AVX extensions not detected properly on a Zen 2 CPU?

Hello, I have noticed the following message in my kernel log today after I attempted to decrypt my veracrypt external hard drive: [20542.328594] AVX2 instructions are not detected. [20542.382731] AVX or AES-NI instructions are not detected. [20542.404097] AVX or AES-NI instructions are not det

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

V Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:34:35PM +0100, Richard Hughes napsal(a): > you need to reboot into the new firmware before the published firmware gets > shared; Won't this suppress an effeciency of the local sharing? If a typical period between a download and the reboot is significantly longer than a pe

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230828.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230827.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230828.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 69 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 257.46 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Add a push update mechanism for https://release-monitoring.org/

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 5:29 AM Ryan Bach via devel wrote: > > Faster updates are always as plus. There's a problem with an approach like this: You need to check *manually* that the new version builds and doesn't violate any of our policies, for example, that it doesn't contain any prohibited ite

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 4:39 AM Jilayne Lovejoy wrote: > > Top-posting a few comments related to this thread in total (instead of > multiple responses to separate posts) and in hopes that people will be more > likely to see/read :) > > As to Rust saying MPL-2.0+ is invalid - this is likely becau

Re: AVX extensions not detected properly on a Zen 2 CPU?

* Julian Sikorski: > I have noticed the following message in my kernel log today after I > attempted to decrypt my veracrypt external hard drive: > > [20542.328594] AVX2 instructions are not detected. > [20542.382731] AVX or AES-NI instructions are not detected. > [20542.404097] AVX or AES-NI inst

Re: AVX extensions not detected properly on a Zen 2 CPU?

Am 28.08.23 um 14:39 schrieb Florian Weimer: * Julian Sikorski: I have noticed the following message in my kernel log today after I attempted to decrypt my veracrypt external hard drive: [20542.328594] AVX2 instructions are not detected. [20542.382731] AVX or AES-NI instructions are not dete

Re: Add a push update mechanism for https://release-monitoring.org/

On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 03:28 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote: > Faster updates are always as plus. > > Should this be under infrastructure list? > > Thoughts? > if you got a scratch build completed in a bugzilla for example : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231971 you may use m

Re: Add a push update mechanism for https://release-monitoring.org/

On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 13:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 03:28 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote: > > Faster updates are always as plus. > > > > Should this be under infrastructure list? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > if you got a scratch build completed in a bugzilla for exampl

Re: AVX extensions not detected properly on a Zen 2 CPU?

* Julian Sikorski: > Am 28.08.23 um 14:39 schrieb Florian Weimer: >> * Julian Sikorski: >> >>> I have noticed the following message in my kernel log today after I >>> attempted to decrypt my veracrypt external hard drive: >>> >>> [20542.328594] AVX2 instructions are not detected. >>> [20542.38273

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

Le samedi 26 août 2023 à 15:14 +0100, Peter Robinson a écrit : > > In a lot of corporate datacentre networks the "users" on the network > would know what the network is comprised of, and often on these > networks they will have 10s, 100s of even 1000s of identical devices > where being able to do

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230828.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20230827.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230828.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:30 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > What's the commended approach for packages that use deprecated > identifiers then? I would rather not just convert "GPL-2.0" to > "GPL-2.0-or-later" or "GPL-2.0-only", since it's almost always not > obvious which one was originally intended

RFC: Pull request for zlib-ng compat Was: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

I went ahead and started to modify Jacek's initial proposal [1] in order to integrate the feedback from this thread as well as some changes I had in mind. I have created a RFC pull request [2]. Hopefully this will help answer some of the questions we've seen here. Feedback is appreciated. I have

Announcing qatlib soversion bump in next release

Hi All, QATlib 23.08 (https://github.com/intel/qatlib) is going to be released in about 2 weeks. This will include a soversion bump (from 3 to 4) due to an ABI breakage. The API between this and the previous version is the same, however, the ABI changed due to a change in register allocation in fe

teckit license corrected

After clarifying an MPL version with an upstream, I corrected a license tag from: (LGPL-2.1-or-later OR CPL-1.0) AND (LGPL-2.1-or-later OR GPL-2.0-or-later OR MPL-2.0 OR MPL-1.1) to: (LGPL-2.1-or-later OR CPL-1.0) AND (LGPL-2.1-or-later OR GPL-2.0-or-later OR MPL-2.0) -- Petr signature.asc

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

Sorry, I am probably missing something, but how this would help my computer (or three I have at home)? Why should I have anything like this installed on my computer(s)? Why they should talk "secretly" to each other? And why there is need to download ~2 MB of data every day? My laptop has just

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

Hi Richard, Am 25.08.23 um 13:42 schrieb Richard Hughes: Hi all, I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's described in https://github.com/hug

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

Dne 28. 08. 23 v 15:36 Richard Fontana napsal(a): As for + being valid SPDX syntax, can that be supported by fedora-license-validate or whatever the tool is called today? That's probably a good idea, though it would seem to be predicated on us documenting that any "allowed" license identifier is

Re: Add a push update mechanism for https://release-monitoring.org/

Hello, as Fabio has pointed out, you can use Packit to get your releases to Fedora via pull-requests. Packit supports both push and newly also pull workflow. (So you don't need to have access to the upstream repository because it gets the info about the new version from Release Monitoring.) Thank

Re: F40 Change Proposal: SQLAlchemy 2

Thank you for sharing this. However, I wonder why is just the summary shared? Vít Dne 24. 08. 23 v 11:46 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): == Summary == The python-sqlalchemy package is upgraded to major version 2. A compatibility package python-sqlalchemy1.4 is added to the distributio

Re: F40 Change Proposal: SQLAlchemy 2

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 06:51:52PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 24. 08. 23 v 11:46 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > == Summary == > > The python-sqlalchemy package is upgraded to major version 2. A > > compatibility package python-sqlalchemy1.4 is added to the > > distribution to

Re: F40 Change Proposal: SQLAlchemy 2

I had the same question. Then I noticed this pinned post in Fedora Discussions: "We are experimenting 2 with using Fedora Discussion as part of the Changes process. Change announcements (like the one you are reading right now) will still be sent to the devel-announce mailing list, but the conversa

process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

Hi all, I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a re-review. However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and getting control of the package repo is unclear. Can anyone advise? Thanks, fu

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a re-review. However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and getting control of the package rep

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

28.08.2023, 18:34, "Scott Talbert" :On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote:  Hi all, I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a re-review. However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and gett

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 20:28 +0300, Mark E. Fuller wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have > completed a re-review. package golang-github-google-renameio-2 is in the list of Retired for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Retire_Golang_Leaves

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

On 8/26/23 00:51, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: I have twenty-year-old perl scripts that still work just fine, but in my experience, even couple-years-old python code most likely won't. I love both perl and python, but have to say that perl stability is partly due to the fact that its devel

Re: Add a push update mechanism for https://release-monitoring.org/

> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 5:29 AM Ryan Bach via devel > > There's a problem with an approach like this: You need to check > *manually* that the new version builds and doesn't violate any of our > policies, for example, that it doesn't contain any prohibited items > (like new code or content that'

Re: AVX extensions not detected properly on a Zen 2 CPU?

On 8/28/23 09:15, Florian Weimer wrote: * Julian Sikorski: I have noticed the following message in my kernel log today after I attempted to decrypt my veracrypt external hard drive: [20542.328594] AVX2 instructions are not detected. [20542.382731] AVX or AES-NI instructions are not detected. ..

Re: AVX extensions not detected properly on a Zen 2 CPU?

Nevermind, my mistake---I have dl_hwcap2=0x0 On 8/28/23 14:27, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: On 8/28/23 09:15, Florian Weimer wrote: * Julian Sikorski: I have noticed the following message in my kernel log today after I attempted to decrypt my veracrypt external hard drive: [20542.328594

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:53 PM Pete Walter wrote: > > 28.08.2023, 18:34, "Scott Talbert" : > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a > re-review. > However, since the package still exists in F37

Re: AVX extensions not detected properly on a Zen 2 CPU?

* Przemek Klosowski via devel: > Nevermind, my mistake---I have > dl_hwcap2=0x0 I think you mean dl_hwcaps_subdirs_active=0x4. That's actually the relevant line. The dl_hwcap2 difference is about FSGSBASE support, which requires kernel enablement, but doesn't have an XCR0 bit, so support inform

Current rawhide iso stops at grub and don't fully work

Is this a know issue, if so where could I find the link to the bug/issue? Anyone know? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedor

Re: Current rawhide iso stops at grub and don't fully work

https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=Rawhide&build=Fedora-Rawhide-20230828.n.0&groupid=1 -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___

Re: Current rawhide iso stops at grub and don't fully work

> On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 19:19 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote: > > Which one? There are 36 ISOs in the current Rawhide compose. > > None of the ones tested in openQA testing behaved like this: > https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version... https://dl.fedoraproject.org

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

28.08.2023, 20:08, "Fabio Valentini" :On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:53 PM Pete Walter wrote: 28.08.2023, 18:34, "Scott Talbert" : On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote:  Hi all,  I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a  r

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 15:53, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Sorry, I am probably missing something, but how this would help my > computer (or three I have at home)? One computer downloads the 2MB from the CDN and the other two download it from the first computer. This saves you 4MB in bandwidth, and saves

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Leon Fauster via devel wrote: > whats the benefit of this "self-signed TLS certificate" (as it does > not provide any "security")? Is this stub for something later ... ? It's a good question. It provides encryption (so client A can provide the file to client B withou

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 11:05, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:34:35PM +0100, Richard Hughes napsal(a): > > you need to reboot into the new firmware before the published firmware gets > > shared; > Won't this suppress an effeciency of the local sharing? Yes -- but it's a compromise b

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 12:42, Richard Hughes wrote: > I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and > default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create > lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's > described in https://github.com/hughsie/pas

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

Once upon a time, Richard Hughes said: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Leon Fauster via devel > wrote: > > whats the benefit of this "self-signed TLS certificate" (as it does > > not provide any "security")? Is this stub for something later ... ? > > It's a good question. It provides encryption

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 15:14 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Richard Hughes said: > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Leon Fauster via devel > > wrote: > > > whats the benefit of this "self-signed TLS certificate" (as it does > > > not provide any "security")? Is this stub for somethin

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 21:14, Chris Adams wrote: > Without identification though, it doesn't do that, because there's no > way for client B to know it is really talking to client A - it could be > talking to client C with a man-in-the-middle attack and a different > self-signed cert pretending to

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 21:50, Simo Sorce wrote: > It could be improved by using TOFU, so that the window of impersonation > is small, but requires clients to cache an association and then has > weird failure modes to be dealt with if one of the actors get re-imaged > or changes the cert for any re

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

Did this on my Thinkpad Edge a couple of days ago, and it went fine :) Den ons 23 aug. 2023 kl 20:23 skrev Miroslav Suchý : > > Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run an

[Test-Announce] [Test Week] F39 Anaconda WebUI Installer for Workstation is underway!

Hey folks, This week we will be testing the new Anaconda WebUI installer written with React and Cockpit. This installer will be default for Workstation for now and we would like to run through as many tests as possible from [0]. Note from developers/other likely scenarios are a) Test the new mount