .. is under way: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239227 > > Shouldn't take more than a day or two, with any luck! > > In terms of the new version, nothing much to see here. There a three > important regres

Mock v5.3 release

Hello maintainers! Let me announce a new Mock release v5.3, the chroot build environment manager for building RPMs. The notable change in this release is the new rpm autospec plugin (for generating %autorelease and %autochangelog "in-chroot"), and fixes for building packages using %generate_build

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231213.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231212.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231213.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 268 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.94 MiB Size of dropped packages

Intention to update httpcomponents-core and httpcomponents-client to major version 5

I will provide compat packages of version 4. Review requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2254309 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2254310 -- Marián Konček -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Anaconda Team Update: Capacity Challenges and Contribution Guidelines

Dear community, I hope this message finds you well. As the team lead for the Anaconda installer, I wanted to provide a brief update on our current status and share some important information about community contributions. Our team is currently facing capacity challenges due to a reduction in ac

Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:53:00PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > We could just have an /etc tree like we see now but in /usr/share/etc > > > (or /usr/etc, but then I get IRIX nightmares) and your local overrides > > > exist in /etc. Things like fstab will probably just have to always be > >

How to clone subpackages during koji build stage

Hi everybody! Koji mocks does not access the internet during the build stage. What are the recommendations when my project has some content inside CMake to clone subrepos to compile my code? Do you have any guidelines for this? Honestly, I tried to google it, but I'm not finding something useful

Re: How to clone subpackages during koji build stage

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:57 PM Julio Faracco wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > Koji mocks does not access the internet during the build stage. > What are the recommendations when my project has some content inside > CMake to clone subrepos to compile my code? > > Do you have any guidelines for this? H

Orphaning rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer

Hi all, This was broken by recent rubygem-rails-html-sanitizer update. The fix would be probably easy, but while this used to be needed by rubygem-rails-dom-testing (and Rails in general), it is not needed anymore. I am not even sure if upstream would care to fix this, because well, the name

Re: How to clone subpackages during koji build stage

Thanks Fabio! I presume the CMakeLists.txt of the project I'm working on needs some rebase. But first, I would like to see what is recommended before taking any action. On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 1:02 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:57 PM Julio Faracco wrote: > > > > Hi eve

Re: Intention to update httpcomponents-core and httpcomponents-client to major version 5

I don't think you need review for versioned packages: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process Unless you really want, of course. Vít Dne 13. 12. 23 v 14:29 Marián Konček napsal(a): I will provide compat packages of version 4. Rev

Erlang 26 broke rabbitmq

Lately I'm working on the Bodhi development environment, and I reached a point where I noticed rabbitmq was not working inside my current, Fedora 39-based version of it. This appears to be because rabbitmq 3.11 simply does not work with Erlang 26. Fedora 39 has erlang 26 and rabbitmq 3.11. See: h

Heads-up: updating python-ujson to 5.9.0 in Rawhide

In one week, 2023-12-20, or slightly later, I plan to update python-ujson to 5.9.0 in Fedora Rawhide[1]. A COPR impact check shows no regressions[2] (the buildstream FTBFS is pre-existing), but the upstream release notes[3] indicate two breaking changes,     - Raise `TypeError` if `toDict()` r

[CoreOS] Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-12-13

Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2023-12-13/fedora-coreos-meeting.2023-12-13-16.29.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2023-12-13/fedora-coreos-meeting.2023-12-13-16.29.log.html Text Minutes: https:/

Re: Erlang 26 broke rabbitmq

W dniu 13.12.2023 o 19:51, Adam Williamson pisze: Lately I'm working on the Bodhi development environment, and I reached a point where I noticed rabbitmq was not working inside my current, Fedora 39-based version of it. This appears to be because rabbitmq 3.11 simply does not work with Erlang 26