Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben Cotton wrote: This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. -1 until t

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 12:49:57AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > -1 for this change. > > > I will ignore it if it's accepted. > > > > That's OK, the idea

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 07:56:05PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > -1 for this change. > > > I will ignore it if it's accepted. > > > > That's OK, the idea is

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30/12/2022 22:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in. It is already opt-in. Some packages switched to rpmautospec when it was introduced. I've done this too for some of my packages and due to known issues reverted back to classic behavior due to

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 30/12/22 20:01, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default > I'm lazy, so I usually just 'git merge rawhide' in other branches... what's the support status of rpmautospec for EPEL? Last time I tried, it wasn't working in EPEL8. Mattia ___

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221231.n.0 changes

2022-12-31 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221230.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221231.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 140 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 51.39 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: HEADS UP: icu 72 coming to rawhide

2022-12-31 Thread Pete Walter
28.12.2022, 15:09, "Pete Walter" :Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 71.1 to 72.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is expected.

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rp

Re: HEADS UP: icu 72 coming to rawhide

2022-12-31 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Pete Walter wrote on 2022/12/31 22:30: 28.12.2022, 15:09, "Pete Walter" : Hi, I am in the process of updating icu from 71.1 to 72.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 9:07 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM B

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20221231.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2022-12-31 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20221231.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 31. 12. 22 15:07, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 31. 12. 22 15:07, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Rpmautospec (`%autorelease` and `%autochangelog`) is recommended as > > the default approach. > > Packaging Guidelines and other documentation are adjusted to describe > > this approach first. > > Various tools that provide

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 31. 12. 22 15:07, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > >> > > >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > >

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > tl;dr: you want to fix changelog entries. That's supported by saving the > generated changelog to 'changelog' file and doing whatever edits you want > there. > > With that approach, you can do arbitrary formatting and fixups. The > advantage compared to status

openvdb-10.0.1 available for both Rawhide and F37

2022-12-31 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Openvdb 10.0.1 is available on the respective side-tag https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=60909 and https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=60771&order=-build_id&latest=1. Notable feature is the backward compatibility with the previous 9.x series meaning the

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-12-31 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 13:40, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > tl;dr: you want to fix changelog entries. That's supported by saving the > > generated changelog to 'changelog' file and doing whatever edits you want > > there. >