On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 22:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> * Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new
> release.
> * GNOME Software has a merge request open[2].
> * libadwaita has an upstream change that needs backporting[3].
> * malcontent needs work done.
Hi,
I'm sor
Hey Neal,
On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 22:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:43 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > As part of the work to upgrade to KDE Plasma 6, appstream is being
> > upgraded to a snapshot release as 1.0.0 is arriving soon. There are
> > some conseq
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:48:38 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/28/23 13:36, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I'm going to start building openmpi 5.0.0 and its requirements (pmix
> > 4.2.7, prrte 3.0.2) and dependencies in a side-tag starting tomorrow.
> > Notable changes are:
> >
> > * Dropping s
MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from source
after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I would be
unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
I think having more time to adapt dependent packages would have been helpful,
as I do not
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:34 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> * Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new
> release.
> * GNOME Software has a merge request open[2].
> * libadwaita has an upstream change that needs backporting[3].
> * malcontent needs work done.
>
> Please address the
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
David Schwörer wrote:
> MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from
> source after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I
> would be unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
>
> I think having more ti
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:18 AM Milan Crha wrote:
> I'm sorry for a late response, I forgot of this. I tried to build
> gnome-software in your side tag, but it fails due to the appstream
> packages cannot be installed together:
>
> Error: Transaction test error:
> DEBUG util.py:446:file /usr/l
Hi
Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of
months ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal
soname bump in F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x
series.
I'm preparing a gdal-3.6.2-8.really3.5.3.fc37 to address this, pl
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> David Schwörer
>
> if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> arches. The libmpi_cxx.so.40 doesn't exist at all in openmpi 5.0, so
> people on x86_64 or aar
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231107.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 3.07 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:19:23 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> > David Schwörer >
> >
> > if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> > was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> > arches. The libmpi_cxx.
Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
On 07. 11. 23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of months
ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal soname bump in
F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x series.
I'm preparing a gdal-3.6.
prrte 3.0 introduces /usr/bin/pterm which conflicts with putty. Issues:
https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/issues/1836
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247407
If anyone has any constructive comments, it would be appreciated.
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least i
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 13:13:12 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.
I can confirm we have a problem, bout++-5.1.0-1 (latest in rawhide
branch) builds OK under F-38 mock, but fails in Rawhide mock. Some
tests won't complete, like be
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> this is not the first time I saw a bodhi update that breaks dozens of
> dependencies, goes unnoticed for a week and is automatically pushed
> stable, only to discover many packages fail to install.
The most important measure would be to abolish automatic pushes. This update
Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 22:20 Uhr schrieb Michael J Gruber <
m...@fedoraproject.org>:
> jbig2dec 0.20 (a bugfix release) was released a while ago, and with the
> current ghostscript update, everything is ready for it, as can be seen in
> the copr rebuilds:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs
On 07.11.23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple
of months ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted
gdal soname bump in F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the
3.6.x series.
I'm preparing a gdal-3.6
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:12 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Can you do 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-76936 --build
> appstream0.16-0.16.3-2.fc40' and try building gnome-software again
> once it says that the package is available in the repo?
Hi,
it changed the problem to:
DEBUG util.py:446:
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:55 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:12 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Can you do 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-76936 --build
> > appstream0.16-0.16.3-2.fc40' and try building gnome-software again
> > once it says that the package is available in the repo
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:58 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It needs to be "appstream%{?_isa} >= 1.0.0~".
Hi,
I'm sorry, I do not follow. Do you mean "1.0.0" is higher than
"1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-1.fc40", but lower than "1.0.0-2.fc40"?
That sounds odd to me.
Both flatpak and gnome-software
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:58 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It needs to be "appstream%{?_isa} >= 1.0.0~".
>
> Hi,
> I'm sorry, I do not follow. Do you mean "1.0.0" is higher than
> "1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-1.fc40", but lower than "1.0.0-
On 11/7/23 08:21, Cristian Delgado wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
> moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.
>
> I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find
> the spec file
Welcome. Have taken
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Yes. So your %appstream_version macro should have "1.0.0~".
That would break the:
> >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}
because appstream-devel Provides:
pkgconfig(appstream) = 1.0.0
no? I know, I can try i
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:42 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Yes. So your %appstream_version macro should have "1.0.0~".
>
> That would break the:
>
> > >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}
>
> because appstream-devel Pr
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
Hmm, odd.
Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
it).
Thanks and bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
>
> Hmm, odd.
>
> Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
> it).
>
Taken care of it: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> we've decided to align with the Debian decision and revert this change
I read the article on LWN and parts of the Debian discussion, and I
think this is the right decision.
Zbyszek
___
de
Il 03/11/23 02:43, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> * appstream-data needs to move its content from
> /usr/share/app-info/{xmls,icons} to /usr/share/swcatalog/{xml,icons}
I think this is the third time they change path. BTW, 'app-info' was the
previous one, 0.16 used 'metainfo' [1], now 'swcatalog'... le
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:16 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 03/11/23 02:43, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> > * appstream-data needs to move its content from
> > /usr/share/app-info/{xmls,icons} to /usr/share/swcatalog/{xml,icons}
>
> I think this is the third time they change path. BTW, 'app-inf
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
> >
> > Hmm, odd.
> >
> > Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights
Fedora Linux 39 was released today [1]. The Fedora CoreOS `testing` stream has
been
rebased and is currently rolling out. In two weeks, it will be promoted to the
`stable` stream.
For more information about Fedora 39, see the Fedora Project's list of official
Changes [2] and the Fedora CoreOS ana
Hi,
I am trying to enable debug information for a programming language that
produces debuginfo in a custom (non-DWARF) format. I was thinking that
adding that programming-language-specific debuginfo to existing
-debuginfo packages seems like a good idea.
(Is that a bad idea?)
Any suggestions on
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
> > >
> > > Hmm, odd.
> > >
>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:05:13AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> prrte 3.0 introduces /usr/bin/pterm which conflicts with putty. Issues:
>
> https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/issues/1836
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247407
>
> If anyone has any constructive comments, it would
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing this email to the Fedora community to give you a heads-up about
> what we are going to do with the new change introduced to the groff 1.23.0
> version [1].
> Upstream of groff stopped mapping the special characte
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:58 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
Hi Benson,
I've made the pull request, thanks for your feedback.
Also i've also raised an issue at package sponsors, hoping someone could
sponsor me, I'll try to contact them through matrix and IRC
Thanks again
Cristian Delgado
"You can't improve until you make mistakes"
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 1
38 matches
Mail list logo
