On 04/12/2022 20:25, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I don't indent change /usr/bin/convert from ImageMagick6 so probably it
will /usr/bin/convert-7
Such name change is not a good idea, because /usr/bin/convert and all
other ImageMagick binaries are used in many scripts and SPECs. You must
provide symbol
On 04/12/2022 20:48, Neal Gompa wrote:
I would prefer that*every* build would automatically generate a side
tag, even if it's a side-tag of one package.
No, please. Koji is already dying with 100 side tags regeneration (check
my first message in this thread). When there will be 1000+ we will
On 05/12/2022 02:36, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Can those be fixed?
I doubt. All side tags must be regenerated after each build in it or
after each global buildroot override, which is a very slow process.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
_
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 12:05:59AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:02 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 19:27 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The examples you provide are definitely interesting. They all
> > > > essentially boi
Dne 04. 12. 22 v 20:27 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 03:35:31PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 00:14 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:30 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
So there's this CI ticket ATM[0] about whether the env
Dne 03. 12. 22 v 17:25 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
with
ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications use only ImageMagick
7,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 Adam Williamson wrote:
I may think about having openQA Rawhide update tests enable the
buildroot repo that includes packages from the release tag; this would
make it include packages that have gone 'stable' since the previous
Rawhide compose. I'd have to think if there are an
On 05. 12. 22 11:03, Vít Ondruch wrote:
It seems that all the mentioned issues are about the (upcoming) stable
releases. But I think Rawhide is different and maybe overrides does not make a
sense there.
There are no buildroot overrides for rawhide.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC:
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
The report could be found at
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update-week-48-2022/.
If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please
subscribe to either https://communit
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hi,
With the latest release of Fedora37 we were hit with an issue where the
ncurses-compat-libs RPM had been depreciated. Due to this some of the
tools we use would no longer install from their respective RPM's or
their tar based installs would not run as they needed the
libncurses*5.so share
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 06:45, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the latest release of Fedora37 we were hit with an issue where the
> ncurses-compat-libs
> RPM had been depreciated. Due to this some of the tools we use would no
> longer install from their respective RPM's or their tar based inst
On 05/12/2022 12:39, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I am wondering what Fedora's policy is on depreciated old shared
libraries and particularly compat RPM's ?
Fedora is a bleeding edge distribution. If you need old versions, you
should try CentOS or RHEL.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycod
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221204.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221205.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 58
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 121.98 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Taking these
mingw-dbus orphan 1 weeks ago
mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols orphan, smani 1 weeks ago
mingw-xerces-c orphan 1 weeks ago
Can take this if no-one else is interested (@Sergio Basto?)
> docker-compose lsm5, orphan, t
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 5th
December(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC
(Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedorapro
* Miro Hrončok [05/12/2022 12:36] :
>
> perl-App-PFT orphan 1 weeks ago
> perl-File-KeePass cra, echevemaster, orphan, 0 weeks ago
> xavierb
> perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authenorphan
On 05. 12. 22 12:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned...
Package (co)maintainers Status
Change
python-argon2-cffi atim, epel-package
* Stephen Smoogen:
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 is reaching its EOL in 1 year and 29
> weeks. Getting code to compile for it on newer OS's is harder and
> packagers volunteer time is limited.
For official information on support life-cycles, please consider this
official resource:
Red Hat Enter
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:01 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2022 12:39, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> > I am wondering what Fedora's policy is on depreciated old shared
> > libraries and particularly compat RPM's ?
>
> Fedora is a bleeding edge distribution. If you need old versions, you
>From gamescope perspective, a new release would require wlroot 0.16 (commit
is already present in master), so can you cc me whenever you do wlroot 0.16
in bodhi? I'd either backport the specific commit/or a new release and add
it to the update.
I'll handle rawhide when we have a new release or wh
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 08:56, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Smoogen:
>
> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 is reaching its EOL in 1 year and 29
> > weeks. Getting code to compile for it on newer OS's is harder and
> > packagers volunteer time is limited.
>
> For official information on support life
lanned Outage - IAD2 Outage - 2022-12-08 19:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2022-12-08 19:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-12-08 19:00 UTC'
Reas
I've taken python-humblewx, buildbot, php-adodb.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
htt
On 12/5/22 14:57, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:01 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
On 05/12/2022 12:39, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I am wondering what Fedora's policy is on depreciated old shared
libraries and particularly compat RPM's ?
Fedora is a bleeding edge distribution
IMO, buildroot overrides are devil, because may have impact on builds performed
by other unaware users. The reported examples may be handled by sidetags or
requesting exceptions to releng:
Il 03/12/22 00:14, Kalev Lember ha scritto:
> However, having said that, I also find buildroot overrides u
I’d be willing to take Toilet, as I love that utility.
On 5 Dec 2022, at 5:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 01:28:28PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Miro Hrončok [05/12/2022 12:36] :
> >
> > perl-App-PFT orphan 1 weeks
> > ago
> > perl-File-KeePass cra, echevemaster, orphan, 0 weeks
> > ago
> >
Good afternoon/morning everyone,
I'm a co-packager for Lutris, and the newest version (0.5.12) had a couple
more package requirements, one of which is pypresence, which isn't packaged
with Fedora.
I created a review request here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150506 if anyone could
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-12-06 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be d
* Chuck Anderson [05/12/2022 13:06] :
>
> Would you lke to take perl-Term-ShellUI as well? It is a dependency
> of kpcli which requires perl-File-KeePass. Otherwise I'm happy to
> take it.
Taken as well. Co-maintainers are welcome.
Emmanuel
___
devel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_flags
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the F
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:58 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> * Release engineering: Mass rebuild required
Please file a ticket with Release Engineering if you haven't already.
> == Contingency Plan ==
> * Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) If too many
> packages are found to be broken
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:58 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_flags
>
It is my vague recollection (I could easily be wrong, so
correct me as appropriate) that _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3
adds some runtime overhead that did not apply
It's a low-level package only built for i686. If it actually works on
x86-64 kernels, it should be built as an x86-64 package, too. If it
doesn't work on x86-64 kernels, I don't see why we should keep building
it.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 4:01 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> It's a low-level package only built for i686. If it actually works on
> x86-64 kernels, it should be built as an x86-64 package, too. If it
> doesn't work on x86-64 kernels, I don't see why we should keep building
> it.
>
The only use I c
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Or let's just get rid of Bodhi and trust all packagers to "know exactly
> what they are doing with their package".
Yes please!
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 05/12/2022 12:39, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> I am wondering what Fedora's policy is on depreciated old shared
>> libraries and particularly compat RPM's ?
>
> Fedora is a bleeding edge distribution. If you need old versions, you
> should try CentOS or RHEL.
Or y
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 4:44 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > Or let's just get rid of Bodhi and trust all packagers to "know exactly
> > what they are doing with their package".
>
> Yes please!
>
NO! That way is madness! It penalizes fresh packagers too much
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 3:17 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:58 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_flags
> >
>
> It is my vague recollection (I could easily be wrong, so
> correct me as appropriate
On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 22:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > Or let's just get rid of Bodhi and trust all packagers to "know exactly
> > what they are doing with their package".
>
> Yes please!
Exhibits 1 through 2636 for why this is a bad idea:
https://bod
* Neal Gompa [04/12/2022 22:26] :
>
> Smooge challenged me earlier in this conversation to provide patches
> and effort, and I'm doing just that.
Thank you for doing this, btw.
Over the weekend, this became a discussion where none of the
participants seemed to be listening to the others and it be
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 6:38 PM Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa [04/12/2022 22:26] :
> >
> > Smooge challenged me earlier in this conversation to provide patches
> > and effort, and I'm doing just that.
>
> Thank you for doing this, btw.
>
> Over the weekend, this became a discussion where
Hi,
This is underwhelming and I have several questions inline
On 12/5/22 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_flags
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announc
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 10:53 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> It has a similar impact that turning back on frame pointers would.
>
> Cf.
> https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2022/09/17/gccs-new-fortification-level#the_gains_of_improved_security_coverage_outweigh_the_cost
>
That article explicitly sta
On 05/12/2022 16:00, Jarek Prokop wrote:
On 12/5/22 14:57, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:01 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
On 05/12/2022 12:39, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I am wondering what Fedora's policy is on depreciated old shared
libraries and particularly compat RPM'
46 matches
Mail list logo
