Hi,
> > While being at it: anaconda seems to explicitly call dracut to
> > generate
> > the initrd (according to the messages it prints). What is the reason
> > for this? Shouldn't this already happen as part of the rpm
> > transaction,
> > when the kernel install scripts are running?
> IIRC t
V Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> Have we made sure that when Red Hat forks Fedora packages for RHEL
> that they don't truncate or eliminate the Git history anymore? Because I would
> personally be very displeased if my historical attribution went away
> because of br
On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
- fedpkg mockbuild
But it doesn't work correctly (will always use Release: 1) if you run
"rpmbuild -bs foo-bar.spec" which is a very common scenario.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
On 01/01/2023 15:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
COPR seems to work in some cases, specifically with the dist-git build
(but not just building from dist-git).
Run "rpmbuild -bs foo-bar.spec", upload it to COPR and it will use
Release: 1.
I also need to figure out if it works with building from SCM
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 1:45 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 11:46 -0600, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote:
I went ahead and took vim-nerdtree.
Oh, I have noticed vim-nerdtree was orpahned. But it is not surprising,
since all Slavek's packages were. Thank you for picking it up
On 03/01/2023 09:30, Petr Pisar wrote:
Different number of commits will mean different release numbers. That will
break package interdependencies which requires a specific release number. E.g
foo requires bar.
Good point. Hard-coded release numbers are a serious problem even in Fedora.
We have
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 9:37 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 1:45 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 11:46 -0600, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote:
I went ahead and took vim-nerdtree.
Oh, I have noticed vim-nerdtree was orpahned. But it is not
surprising, since all Slav
> Am 30.12.2022 um 19:45 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
>
> We need to be cautious about
> not being able to personally picture why someone would use an existing
> default and overriding it casually, and inflicting our new logic on
> the unsuspecting existing userbase.
+1!
--
Peter Boy
https:/
The package python-flask-whooshee changed license from GPLv2+ to BSD-3-Clause.
The change actually happened in upstream after version 0.3.0 (and we have now
0.8.2).
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > - fedpkg mockbuild
>
> But it doesn't work correctly (will always use Release: 1) if you run
> "rpmbuild -bs foo-bar.spec" which is a very common scenario.
"Doct
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > - fedpkg mockbuild
> >
> > But it doesn't work correctly (will alway
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-01-03 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be d
On 03. 01. 23 10:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Title of issue
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/###
DECISION (+X, Y, -Z)
There was no actual issue supposed to be listed here instead of the
placeholder, it was merely redundant.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_
On 03. 01. 23 10:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Change: Use mdadm for BIOS RAID Support in Anaconda
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2922
A decision has not yet been made officially for this one, I copy pasted it to
the email and forgot to remove it before I sent it. Sorry about that.
--
Miro Hrončok
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
…
> Change: Use mdadm for BIOS RAID Support in Anaconda
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2922
Something went wrong here. The tally is +4,0,0 on this one.
The ticket wasn't closed.
Zbyszek
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230102.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230103.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hi all,
I would like to ask a question about whether the workflow below, which I
use frequently, can be used in packages which uses rpmautospec. I hit
this when I was doing a testing scratch build of another package which
already switched to rpmautospec and since rpmautospec is now proposed to
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Miroslav Lichvar:
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libform.so.6: undefined reference to
> > `wmove@NCURSES6_5.0.19991023'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libform.so.6: undefined reference to
> > `derwin@NCURSES6_5.0.19991023'
> > /usr/bin
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 12:00:21PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to ask a question about whether the workflow below, which I use
> frequently, can be used in packages which uses rpmautospec. I hit this when
> I was doing a testing scratch build of another package which alr
* Miroslav Lichvar:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Miroslav Lichvar:
>> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libform.so.6: undefined reference to
>> > `wmove@NCURSES6_5.0.19991023'
>> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libform.so.6: undefined reference to
>> > `derwin@NCURSES
Hi,
our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
llvm/clang while mock build has the new version of clang/llvm (15.0.1).
there is bug in llvm 14.0.6 that causes linking error when building
chromium. The bug was fixed in llvm-15.x.
Is it possible to get new version of ll
On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 19:02, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Version: 1.2.3
> Release: %autorelease
> %autochangelog
I tied this on a package this morning and got:
BuildError: Error running GIT command "git clone -n
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fwupd.git
/var/lib/mock/f38-build-4075-4953952/root/
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, January 3rd, 2023 at 2:22 AM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 7:21 PM Dale Turner via devel
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned last week, I would be interested i
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > - fedpkg mockbuild
> >
> > But it doesn't work correctly (will always use Release: 1) if yo
On 26-12-2022 19:18, Dale Turner via devel wrote:
The main reason for me finally posting to this list is that I noticed
xaos is now unmaintained. I am not in the Packager group, but I think
I would be able to maintain this package, or at least assist. It is
not critical to any system, but is inte
On 02-01-2023 19:21, Dale Turner via devel wrote:
As I mentioned last week, I would be interested in xaos. BUT, I am
not presently a packager/maintainer...
I've taken xaos for safekeeping as explained in my reply to Dale's
introduction.
-- Sandro
_
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > > - fedpkg mockbuild
>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:14:04 -0500
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > - fedpkg mockbuild
>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 07:55, Than Ngo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
> llvm/clang while mock build has the new version of clang/llvm (15.0.1).
> there is bug in llvm 14.0.6 that causes linking error when building
> chromium. The bug was fixed
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:24 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:14:04 -0500
> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > > On 02/01/2023 21:44
* Stephen Smoogen:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > - fedpkg mockbuild
> >
> > But it doesn't work correctly (w
* Richard Hughes:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 19:02, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> Version: 1.2.3
>> Release: %autorelease
>> %autochangelog
>
> I tied this on a package this morning and got:
>
> BuildError: Error running GIT command "git clone -n
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fwupd.git
> /var/lib/moc
* Than Ngo:
> our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
> llvm/clang while mock build has the new version of clang/llvm
> (15.0.1).
> there is bug in llvm 14.0.6 that causes linking error when building
> chromium. The bug was fixed in llvm-15.x.
>
> Is it possible to get
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 08:14, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > > - fed
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 13:46, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > BuildError: Error running GIT command "git clone -n
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fwupd.git
> > /var/lib/mock/f38-build-4075-4953952/root/chroot_tmpdir/scmroot/fwupd",
> > see checkout.log for details
> | fatal: the remote end hun
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 14:20 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szm
On 1/3/23 12:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Is this doable with rpmautospec and if it is, how?
The desired effect can be implemented by overriding %dist:
%global dist %dist~test.0
Release: %autorelease
Notice that I used '~' to make the redefined %dist _lower_ than the original
it is the standard mock build (centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64) which
includes centos-stream-9 and epel-9 repo.
Thanks,
Than
Am 03.01.23 um 14:47 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Than Ngo:
our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
llvm/clang while mock build has the new versio
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 03:50:10PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 03. 01. 23 v 14:20 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:21 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 03:50:10PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 03. 01. 23 v 14:20 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Stephen Smoogen
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 20
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 14:16 Sandro napsal(a):
On 26-12-2022 19:18, Dale Turner via devel wrote:
The main reason for me finally posting to this list is that I noticed
xaos is now unmaintained. I am not in the Packager group, but I think
I would be able to maintain this package, or at least assist. It
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 4:30 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
Fabio Valentini wrote:
- incompatible compile-time options (i.e. resulting in conditional
compilation): different packages depend on crates with different sets
of features enabled, sometimes with conflicting options. Even with a
stable ABI,
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 16:24 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:21 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 03:50:10PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 03. 01. 23 v 14:20 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 3 Ja
On Monday, January 2, 2023 7:25:39 PM CST Robby Callicotte wrote:
> On January 2, 2023 6:45:53 PM CST, Maxwell G wrote:
> >On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 11:46 -0600, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote:
> >> I went ahead and took vim-nerdtree.
> >
> >FYI: Nerdtree is unmaintained upstream:
> >https://github.
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2023-01-03)
===
Meeting started by mhroncok at 17:01:53 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-01-03/fesco.2023-01-03-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
(once again with a proper Subject line)
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2023-01-03)
===
Meeting started by mhroncok at 17:01:53 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-01-03/fesco.2023-
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Yes, this is what I was talking about too. Because rpmbuild does not set
> %_sourcedir, it may fail to load some files. Even worse, it may load *wrong*
> versions, e.g. when some old version is present in the ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/.
> Personally, I have dozens of s
I will gladly take it, and any co-maintainers are welcome as well.
Thank you for your contributions to dlib as well.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:11 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I am orphaning dlib as I no longer need it for dependencies like howdly
> (Windows Hello type authentic
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 4:43 AM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 09:57 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 02. 01. 23 v 9:38 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> > > produces bogus changelog messages and artificially
> > > inflates Release counters.
> >
> > I always wond
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 5:56 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Monday, 02 January 2023 at 09:57, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 02. 01. 23 v 9:38 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> > > produces bogus changelog messages and artificially
> > > inflates Release counters.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:30 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > Have we made sure that when Red Hat forks Fedora packages for RHEL
> > that they don't truncate or eliminate the Git history anymore? Because I
> > would
> > personally be very
Kalev Lember kirjoitti 3.1.2023 klo 11.19:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
- fedpkg mockbuild
But it does
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:27 PM Otto Liljalaakso
wrote:
> Kalev Lember kirjoitti 3.1.2023 klo 11.19:
> > We might need to update package maintainer documents to be clear about
> this
> > though, so that people know that they should use 'fedpkg srpm' and not
> > 'rpmbuild -bs'.
>
> In Package Main
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:02 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:30 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > V Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > > Have we made sure that when Red Hat forks Fedora packages for RHEL
> > > that they don't truncate or eliminate the Git
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 5:11 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:02 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:30 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >
> > > V Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > > > Have we made sure that when Red Hat forks Fedora packa
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 5:10 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:02 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:30 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >
> > > V Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > > > Have we made sure that when Red Hat forks Fedora packa
Dan Horák kirjoitti 3.1.2023 klo 15.23:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:14:04 -0500
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
Could you please elucidate why the command that people have used for nearly
30 years and is the most documented on how to build rpms is broken? And how
people should use instead when they may be de
On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 14:37 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Summary--
> Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
> containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
> updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly
> become
> stale as a Fe
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:30:33AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This might not be as niche as you might think. I'm one of the
> Linux kernel maintainers for s390. Many of us do the vast majority of
> their development work natively on s390 systems via SSH from Fedora
> laptops. Afte
On 1/3/23 18:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
But isn't missing inst.rescue boot option [2] ?
That's a different thing. The rescue kernel is only to have all kernel
modules available. The "inst.rescue" mode is available on netinst
images (and maybe others?) and boots an actual rescue mode that lets
60 matches
Mail list logo
