The survey is now closed.
We had 67 responses and 67% of those responses are for favor to keep
gain/trouble labels. So we will keep them, it seems that majority of
community is happy with them as they are.
Thank you for the responses.
On behalf of I&R Team,
Michal
On 06. 03. 23 10:22, Micha
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230306.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230307.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 151
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1009.76 KiB
Size of dropped packages
biber-2.19 will correct a license from ((GPL+ or Artistic 2.0) and
Artistic 2.0) to (Artistic-2.0).
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
Hi, I'm a beginner at fedora packaging and following the guide in the
documentation.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the
same directory, I've made the spec file, but after I run
fedpkg --releas
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Betty Liu wrote:
Hi, I'm a beginner at fedora packaging and following the guide in the
documentation.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the
same directory, I've made the spe
V Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:19:11PM -, Betty Liu napsal(a):
> I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In
> the same directory, I've made the spec file, but after I run
> fedpkg --release f28 mockbuild
I worry that f28 is tool old and unknown to mock nowdays. T
Hello everyone,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the DNF5 test day,
which will happen in one week, on the 14th of March.
We are finalizing the test cases. All the information will be posted on
test/test-announce mailing-lists as usual. For now, head over to the
wiki[1] and save
Thank you for your quick response! I will switch to Fedora and have a try!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
Yeah thank you so much! I will switch to Fedora 37 and have a try again www
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_Beta_1.2_Summary
Workstation Pre Beta image installs and works :)
On 3/7/23, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validat
libcbor will be updated to 0.10.2 in rawhide in the
next week or so, which includes a soname bump.
The list of affected packages in rawhide are:
libfido2
fwupd
I will rebuild libfido2. For fwupd, I will need the maintainers
(CC'ed) or a proven packagers assistance.
I have used the Mass Prebuil
Hello,
Now Kernel 6.2 test day is happening:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-03-05_Kernel_6.2_Test_Week
I encourage all of you to test the new kernel release and share your
results.
Priscila.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:51 AM Nicola Sella wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to
Petr Pisar wrote:
> [...] Either turn that directory into a git repository (git
> init-db . && git add hello.spec && git commit -a) ...
Just a minor, tangential nit, `git init` is the preferred
and documented command. The `git init-db` command is an
ancient name for it. The documentation for `gi
On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 10:24 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.or
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 4:32 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:55 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> > I will rebuild libfido2. For fwupd, I will need the maintainers
> > (CC'ed) or a proven packagers assistance.
>
> No problem at all, thanks for letting me know. Do you need me to
== Meeting summary
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-07/fesco.2023-03-07-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-07/fesco.2023-03-07-17.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-07/fesco.2023-
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:04 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 4:55 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> > Let me know if you have any issues
> > with the build.
>
> All done, thanks.
Thank you. I have submitted the side-tag update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-
Petr Pisar kirjoitti 7.3.2023 klo 16.48:
V Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:19:11PM -, Betty Liu napsal(a):
I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the
same directory, I've made the spec file, but after I run
fedpkg --release f28 mockbuild
I worry that f28 is to
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tibbitts
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:51 PM
> To: Kenneth Goldman
> Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc
>
> > Kenneth Goldman writes:
>
> > but … if the tu
> -Original Message-
> From: Vít Ondruch
> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 6:58 AM
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or
> pushurl
>
> > How does it know what to build. Does it default to configure;make
> > or so
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 11:14:34PM +, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
> Let's see if I have this right ...
>
> %build
> %configure
> %make_build
>
> are not three separate steps. %build is the overall step, and the next two
> lines
> are the build steps. The blank line terminates the %build. Corre
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 12:15 AM Kenneth Goldman wrote:
>
> Where are the macros defined? I.e., %configure probably expands
> to ./configure and %make_build to make.
In addition to Chuck's reply, you can also use the --eval (or -E) flag
with rpm to see the values of variables or to what a macro a
Works for me in Virtualbox did the i18n testing with it
On 3/8/23, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testin
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, only Fedora 37 (and Rawhide) packages are present in stable
repositories.
Other supported packages are waiting in testing repositories and should be
available in stable in the ne
26 matches
Mail list logo
