On 9/9/23 1:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 04:17 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 1:05 AM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
RHEL making this change does not imply or require that Fedora do the same.
I am neither suggesting Fedora should do so, or
not do so, but
Am 08.09.23 um 22:32 schrieb Michel Lind:
Try installing fedora-repos-archive -- you'll get a repo definition for
fedora-updates-archive, which has all versions of released updates
rather than just the latest.
Are you sure it's working?
[root ~]# dnf --enablerepo=updates-archive list firefox*
On 09-09-2023 05:33, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:34 PM Maxwell G wrote:
2023-09-09T01:05:39Z Brendan Conoboy :
All new issues found or desired in RHEL (Or CentOS Stream) need to be
filed on issues.redhat.com[http://issues.redhat.com].
Hi Brendan,
Thanks for the update.
Il 09/09/23 02:09, Valter Sage ha scritto:
> Does anyone know how to contact Karsten Hopp (karsten)? This email is
> part of the non-responsive maintainer process
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237962).
>
> The activity report at https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/karsten/
> sho
On 9/9/23 01:05, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Am 08.09.23 um 22:32 schrieb Michel Lind:
Try installing fedora-repos-archive -- you'll get a repo definition for
fedora-updates-archive, which has all versions of released updates
rather than just the latest.
Are you sure it's working?
[root ~]# dnf --
Dne 08. 09. 23 v 22:42 Sandro napsal(a):
I believe, and Miroslav will correct me if I'm wrong, the script looks at the changelog and searches for SPDX. As long
as there's a changelog entry, the package is considered migrated.
However, if the License: tag value changes, it is recommended to re
Dne 08. 09. 23 v 21:58 Kai A. Hiller napsal(a):
I’m trying to recreate – on the level of RPMs – a Fedora system as resolved by DNF at an earlier moment in time (think
lockfile). Collecting a list of the installed RPMs and their versions for a given system is easily done via `dnf list
installed`;
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230908.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Branched 20230909.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-39-20230908.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
> Am 08.09.23 um 22:32 schrieb Michel Lind:
>
> Are you sure it's working?
>
> [root ~]# dnf --enablerepo=updates-archive list firefox*
> Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 0:04:10 am Sa 09 Sep 2023
> 09:39:57 CEST.
> Installierte Pakete
> firefox.x86_64 117.0-1.fc37
Am Sa., 9. Sept. 2023 um 03:05 Uhr schrieb Brendan Conoboy :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> In March of this year, Josh Boyer sent out a message to Fedora's devel list
> letting everybody know RHEL was going to move from bugzilla.redhat.com to
> issues.redhat.com (Jira) in the future [1]. The work on this ac
On 08. 09. 23 21:58, Kai A. Hiller wrote:
Is there a Fedora-canonical way of finding and attaining these superseded RPMs?
Hello, you can obtain any package ever shipped in Fedora from Koji.
First, you need to find out a source package:
$ rpm -qi python3-pip
...
Source RPM : python-pip-22.2.2
Sorry my mistake for not using full path, should be fixed now
Jun Aruga (he / him) 于 2023年9月8日周五 下午4:53写道：
> Hi,
> I am running the scratch build for rpms/ruby [1] rawhide branch right
> now, and I see the following error in the root.log on only s390x CPU
> architecture. Do you know what's wrong
In one week, 2023-09-16, I plan to update the python-ezdxf package in
Rawhide/F40 from 1.0.3 to 1.1.0[1]. Upstream warns[2]:
- WARNING: The font support changed drastically in this version, if
you use the
`ezdxf.tools.fonts` module your code will break, sorry! Pin the
`ezdxf` version
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 1:17 AM Sandro wrote:
[snip]
> Since there are now two issue trackers on the redhat.com domain
> (bugzilla.rh.c and issues.rh.c), would it be an idea to migrate
> bugzilla.rh.c to bugzilla.fp.o (or better bugs.fp.o)?
>
There's something like 150 different product queues on
On 09 Sep 2023 01:14, Joe Doss wrote:
> On 9/9/23 1:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 04:17 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 1:05 AM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>>
RHEL making this change does not imply or require that Fedora do the
same.
>>>
>>
17 matches
Mail list logo
