Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230304.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230303.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230304.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 168 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 8.25 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:02:43PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 15:56, Ben Cotton wrote: > > 2. crypto-policies — Insecure installed RPMs (like Google Chrome) > > prevent system updates in F38, can't be removed — NEW > > ACTION: Upstream to implement MR #129 > > > > > >

Review libunicode and contour-terminal

Hi, I made the two review requests of libunicode and contour-terminal in order to add them to Fedora official repo. Does anyone can help me review the two packages? Any review swap will be fine if I can. Thanks. ref: libunicode: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174383 contour-terminal

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230304.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230303.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230304.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Packaging portmidi versions: devel conflicts OK?

Il 03/03/23 19:00, Michael J Gruber ha scritto: > SHORT VERSION > > The portmidi library in Fedora is at version 217, which is quite old. > Upstream changed to a new version scheme, currently at 2.0.4, and > dumped some subpackages. To serve the needs of different other > packages, it would be easi

Re: Packaging portmidi versions: devel conflicts OK?

> Il 03/03/23 19:00, Michael J Gruber ha scritto: > What about: > > - create a compat-portmidi0 package and move current portmidi there > (bonus: mark it as deprecated) > - change frescobaldi to require the compat package until a fix is available > - update current portmidi package to v2 That is

Heads-up: flatbuffers 23.3.3 coming to F39/Rawhide and F38/Branched

In one week (2023-03-11), or slightly later, I plan to update flatbuffers to 23.3.3 in F39/Rawhide and F38/Branched[1]. This is an incompatible update because the libraries offer no ABI stability—the .so version is bumped to 23.3.3—and because the --proto option was removed from the flatc compi

Firecracker microVM manager

Hi, Firecracker[0] is a minimal virtual machine manager (a la QEMU) written in Rust that uses KVM to start Linux VMs extremely quickly and securely. It is used by AWS Lambda and Fargate among other things to make VM startup time comparable to containers. I've built it for Fedora x86_64 and share

Re: gnutls time_t breakage on i686

Florian Weimer wrote: > And I thought Wine can run 32-bit Windows applications against 64-bit > system libraries these days? Or at least it's getting there. Then Wine > wouldn't be a reason to keep 32-bit builds around. > > | *** WoW64 > | > | - The 64-bit Windows-on-Windows (WoW64) architectur

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 12:41 PM David Michael wrote: > > Hi, > > Firecracker[0] is a minimal virtual machine manager (a la QEMU) > written in Rust that uses KVM to start Linux VMs extremely quickly and > securely. It is used by AWS Lambda and Fargate among other things to > make VM startup time c

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

David Michael wrote: > - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is > officially unsupported upstream[3]. Functionality would be harmed by > not using musl, e.g. seccomp filters are not used. Upstream's refusal to write seccomp filters that work with glibc should be a red fla

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 6:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > David Michael wrote: > > - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is > > officially unsupported upstream[3]. Functionality would be harmed by > > not using musl, e.g. seccomp filters are not used. > > Upstream's

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 5:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 12:41 PM David Michael wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Firecracker[0] is a minimal virtual machine manager (a la QEMU) > > written in Rust that uses KVM to start Linux VMs extremely quickly and > > securely. It is used by AWS Lambd

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 7:31 PM David Michael wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 5:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 12:41 PM David Michael wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Firecracker[0] is a minimal virtual machine manager (a la QEMU) > > > written in Rust that uses KVM to start Lin

Re: Packaging portmidi versions: devel conflicts OK?

On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 8:13 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Il 03/03/23 19:00, Michael J Gruber ha scritto: > > What about: > > > > - create a compat-portmidi0 package and move current portmidi there > > (bonus: mark it as deprecated) > > - change frescobaldi to require the compat package until a

libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.2-12.fc39 rawhide 4.1 M

sudo dnf up --refresh [sudo] password for you: Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 3.4 kB/s | 989 B 00:00 Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for t 58 kB/s | 21 kB 00:00 Fedora - Modular Rawhide - Developmental packag 113 kB/s | 22 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion

Re: libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.2-12.fc39 rawhide 4.1 M

On 05/03/2023 04:16, Reon Beon via devel wrote: Problem 1: package libchromaprint-1.5.1-7.fc38.x86_64 requires libavcodec.so.59()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed RPM Fusion has ffmpeg 6.x in Rawhide and Fedora is still on 5.1. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easyco