Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Hello, I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May.  The change was already announced in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5

Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Hello, I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May.  The change was already announced in https://fedoraprojec

Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

On 26. 05. 23 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Hello, I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May.  The change was

Re: more distinct default bash prompt?

AFAIK Gnome Terminal is the only terminal that uses white background by default. To my knowledge, all the other terminals use black background. On 26. 5. 2023 8:50, Barry wrote: On 25 May 2023, at 16:58, stan via devel wrote: I find the green too bright, I would prefer it with a little mo

HEADS UP: ceph-18 (reef) coming to rawhide soon

Hi, ceph-18 RC will likely be tagged in the next week or two, according to my sources. (Note: wrt rhbz#2193399, the submoduled/bundled boost that's currently in ceph-18 is newer than the version in ceph-17 (quincy) and does support kXXH3 cksum. Ceph, even ceph-18, hasn't caught up to boost-1.81,

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230526.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230526.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

OpenColorIO builds failing due to doxygen patch level update?

On a side note I love the packager dashboard! I noticed that OpenColorIO builds in rawhide were failing[1] and took a look at the logs and the errors seem to be around doxygen: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenColorIO-2.2.1/src/bindings/python/PyOpenColorIO.h:18, f

Deprecation of the aspell package

Hi, I would like to announce the Fedora change for the deprecation of the aspell package [1]. This package has a dead upstream and has been obsoleted (in most occurrences) by the hunspell package [2]. The Fedora Change [3] is describing this in more detail, feel free to view and read it. [1] ht

Re: Deprecation of the aspell package

Sorry for the wrong URL of the change. This is the right one [1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AspellDeprecation On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:30 PM Lukas Javorsky wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to announce the Fedora change for the deprecation of the > aspell package [1]. > > This pac

Re: Deprecation of the aspell package

On 26. 05. 23 14:40, Lukas Javorsky wrote: Sorry for the wrong URL of the change. This is the right one [1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AspellDeprecation On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:30 PM Lukas Javorsky

Re: looking for new maintainers of the emacs package

Hi Daiki, I'm interested in maintaining emacs. I'm already maintaining it on RHEL. -- Jacek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://doc

Re: Deprecation of the aspell package

Thanks, Miro for the correction. I totally forgot the BuildRequires, I've already updated the list. On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:45 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 05. 23 14:40, Lukas Javorsky wrote: > > Sorry for the wrong URL of the change. This is the right one [1]. > > > > [1] https://fedorapr

Re: Intel Microcodes ?

> is someone active mainting this package ? > > AFAIK, my RKL-S (Intel Core i5-11400) should be on 58 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2054688 > https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/relea... ping Eugene Syromiatnikov I see the package is m

Re: OpenColorIO builds failing due to doxygen patch level update?

On Fri, 26 May 2023, Richard Shaw wrote: On a side note I love the packager dashboard! I noticed that OpenColorIO builds in rawhide were failing[1] and took a look at the logs and the errors seem to be around doxygen: In file included from/builddir/build/BUILD/OpenColorIO-2.2.1/src/bindings/py

SecureBoot certificates

Hello, I was poking around a F38 system to look over the Secure Boot certificates and found something that may warrant attention. sbattach --detach signature /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/fbx64.efi openssl pkcs7 -inform DER -in signature -text -print_certs > grub-certs.txt Issuer: CN=Fedora Secu

CVE: Python-twisted a.o. needs update for F37 due to matrix-synapse security issue

Hi, due to an outdated(afaik) python-twisted version, it's not possible to build matrix-synapse in version 1.8x . Unlucky for all F37 users, matrix-synpase has 3 embargoed CVEs coming, which need fixing asap. As "releng" has shipped the last twisted update, I have no clue who could help here

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230526.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230525.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230526.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 178 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 106.37 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: F39 proposal: BiggerESP (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hello! There are two things to consider, both mean that I can't really ever say "yes we will do it" for a request like that. - None of the anaconda devs are qualified enough to decide if we could accept such a change. It's a bootloader thing. What we would do is delegate to somebody working with b

Planned Outage of s390x affecting all koji 2023-06-01

Planned Outage - koji/s390x - 2023-06-01 05:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2023-06-01 05:00 UTC, which will last approximately 24 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2023-06-01 05:00UTC' Reas

Re: SecureBoot certificates

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:20 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello, > > I was poking around a F38 system to look over the Secure Boot certificates and > found something that may warrant attention. > I *suspect* this is all wrapped into the issue that shims must now have/use NX support to be signed, and

Re: SecureBoot certificates

On Friday, May 26, 2023 11:18:32 AM EDT Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:20 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > > I was poking around a F38 system to look over the Secure Boot > > certificates and found something that may warrant attention. > > I *suspect* this is all wrapped into the issu

Updating fast_float from 4.0.0 to 5.0.0 in Rawhide, with a license change

This is a “heads-up” email about a (non-breaking) major version update with a (non-disruptive) license change in the fast_float package in Rawhide. Once I have a successful scratch build in the PR[1], I plan to update fast_float from 4.0.0 to 5.0.0. ABI changes are impossible because this is

Re: more distinct default bash prompt?

Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > In Fedora the bash prompt is not colored or highlighted by default. > > I personally find this a usability issue: it makes it hard to find previous > commands between long outputs when scrolling back in a terminal. I find myself pressing Enter several times before run

Re: more distinct default bash prompt?

Chris Adams wrote: > My personal (bike-shedding) preference is to not run external commands > on every prompt though; when a system is slow or having problems, those > can kill any chance at recovery or even troubleshooting. I agree. Please keep the number of things that can make the shell unusabl

Re: more distinct default bash prompt?

Marián Konček wrote: > AFAIK Gnome Terminal is the only terminal that uses white background by > default. To my knowledge, all the other terminals use black background. If you can get *all* the terminal emulators amended so that users can configure the prompt color in the same dialog box where th

employment related packager groups

Greetings everyone. Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the like. FESCo has been asked about creating company related gro

Re: disabling Haskell i686 packages

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:12:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I think this will make quite a few packages FTBFS on i686 because they > require pandoc at build time. It's not that many—I count ~75 that Is there any reason to build docs for i686 packages? (With or without some cleverness that a

Re: Deprecation of the aspell package

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 02:30:09PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote: > This package has a dead upstream and has been obsoleted (in most > occurrences) by the hunspell package [2]. Oh no! I will have to update my joerc! And remember how to update my joerc! Thanks for the notice! -- Matthew Miller F

Re: looking for new maintainers of the emacs package

Hello, I would like to help as well. Though I'm not part of the packagers group, I have contributed to Emacs package in past for new releases. And I also maintain the emacs-pretest Copr whose changes are then sent as PR to the emacs package when a pretest version becomes a stable release. - h

Re: Deprecation of the aspell package

What are Finnish users supposed to do once aspell-fi retires? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project

Re: employment related packager groups

On 5/26/23 20:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a > group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for > SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the > like. > Thank

Re: employment related packager groups

> Am 27.05.2023 um 07:41 schrieb Benson Muite : > > On 5/26/23 20:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Greetings everyone. >> …. >> Should we require some documentation? ie, should the group have to make >> a doc/wiki page explaining what it's for and how to reach group owners >> in case of problems? >>