Is there a chance to have Octave 8.1 at F38?
вс, 9 апр. 2023 г. в 18:49, Orion Poplawski :
>
> On 4/8/23 17:27, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 4/5/23 20:22, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >> I will be updating octave to 8.1 this weekend. This involves a soname
> >> bump and I will be rebuilding all deps
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230415.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 150
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Once upon a time, David Abdurachmanov said:
> I would love to avoid supporting SBCs, especially as some of them are
> really not suitable for feature rich Linux distributions.
For me, my only interest in the foreseeable future for RISC-V would be
SBCs, as an alternative to ARM (e.g. Raspberry Pi)
On 4/15/23 00:10, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
We have to support SCBs as-is. We even have 64-core OoO (and even
dual-socket 128-core) systems coming that are still RVA20 (what I call
"a large scale SBC trying to be a server").
I think elsewhere you suggested treating the profile as the subarc
On 4/15/23 00:25, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 7:08 AM Jeff Law wrote:
On 4/14/23 20:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
We should not screw up with RISC-V in Fedora like RHEL did with ARM.
Yes, I'm saying RHEL's ARM strategy was a mistake, and still is, to
some degree. We see
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 08:38:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 4/15/23 00:10, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
>
>
> >
> > We have to support SCBs as-is. We even have 64-core OoO (and even
> > dual-socket 128-core) systems coming that are still RVA20 (what I call
> > "a large scale SBC trying to
Hi Zbyszek,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:34:14AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f3
