Hi
I'd need mingw-python-pyproject-hooks reviewed: it is required by
mingw-python-build, which is currently FTI and hence preventing any
mingw-python-* package from getting built.
Review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163339
Should be a very easy one. Happy to review i
On Fr, 20.01.23 14:04, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, at 11:53 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 2023-01-19 00:55, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>
> >> What you could do is split up the problem: have iscsi-starter.service
> >> or so, that is separate from the i
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230122.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230123.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 79
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 893.59 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
I corrected a License tag in perl-PDF-Builder-3.025-1.fc38 from
"LGPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT" to "LGPL-2.1-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
Hi,
I've been looking at our upstreamed test [1] for libarchive package and it
started to fail since Fedora 37.
The error is: "gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined
"
Prior to the Fedora 37 the test was passing without any issue.
Did anyone here had a similar problem?
Or
Lukas Javorsky wrote on 2023/01/23 21:39:
Hi,
I've been looking at our upstreamed test [1] for libarchive package and it
started to fail since Fedora 37.
The error is: "gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined
"
Prior to the Fedora 37 the test was passing without any issue
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/01/23 21:54:
Lukas Javorsky wrote on 2023/01/23 21:39:
Hi,
I've been looking at our upstreamed test [1] for libarchive package and it
started to fail since Fedora 37.
The error is: "gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined
"
Prior to the Fedora
The entire project remains (SPDX) MIT, except:
- versioneer.py is Unlicense (but is not packaged in the binary RPMs)
- snakemake/_version.py says:
This file is released into the public domain.
which would be LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain, except that the comments
in versioneer.py make i
F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d823c8dfb8
F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8362bcf475
One package which is known to depend on the exact version of xz is
perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma. The updates above should do the right thing.
As far as I'm aware th
Hello,
since i encountered this in the past and postponed it, I did a bit of a
digging and found this:
As you probably found out by now it is caused by package-notes being
dependent
on environment variables that are expected to be present during package
build.
See the actual package-notes file cont
In one week (2022-01-30), or slightly later, I plan to build flatbuffers
23.1.21 for Rawhide[1].
Since upstream offers no ABI stability guarantees, the .so version is
now the same as the full calendar-based package version[2]. The .so
version is therefore bumped from 23 to 23.1.21.
Since fla
=
#fedora-meeting: Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG
=
Meeting started by kalev at 15:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-01-23/flatpak-sig.2023-01-23-15
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 38 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux
38 on 1. 18, 2023. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 38 for:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_flags
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointe
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:24 AM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora Linux 38 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux
> 38 on 1. 18, 2023. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 38 for:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_fla
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:05AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>
> Can somebody cancel the bigloo build? It's been running for several
> days and is obviously off in the weeds. I'll investigate.
Done.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Things still needing rebuilding
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html
What is the significance of packages that appear on this list?
ocaml-mysql appears there, and it does not look like a rebuild was
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > Things still needing rebuilding
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html
>
> What is the significance of packages that appear on th
I wanted to resubmit one of my failed builds, but the buildroot seems to be
broken currently:
> Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.14.0-2.fc38.noarch requires libmodulemd >=
> 2.9.3, but none of the providers can be installed
> - package libmodulemd-2.14.0-5.fc38.x86_64 requires
> libglib-2.0.so
I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:34 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <
s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I wanted to resubmit one of my failed builds, but the buildroot seems to
> be broken currently:
>
> > Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.14.0-2.fc38.no
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again).
We untagged it in december, but looks like no one followed up to get
dependent packages rebuilt:
https://pagu
To close out on this thread the WASM Sig has been set up and you can join the
wasm-...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/wasm-sig.lists.fedoraproject.org/
Zuzana has also set up an associated Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/WASM
We'
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > Things still needing rebuilding
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-reb
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > Things still needing rebuilding
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-reb
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:09:24PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > > Things still needi
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:48:31PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-01-22 14:35, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > What do I misunderstand about systemd presets?
>
> ... actually, the systemd presets look like they *don't* need to be
> adjusted. I reverted the change I thought the presets needed,
The OCaml package encodes the compiler flags into dependencies --
which is done for fairly accidental reasons.
Because the compiler flags changed, combined with the builds being
done out of order, means that most of the packages now have broken
deps.
Will fix ...
Rich.
-
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:25 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The OCaml package encodes the compiler flags into dependencies --
> which is done for fairly accidental reasons.
>
> Because the compiler flags changed, combined with the builds being
> done out of order, means that most of the packages n
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:28:57PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:25 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > The OCaml package encodes the compiler flags into dependencies --
> > which is done for fairly accidental reasons.
> >
> > Because the compiler flags changed, combined with
On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 19:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > > Things still nee
Hey folks!
The desktop team kindly let us know that there's a fairly significant
PackageKit update coming. It's been built for Rawhide today (so will be
in tomorrow's compose) and is now in updates-testing for F37:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6c1c40d160
what it does is re
On Mon, Jan 23 2023 at 04:28:27 PM -0800, Adam Williamson
wrote:
This feature has been turned on and off and on and off again a few
times before because it was found to cause problems. This time, a few
folks have done some diligent work trying to ensure all the
previously-
encountered problems
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:23 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f38-rebuild) and moved over to
> f38. Failures can be seen at
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-failures.html
pamix fixed in pamix-1.6-7.fc38.
P
_
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 7:43 PM Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:23 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f38-rebuild) and moved over to
> > f38. Failures can be seen at
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-failures.html
>
>
FYI:
mem
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> FYI:
>
> memkind failure (aarch64) seems to be koji/mock related:
>
> This package was updated and sucessfully built in rawhide and f37 a week
> ago (01/13)
>
> ---8<---
>
> EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> I found more 5 with
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng&state=active&view=tree&method=all&order=-id
>
> 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
>
> 964741
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 16:04 +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> libgps from the gpsd package had another ABI break. The following
> packages need to be rebuilt:
>
> collectd
> direwolf
> foxtrotgps
> marble
> plasma-workspace
> vfrnav
> viking
> xtide
>
> All packages rebuilt correctly for me locall
On 2023-01-23 16:36, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23 2023 at 04:28:27 PM -0800, Adam Williamson
wrote:
This feature has been turned on and off and on and off again a few
times before because it was found to cause problems. This time, a few
folks have done some diligent work trying to en
After the mass rebuild, some of my packages requiring fpc are now FTB because
fpc-units are not installed in the buildroot.
Sorry to not have caught this before, but the change proposal should have
included the necessary BuildRequire change for all dependent packages.
Moreover, having the units
I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:
error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
I must patch sources now?
sed -i 's|stdint.h|cstdint|' include/tins/ip_address.h
вт, 24 янв. 2023 г. в 05:52, Kevin Fenzi :
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> I have some packages failed.
> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
>
> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
>
> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
Some libstdc++ h
On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:
error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#he
41 matches
Mail list logo
