On 6/22/23 06:21, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 2023-06-21 13:06, Philip Wyett wrote:
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
...
I see an impasse here. Why contribute to fedora when Red Hat will lock it down
in other products?
I don't think this is a major change from t
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
I don't see what the error is ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machine
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 04:26:35PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Obviously many will have seen:
> >
> >https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
> >
> >and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/E
Dne 22. 06. 23 v 0:11 Philip Wyett napsal(a):
One mage saying Download/Signup
One image when you click on download at no cost and you need to login or create
an account.
Beauty of using clean VM's
https://pasteboard.co/eCfDDb13IIOL.png
https://pasteboard.co/AXwSb6XWmeTN.png
So you create a
On 22/06/2023 10:11, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Nothing described in that blog post above changes this process, so
what's written there doesn't have any direct impact on Fedora.
Yet.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mai
On 6/22/23 11:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
I don't see what the error is ...
Rich.
Towards the end:
DEBUG util.py:539: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q',
'-M', '03701d048e03484c80696e05b2d9f2fe', '-D',
'/va
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I don't think there's a formal change filed yet.
>
> Matthew: Did you want to do that? Or would you like me or someone else
> to do so?
I would love someone else to do so, but if no one else wants to, I can. :)
--
Matthew Miller
F
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
>
> I don't see what the error is ...
Mock appears to have failed to install the builddeps, for unknown
reasons. I would just re-try the build in hope that it is
> On 6/22/23 06:21, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> That's how I understand it well and I'm a bit confused what's the
> "fuss" about. The git.centos.org mirrored sources that were used to build
> CentOS. Since CentOS is no longer supported, and we have the CentOS Stream,
> the same is
> true - the sour
Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
I don't see what the error is ...
Mock appears to have failed to install the builddeps, for unknown
reasons. I
>> ELN is a build of (some) Fedora packages with EL-specific options, so
>> it requires Fedora.
> ELN can exist off an internal non fedora tree. Just depends who is
> updating the tree.
Sure, but... that's the _opposite_ of the direction things are going.
Previously, what happened to make a major
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 10:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
> > >
> > > I don't see what the error is ...
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 11:02 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 10:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 08:44:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> In the specific case of RHEL srpms, it makes life harder for EPEL
> packagers because you can't look at the source easily when they are
> problems between RHEL and EPEL packages. It matches well with RH's
> standard of shipping lib
Hi,
a few more issues appeared:
1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549
No ETA for fixing this one
2. Packit's sanity copr installation test fails due to to dnf5-plugins
needed for copr plugin.
ETA
Hi all,
This mail is just a heads up on go-sig delicate current status.
After a "non-responsive" process for one of the go-sig members[1], a
lot of go-sig packages become orphans. This maintainer has been
working for years creating hundreds of packages and updating them.
The orphaning process ca
Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:44 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
In each case, the way it was done and communicated was literally begging for
bad press.
...
So, the signal is either "we don't care about our upstream" or "we do not understand
upstream's importance and concerns".
None of the last two. It is
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:02:13AM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 10:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
Hey all,
Now that the initial hurdle of getting rpm 4.19 into rawhide is over,
it's time to start looking towards enabling the sysusers integration:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/users_and_groups.html
We (as in rpm-team) are not pushing for doing all this in Fedora 39,
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 18:28 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! So, as per https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3011 , we plan to
> enable gating of Rawhide updates on openQA test results on Wednesday.
This is now enabled! Please let me and/or releng know if it causes any
terrible consequences, an
I'm a Red Hat employed engineer, working on all Fedora, CentOS Stream and RHEL.
This is what each means for me in particular (but should also be
applicable in general) in practice:
* RHEL - only when I'm bound by some legal requirement (embargo, etc.)
I do work 'RHEL only' (not visible in CentOS s
On 6/21/23 22:26, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
Obviously many will have seen:
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/EPEL) have been knocked down:
https://bugzilla
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2023-06-23 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
* x86_64-v3 baseline and dropping i686 multilib
* Plans for the next 3-6 months
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.o
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:26 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Obviously many will have seen:
> >
> >https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
> >
> >and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/EPEL) hav
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:46 PM Philip Wyett wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:39 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:09 PM Philip Wyett
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It has much to do. Fedora is a community apparently Red Hat no longer
> > > needs. The now ELN
> > > backend
> > > c
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:18:27PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Now that the initial hurdle of getting rpm 4.19 into rawhide is over, it's
> time to start looking towards enabling the sysusers integration:
> https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/users_and_groups.html
Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said:
> I was hoping we would be make the dependency on setup optional.
> It is a fairly heavyweight package (700+ kb) and with lots of
> not-that-useful-on-a-typical-modern-installation stuff (mail alias support,
> csh profile, /etc/hosts, nfs exports
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.21
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
=
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_1.5.15
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Commit
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Comm
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoCustomQtThemingForWorkstation
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implem
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_Extension_Flags_Reduction
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
I've heard a couple of folks report that they tried updating a Rawhide
system or container and it failed with:
Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
packages: dnf
The problem seems to be caused by doing the upgrade with an older dnf
installed. dnf-4.15.1-1.fc39
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireModularity
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committ
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> == Open Questions ==
> 1) For the "canary" Fedora ELN rebuild, we have two choices on how to
> select the git hash to be built for each package in the ELN list:
>
> Approach 1 (Rawhide-style):
> 1. Clone each package
> 2. Check for the ex
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/sericea-xorgless
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committ
Am 22.06.23 um 16:08 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:26 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
Obviously many will have seen:
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
and see, where EL (contributors
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_1.5.15
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Commit
Hello,
Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
Best regards
-Othman
rpms/aria2
rpms/hydra
rpms/libmodsecurity
rpms/lynis
rpms/mod_limitipconn
rpms/mod_qos
rpms/mod_ruid2
rpms/mod_security3
rpms/mod_security_crs
rpms/python-paramiko
rpms/thc-ipv6
r
Hello,
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 11:01:28 AM EDT Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > 2. systemd provides users and groups that are actually owned by the setup
> > package. As rpm is now turning non-root file ownership into dependencies,
> > systemd could end up pulled in where setup is needed
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023, at 6:32 PM, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> But is Red Hat still commited to open source and to the freedom of software?
>
> I feel no and feel cheated and betrayed.
Hey Ralf,
why do you feel that way? The sources are still available both upstream
(CentOS) and downstream (albeit b
Hi,
On 6/22/23 11:21, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
> == Detailed Description ==
> As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
> work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
> loader, and moves the kernel + initrd to the EFI system partiti
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 12:14:28 PM EDT Aoife Moloney wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
>
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > It doesn't attempt to create unified kernel images, so the
> > existing `dnf update`, `kdumpctl`, and `make install` in a kernel
> > source directory should all work.
>
> Nitpick: 'make install' invokes /usr/bin/insta
Hello,
I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a workflow that
checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into an rpm, builds it,
and runs the results through annocheck.
If there is a warning I'd like to investigate, I cd into the build directory.
But oops, now
I've taken lynis and python-paramiko.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, June 22nd, 2023 at 11:48 A
Dear Steve,
I usually use smth like
RPM_ARCH=1 RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE=2 RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION=3 RPM_PACKAGE_NAME=4 make
in this situation and have never got any problem yet.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:58 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I ha
On 21/06/2023 19:33, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
If you'll add me as admin/owner on the packages I'll continue to
maintain them. FAS jonathanspw
Especially interested in remmina since I use it nearly every day.
Hi Jonathan,
If you want help with remmina, you can add me as a co-maintain
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:57 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a workflow
> that
> checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into an rpm, builds it,
> and runs the results through annocheck.
>
> If there is a warning I'd
Hi,
On 6/22/23 12:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
== Detailed Description ==
As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
loader, and
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:02 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> >> ELN is a build of (some) Fedora packages with EL-specific options, so
> >> it requires Fedora.
> > ELN can exist off an internal non fedora tree. Just depends who is
> > updating the tree.
>
> Sure, but... that's the _opposite_ of the di
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 11:48:18 AM CDT Othman Madjoudj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
>
> Best regards
> -Othman
>
>
> rpms/aria2
> rpms/hydra
> rpms/libmodsecurity
> rpms/lynis
> rpms/mod_limitipconn
> rpms/mod_qos
> r
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:56 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a
> workflow that
> checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into an rpm,
> builds it,
> and runs the results through annocheck.
>
> If there is a warning
Hi,
A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use the results
`Fedora CI - dist-git test` in the PR testing.
The upstream bug that will need to be fixed to unblock Zuul testing:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549
Other problems are hopefully resolved.
Best r
To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disable Rawhide testing via Zull in
dist-git PRs:
https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/180
/M
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:19 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use the results
> `Fed
22/06/23 11:06, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 08:44:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
In the specific case of RHEL srpms, it makes life harder for EPEL
packagers because you can't look at the source easily when they are
problems between RHEL and EPEL packages. It matches well w
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 2:14:22 PM EDT Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:57 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a
> > workflow that checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into
> > an rpm, builds it, and runs the
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 2:11:45 PM EDT Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> I usually use smth like
> RPM_ARCH=1 RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE=2 RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION=3 RPM_PACKAGE_NAME=4
> make in this situation and have never got any problem yet.
Dmitry, you are a saint. :-) I cannot accept this as the new normal
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230621.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230622.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:13
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 82
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 14.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
I've taken aria2 and thc-ipv6.
Thank you for your contributions, Othman!
--Neil
On 22.06.2023 18:48, Othman Madjoudj wrote:
Hello,
Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
Best regards
-Othman
rpms/aria2
rpms/hydra
rpms/libmodsecurity
rpms/lynis
rpms/mod_
On 6/22/23 19:01, Matthew Miller wrote:
Sure, but... that's the _opposite_ of the direction things are going.
Awesome post.
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23004 spec files in Fedora
* 29461license tags in all spec files
* 17975 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 6743tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
* Progress: 38.99% ░░░███ 100%
Today we have:
* 23055 spec files in Fedora
* 295
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023, at 11:01 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 1. Fedora Rawhide continually updated
> 2. ELN maintained in parallel, as part of Fedora
> 3. At some point, ELN branched to new CentOS Stream
> 4. ... a year or so of CentOS Stream development in public ...
> 5. RHEL Beta forked from that
Hello.
I orphaned the following packages:
rpms/axc
rpms/git-subrepo
rpms/jdns
rpms/maddy
rpms/mdns
rpms/pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications
rpms/pidgin-privacy-please
rpms/pidgin-toobars
rpms/psi
rpms/psi-plus
rpms/purple-discord
rpms/purple-googlechat
rpms/purple-libsteam
rpms/purple-lurch
rp
67 matches
Mail list logo
