Dne 06. 02. 23 v 1:13 Georg Sauthoff napsal(a):
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 02:45:23PM -0300, Mathias Zavala wrote:
I’m sorry for not answering sooner! I’ll be glad to receive help with the
current state of the package. Thanks in advance
you are a datamash Fedora package maintainer?
Judgi
I have just learned the hard way that `fedpkg import` does not work with
`rpmautospec` and that is show stopper for me. I have reported ticket here:
https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/655
And won't try rpmautospec again until this is resolved.
Vít
Dne 30. 12. 22 v 20:01 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
htt
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230205.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230206.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 119
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 59.91 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:13:11PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:14 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:36:52AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > ocaml-dose3 orphan 2 weeks
> > > ago
> > > ocaml-mccs
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023, 12:44 Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I have just learned the hard way that `fedpkg import` does not work with
> `rpmautospec` and that is show stopper for me. I have reported ticket here:
>
> https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/655
I ran into this myself and found its a bit less of an issue
So I think related to this thread, libvirt is now uninstallable in
Rawhide:
DEBUG util.py:443: Error:
DEBUG util.py:443: Problem: problem with installed package
fedora-release-38-0.23.noarch
DEBUG util.py:443:- package
iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.4-8.git2a8f9d8.fc38.x86_64 requires (fed
On 2023-02-06 07:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Why was this line added?
+ Requires: (fedora-release > 38-0.23 if fedora-release)
I suppose it's related to this change in fedora-release:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/c/096fc7da49de5655db7aad17057e32191f2afe59?branch=rawhide
=
#fedora-meeting: Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG
=
Meeting started by kalev at 15:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-06/flatpak-sig.2023-02-06-15
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately this week, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since this
On 06. 02. 23 17:14, Kalev Lember wrote:
* libmodulemd1 (kalev, 15:26:37)
* yselkowitz[m] to look into fixing libmodulemd1 FTBFS (kalev,
15:40:02)
* Owen to talk to Jan to see how far along fedmod replacement is
(kalev, 15:40:28)
* ACTION: tpopela to to talk to Jan to see ho
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 17:25 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 06. 02. 23 17:14, Kalev Lember wrote:
> >
> > * libmodulemd1 (kalev, 15:26:37)
> > * yselkowitz[m] to look into fixing libmodulemd1 FTBFS (kalev,
> > 15:40:02)
> > * Owen to talk to Jan to see how far along fedmod replacement
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:56:50AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-02-06 07:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Why was this line added?
> >
> > + Requires: (fedora-release > 38-0.23 if fedora-release)
> >
> > I suppose it's related to this change in fedora-release:
> >
> > https://src.fedo
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I plan to orphan the packages now, so maintainers who want to fix them can
take them, and rerun the check later this week.
It is not enough to unorphan a package to save it from retirement, it must
also be built in rawhide.
In case you want to postpone a
Hello, the mass branching of Fedora Linux 38 was planned to happen on
2023-02-07.
Due to traveling from FOSDEM and the re-signing of rawhide with a new
key we will postpone the branching to 2023-02-08.
Sorry for the inconvenience
Tomas Hrcka
Fedora release engineering
14 matches
Mail list logo
