Dear all,
yesterday I created my first package repository:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
fedpkg request-repo Atomes 2130607
After a first try using "atomes" that did not work, indeed fedpkg requested
the keyword to be "Atomes
On 4/13/23 11:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> Dear all,
> yesterday I created my first package repository:
>
Congratulations!
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
>
> I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
>
> fedpkg request-repo Atomes 2130607
>
> After a first try usin
On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
Dear all,
yesterday I created my first package repository:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
fedpkg request-repo Atomes 2130607
After a first try using "atomes" that did not work, in
On 4/13/23 11:29, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>
> Le 13/04/2023 à 10:26, Benson Muite a écrit :
>> On 4/13/23 11:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> yesterday I created my first package repository:
>>>
>> Congratulations!
> Thank you so much, this is kind of exciting !
>> i) retire the pac
Il 13/04/23 10:27, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
>
> In http://bugzilla.redhat.com/2130607 the reviewer should have noted this and
> not approve the package.
>
Why? The "full lowercase naming" is no more a MUST:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_general_naming
Mattia
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:35:31PM -0400, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:05 PM Colin Walters wrote:
> > Looks like this broke our mounting of zram:
> >
> > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1462
I don't think it's related to the new API. libblkid is not abl
On 13. 04. 23 10:49, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 13/04/23 10:27, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
In http://bugzilla.redhat.com/2130607 the reviewer should have noted this and
not approve the package.
Why? The "full lowercase naming" is no more a MUST:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packa
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > yesterday I created my first package repository:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
> >
> > I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
> >
> > fedpkg requ
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:21 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> > yesterday I created my first package repository:
>> >
>> > https://src.fedoraproje
Dne 12. 04. 23 v 17:40 stan via devel napsal(a):
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 11. 04. 23 v 18:02 stan via devel napsal(a):
I have the following defined in .bashrc:
# this logs the history explicitly before exiting a shell
hx ()
{
history -a;
exit;
}
It
OLD: Fedora-38-20230412.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230413.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
> On 12 Apr 2023, at 16:40, stan via devel
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Dne 11. 04. 23 v 18:02 stan via devel napsal(a):
>>>
>>> I have the following defined in .bashrc:
>>>
>>> # this logs the history explicitly before exiting a shell
>>> hx (
> On 13 Apr 2023, at 16:13, Barry wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On 12 Apr 2023, at 16:40, stan via devel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>
>>> Dne 11. 04. 23 v 18:02 stan via devel napsal(a):
I have the following defined in .bashrc:
>>
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:48:01 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 12. 04. 23 v 17:40 stan via devel napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
> > Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >> What about using `~/.bash_logout` to avoid the need of `hx`?
> > I had to do some research to even understand what y
Hello!
The latest babl-0.1.102 update in rawhide [1] introduces an unannounced
API break. It no longer ships babl.pc and included babl-0.1.pc instead,
which means any application trying to detect it using pkg-config will
fail. This causes, for example, gimp to FTBFS:
...
configure:24501: checking
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.6 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
The Fedora Linux 38 Final RC 1.6 compose is GO and will be shipped on
Tuesday, 18 April. For more information please check the
Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1][2] or log[3][4].
[1]
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-04-13/f38_final_gono-go_meeting.2023-04-13-17.05.html
[2]
https://me
I didn't mention this in time to even discuss whether it'd make a good
addition to the release notes, but I think users will be happy to see
that Fedora 38 Workstation boots faster and uses less baseline memory
(measured from a session logged in to GNOME with only a terminal
application running
18 matches
Mail list logo
