"Comment # 3 on bug 6573 from leigh scott
You will need to wait until we complete branching, the next package push on
Monday will fix the release issue."
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
> Posted the rpmfusion bug here:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6573
Try learning to wait patiently, branching isn't a simple process.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Affected Services:
>
> s390x koji builders. Jobs will queue up, but not be processed until
> the builders are back online. Maintainers are urged to just avoid
> submitting builds just before and during this outage.
Do we need to ca
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:37:08 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Affected Services:
> >
> > s390x koji builders. Jobs will queue up, but not be processed until
> > the builders are back online. Maintainers are urged to just avoi
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:13 AM John Reiser wrote:
> On 2/10/23 19:57, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > So I know the s390x builders are down but I have an active BZ for tests
> failing with s390x so I figured what the heck, maybe doing a local
> mocbuild attempt using qemu could help here like it did wi
On 1/31/23 14:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
>
> 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
> approxima
Please base the f38-background.spec on the f37-background.spec.
Especially the license tag.
According the packaging guidelines the license tag for new packages should be
in SPDX form.
|This has been already changed in f37-backgrounds for some time.|
|https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/f37-backgr
Thank you for the notice.
According to a repoquery:
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo='*source*' --dnf-cmd --
repoquery --whatrequires '*embree*'
the openpgl package should have been included in the list as well. It
looks like openpgl failed to build in the F38 mass rebuild, but
On 11. 02. 23 14:02, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
it has so far taken two weeks of waiting to get the long-awaited libQGLViewer
update in Fedora. Since this is a soname bump, per Fedora policy the update will
take another week before it can be built in rawhide; the libQGLViewer maintainer
has now ann
> After several attempts, Blender is finally available for EPEL9 as 3.3
> LTS series. Major differences compared to its Fedora counterpart is the
> minimal dependencies based on blender_lite.cmake[2] thus light version.
> As the result, functions like Cycle Rendering will be unavailable but
> Eevee
Ben Cotton wrote:
> 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image
> exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been
asking for data on the size impact and I have been completely ignored both
by the Change owners
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 06:44:03PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Fedora Linux 38 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
>> --rebase to pick up the new branch
>
> I know this has been discussed seemingly on every branching since the
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler via devel said:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image
> > exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
>
> Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been
> asking for data on the size impact an
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 06:42:51AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:13 AM John Reiser wrote:
>
> > On 2/10/23 19:57, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > So I know the s390x builders are down but I have an active BZ for tests
> > failing with s390x so I figured what the heck, maybe do
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> 'git pull --rebase' is a strange command to suggest. I does the job,
>> but almost by accident, and it's confusing things by mixing in rebasing.
>> Can we make this just say 'git fetch' or 'git fetch -v' ?
>
> The thing is, you
On 11-02-2023 18:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-37-primary
Error: GPG check FAILED
Perhaps this is a branching issue, I'm F37 now and it appears to be
working, albeit quite slow 😄
Yes, it could be... we need to get new branched/rawhide c
On 2023-02-11 07:04, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Please base the f38-background.spec on the f37-background.spec.
Especially the license tag.
According the packaging guidelines the license tag for new packages
should be in SPDX form.
|This has been already changed in f37-backgrounds for some time.|
Hello
My name is Priscila Gutierres, and I would like to introduce myself.
I'm not good at this, but as a background, I can tell you that I've been
working as package owner at Red Hat for 3 months, but I've been there
for more than two years.
I'm still learning about rpm packaging, but I would li
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 2:38 PM Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> My name is Priscila Gutierres, and I would like to introduce myself.
> I'm not good at this, but as a background, I can tell you that I've been
> working as package owner at Red Hat for 3 months, but I've been there
> for mor
Hello team,
I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
writing. Does it mean the branching is in process?
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
There are API changes in Embree 4 that are likely to require source code
changes in dependent packages.
I’ve patched USD to compile with Embree 4[2] and kicked off builds in
the side tags[3][4], which I expect to succeed. Since we’re not
currently able to easily run the tests, it’s hard to be
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
> writing. Does it mean the branching is in process?
No, branching was all completed a while back.
Can you expand on why/what happens/what
On 2023-02-11 12:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
writing. Does it mean the branching is in process?
No, branching was all completed a while back.
Can y
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-11 12:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > > Hello team,
> > >
> > > I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
> > > writing.
On 2023-02-11 12:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2023-02-11 12:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this tim
On 11-02-2023 20:37, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
I would like to contribute as a maintainer, taking care of an orphaned
package.
Welcome Priscila! Did you have a specific package in mind already? If
not I can offer you Xaos [1].
I recently adopted that package for someone else who wanted to be
Thank you for fixing USD build and taking care of openpgl. I will handle both
blender and luxcorerender.
On 2023-02-11 12:04 p.m., Ben Beasley wrote:
There are API changes in Embree 4 that are likely to require source code
changes in dependent packages.
I’ve patched USD to compile with Embre
Hi Fedorians,
I've been working on a repoquerying tool called fedrq [1] that I'd like
to share with you. Here's the elevator pitch: fedrq provides a friendly
interface to query the Fedora repositories. It makes it really easy to
query across Fedora and EPEL branches. It uses the dnf Python binding
28 matches
Mail list logo
