On Friday, 03 February 2023 at 05:20, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> As a heads up - openmpi 5.0.0 drops support for 32-bit builds [1]. I'm not
> sure how far away it is from release - we're on rc10 at the moment.
[...]
> Personally I've been planning on dropping 32-bit support in a buch of
> packages I
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following comment has been added to the systemd-253~rc2-2.fc38 update:
>Bugs: 2156900 - None
> Notes: Automatic update for systemd-253~rc2-2.fc38. # **Changelog**
>: ``` * Thu Feb 2 202
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:20 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> As a heads up - openmpi 5.0.0 drops support for 32-bit builds [1]. I'm
> not sure how far away it is from release - we're on rc10 at the moment.
>
> Affected packages seem to be:
>
> amg4psblas-1.1.0-4.fc38.src.rpm
> arbor-0.7-4.fc38.src.r
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 14:17:36 -0600
Justin Forbes wrote:
> As the MR is now merged, it is a good time to make sure that everyone
> is aware. As of 6.2-rc5, Rawhide is no longer forcing a debug build
> with any kernels. All rawhide kernels are now built just like stable
> Fedora kernels, with both n
Hi all,
I recently received a bug report
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166454) about
proftpd not being able to load a dynamic module (mod_rewrite) that
provides some optional functionality. This module is not used by
default and has to be enabled manually. The ticket was raised for
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 14:17:36 -0600
> Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> > As the MR is now merged, it is a good time to make sure that everyone
> > is aware. As of 6.2-rc5, Rawhide is no longer forcing a debug build
> > with any kernels. All rawhide kernel
I've got a couple updates with missing tests:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-96ebcd6f4d
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-23e26fcc32
it seems like I used to have the option to resubmit the tests but I
don't see that now. Is my only option to waive the tes
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 08:03:10 -0600
Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 14:17:36 -0600
> > Justin Forbes wrote:
> >
> > > As the MR is now merged, it is a good time to make sure that everyone
> > > is aware. As of 6.2-rc5, Rawhide is n
V Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:40:09AM -0700, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
> I've got a couple updates with missing tests:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-96ebcd6f4d
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-23e26fcc32
>
That happens when CI is slow or broken. Or when
I took over libgit2 from Igor when he gave up all his packages and have since tried to get it up to date. libgit2 is a bit special because it bumps soname every once in a while and then other packages often fail to rebuild against the new version both because of libgit2 API changes and because they
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:45 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
> tpm2-tss-engine mzavalavz
No longer FTBFS. It can be removed from the
to be retired list.
Thanks!
__
I have just realized, that the rpmautospec is not documented in the
guidelines (unless my search-fu is failing me). Therefore I consider it
strange that we should go from "no documentation at all" to "use it by
default". I don't think this is right.
IOW why is it not documented yet as an optio
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 11:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > The following comment has been added to the systemd-253~rc2-2.fc38 update:
>
> >Bugs: 2156900 - None
> > Notes: Automatic update for s
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:53 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:16 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:37:44PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > Now I'm getting bit by the rpmautospec and COPR issue.
>>
>> Please be more precise. How are you b
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I have just realized, that the rpmautospec is not documented in the
> guidelines (unless my search-fu is failing me). Therefore I consider it
> strange that we should go from "no documentation at all" to "use it by
> default". I don't think thi
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:32:20PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> It's a 1:1 copy of the update "notes" from bodhi (except re-flowed to
> fit into however many columns plain-text emails support).
> So it's "markdown", not "awful", but sometimes it's hard to see the
> difference ;)
> Not sure if
On 2/3/23 8:04 AM, Pete Walter wrote:
> I took over libgit2 from Igor when he gave up all his packages and have
> since tried to get it up to date. libgit2 is a bit special because it
> bumps soname every once in a while and then other packages often fail to
> rebuild against the new version both b
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:05 PM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> Today, we have 3 versions in rawhide (libgit2 was updated from 1.3.x to 1.4.x
> and then 1.5.x over the last month and the compat packages were added today):
>
> libgit2 package with version 1.5.1 (security supported still from upstream)
> lib
Hi,
I've prepared rebase of poppler to 23.02.0, which was released
yesterday, in the side tag "f38-build-side-62722". I'm asking you to
build your dependent packages in it and I will merge it to the main
buildroot at Monday (6th of February) just before the branching.
There are several API c
On 2/3/23 08:16, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:40:09AM -0700, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
I've got a couple updates with missing tests:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-96ebcd6f4d
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-23e26fcc32
That happens when
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2023-02-06
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time! Quite a lot of stuff is landing in Rawhide at the
moment, and the F38 branch is com
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:27:06PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> Thanks, but no go:
>
> bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2023-96ebcd6f4d
> Login successful!
> Traceback (most recent call last):
This may well be because those updates are in a updates push right now
and the updates are locke
> Packages which need to be rebuilt:
> calligra
> gambas3
> gdal
> gdcm
> inkscape
> kf5-kitinerary
> libreoffice
> pdf2djvu
> scribus
Poppler update almost always results in rebuilding TeXLive (due to pdfTeX) too.
I was wondering how the ‘bootstrap’ build is done when that happ
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> A PackageKit backend for dnf5 would also work and I have no doubt it
> will happen regardless. Surely that'd be the best option for Fedora if
> dnfdaemon does not have the same D-Bus API that PackageKit does,
> because pushing dnf-specific code into upstream projects when
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> You don't even need to file paperwork for excluding i686 anymore since
> this happened:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
But openmpi is not a leaf package, so this fast-track process does not
apply.
Kevin Kofler
__
25 matches
Mail list logo
