Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686

2023-11-05 Thread Julian Sikorski
THanks! The side tags are: f40-build-side-77026 f40-build-side-77028 f38-build-side-77032 f37-build-side-77034 Best regards, Julian Am 04.11.23 um 18:10 schrieb Gwyn Ciesla via devel: I can take care of Abiword. Let me know when to do so. -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers --

Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686

2023-11-05 Thread Julian Sikorski
Correction, I had a mishap when cleaning up tags. The correct ones are: f40-build-side-77026 f39-build-side-77030 f38-build-side-77032 f37-build-side-77036 Best regards, Julian Am 05.11.23 um 10:36 schrieb Julian Sikorski: THanks! The side tags are: f40-build-side-77026 f40-build-side-77028 f38

Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686

2023-11-05 Thread Julian Sikorski
Am 04.11.23 um 18:01 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: Hello, I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to 1.12.46 today. After pushing the changes, it turned out that it no longer builds on i686 [1][2]. Given that the use on i6

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

2023-11-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:58:10AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 5:39 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:49:36AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at

Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686

2023-11-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 05:01:15PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to 1.12.46 today. > > After pushing the changes, it turned out that it no longer builds on > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231105.n.0 changes

2023-11-05 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231104.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231105.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 41 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 210.15 KiB Size of dropped packages

Heads up: Update SFML from 2.5.1 to 2.6.1 with soname bump coming to rawhide

2023-11-05 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, SFML will be build in sidetag f40-build-side-77060 . These packages will be rebuild : CSFML attract-mode dolphin-emu extremetuxracer gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars marsshooter ostrichriders visualboyadvance-m Best regards -- Sérgio M. B. __

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

2023-11-05 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 11/2/23 06:36, Christopher wrote: On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Christopher wrote: It's also not clear when this option would take effect. Would it take effect if I did `dnf install /path/to/local/file` or just when I did no,

Re: Heads up: Update SFML from 2.5.1 to 2.6.1 with soname bump coming to rawhide (finished)

2023-11-05 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > SFML will be build in sidetag f40-build-side-77060 . > > These packages will be rebuild : > CSFML > attract-mode > dolphin-emu > extremetuxracer > gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars > marsshooter > ostrichriders > visualboyadvanc

Swift on aarch64 and 39 and Rawhide...suggestions?

2023-11-05 Thread Ron Olson
Hey all- I’m still having a difficult time trying to figure out what to do about this issue I’m having. Swift 5.9 was released awhile ago and I’ve been able to build it for x864_64 on all versions of Fedora (Rawhide, 39, 38, 37) just fine. On aarch64 (the only other architecture supported), i

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

2023-11-05 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 3:54 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 11/2/23 06:36, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > >>> It's also not clear when this option would take effect. Would it take > >>>