> Am 30.12.2022 um 06:59 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
>
>> Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
>>>
>>> It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default
>>> timeout for servers must remain unchanged.
>>
>> My problem is not "defined timeouts" it is systemd delaying shutd
> Am 29.12.2022 um 16:29 schrieb David Malcolm :
>
> On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 13:03 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a):
> When the connection fails, the Xserve
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221229.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221230.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.78 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 12/30/22 06:59, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
You've apparently not encountered the corruption of a database under
heavy load where the cache where swapspace has not yet been propagated
to disk. Imagine a server running a lot of virtual machines for an
image of what an overly aggressive shutdown t
On 12/29/22 20:27, John Reiser wrote:
A years-earlier "by-hand" example of related coding in plain-C is
scripts/recordmcount.c in the source code for Linux kernel.
Yep, functions like htonl have been in use in C for decades.
It is sad to see this standardization to little-endian (e.g. ppc64->
On Fri, Dec 30 2022 at 10:42:29 AM +0100, Peter Boy
wrote:
But the **default* values must provide the most safe operation
possible and not require any intervention from the system
administrator to achieve that.
I think we need to find some way for Workstation to have different
defaults than
I'm interested in following along with this as well. Just learning about
WebAssembly's potential at the moment. It does seem that a currently missing
component is to harness fedora's infrastructure to build wasm targets and
distribute wasm artifacts. Capturing the steps necessary to build and re
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:59:19AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 7:01 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >
> > Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
> > >
> > > It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default
> > > timeout for servers must remain unchang
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:02 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:59:19AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 7:01 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
> > > >
> > > > It is a good idea to make the timeout configura
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering C
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NotoFontsForMoreLang
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committe
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F38-FPC-repackaging
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Comm
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only b
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be imple
-1 for this change.
I will ignore it if it's accepted.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-o
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
> Have we made sure that when Red Hat forks Fedora packages for RHEL
> that they don't truncate or eliminate the Git his
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> -1 for this change.
> I will ignore it if it's accepted.
That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in.
Without any specific concerns, that's all I can say.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- de
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
> > Have we made sure that when Red Hat fork
> Rpmautospec (`%autorelease` and `%autochangelog`) is recommended as
> the default approach.
> Packaging Guidelines and other documentation are adjusted to describe
> this approach first.
> Various tools that provide spec file templates are adjusted.
-1 to this proposal.
As I had already written
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > -1 for this change.
> > I will ignore it if it's accepted.
>
> That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in.
So if the change is opt-in how is this an actual chang
On 12/30/22 14:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
>>
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>> communi
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > -1 for this change.
> > I will ignore it if it's accepted.
>
> That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in.
> Without any specific concerns, that's all I can say.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 7:57 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 12/30/22 14:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
> >>
> >> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Can we please have gcc-rs also built (even though it's experimental)?
Will gcc-rs be able to generate usable shared libraries for Rust crates?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:37 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Can we please have gcc-rs also built (even though it's experimental)?
>
> Will gcc-rs be able to generate usable shared libraries for Rust crates?
>
If someone were to spend the time to build the functionality
Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 38.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users an
27 matches
Mail list logo
