OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 374.38 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 11-03-2023 14:58, Petr Menšík wrote:
Is it enough if I orphan that package? Is there any guidance where
existing package is found to have licensing problem, how should it be
solved? Should something be done to the stable branches also? Should it
be retired from all stable branches as well? How
OLD: Fedora-38-20230311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 7.84 MiB
Size of dropped packages:3.93 MiB
Size
Il 11/03/23 14:58, Petr Menšík ha scritto:
> Hi!
>
> I own htdig package, which got recently discovered license issue with
> bundled libdb version ~3.x [1]. I think the only reason it is still in
> Fedora is that just compiled for years back. I doubt anyone is using it
> at the moment and I have ne
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 8:58 AM Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I own htdig package, which got recently discovered license issue with
> bundled libdb version ~3.x [1]. I think the only reason it is still in
> Fedora is that just compiled for years back. I doubt anyone is using it
> at the moment and
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 6:58 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10 2023 at 04:17:13 PM -0500, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > Yeah, this is a change from previous guidance. Instead of trying to
> > calculate
> > the effect, just state what's there. Even if it makes the expression
> > kind of
# F37 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2023-03-13
# Time: **16:00** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 11 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
review meeting.
Note that clocks went forward in North America this weekend, so the
meeting time in U
libmpcdec will soon get a LONG overdue update[1] from SV7 (1.2.6, .so.5) to
SV8 (1.3.0, .so.6) in f38 and rawhide. Affected Fedora packages will be
revbumped and rebuilt in a side tag:
k3b
xine-lib
xmms2
Fedora packages that will be able to (re)enable MusePack support by building
against libmpcd
On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 11:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 6:58 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 10 2023 at 04:17:13 PM -0500, Matthew Miller
> > wrote:
> > > Yeah, this is a change from previous guidance. Instead of trying to
> > > calculate
> > > the effec
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.112-18.fc39 will correct the license from
(LGPL-2.1-or-later) to
(LGPL-2.1-or-later AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl))
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125519
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 10.3.2023 klo 15.51:
Here's another "surprise for the new user" that I suggest being added.
What does the % character mean?
Sometimes it's the beginning of a section. Sometimes it's a macro.
I see now that the web page color codes the two differently,
but that's not
On Sat, 2023-03-11 at 23:04 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 6:34 PM Miroslav Suchý
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dne 01. 01. 21 v 12:58 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 5:07 AM Michael Schwendt
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 16:
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for jamatos (José Matos). Does
anyone know how to contact José?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175015
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171739
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171428
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
13 matches
Mail list logo
