Hello,
> Where does this service currently run? If it's going to be used "in
> anger", perhaps it would be good to put it under fedora-infra control?
Currently running on my laptop. Unpackaged and with hardcoded configuration :-)
But I agree with you. I will soon create a Fedora infra issue and
d
On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package with
ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications use only ImageMagick 7,
we move the sources from ImageMagick7 to ImageMagick
I think it would be better to update the ImageMagick package
On 02/12/2022 22:30, Adam Williamson wrote:
1. Packages that have been pushed stable since the last time a compose
succeeded (for Rawhide that's a Rawhide compose, for Branched it's a
Branched compose, for stable releases it's an updates compose)
2. Packages that have active buildroot overrides
On 02/12/2022 23:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Not sure if we should turn them off entirely, but we could restrict
their use somewhat? For example, only allow people in "releng" or "qa"
groups to file them.
Strongly -1.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
On 02/12/2022 18:20, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
I started working on a service [2] that listens to fedora-messaging
and for every new RHBZ review ticket or a new comment with updated
packages, it submits a build in Copr. Thanks to this [1] feature, Copr
automatically runs the fedora-review tool and gen
> fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially
> licenses). It can't be fully automated.
That's true but my goal isn't to fully automate the process. A person
will always be required to take the final look and make sure the spec
is reasonably written and the package is ac
While in the process of updating celestia package to the latest
snapshot, I was trying to build it with qt interface and opengl_ES for
rendering. But looking at the build logs of qt6-qtbase:
OpenGL:
Desktop OpenGL ... yes
OpenGL ES 2.0 no
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 9:25 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> While in the process of updating celestia package to the latest
> snapshot, I was trying to build it with qt interface and opengl_ES for
> rendering. But looking at the build logs of qt6-qtbase:
> OpenGL:
> Desktop OpenGL ..
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
> > with
> > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications use only ImageMagick
> > 7,
> > we move the sources from Imag
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
> > > with
> > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all application
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022, 17:26 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
> > > with
> > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications us
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
> > > with
> > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applicati
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:34 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:34 AM Kalev Lember
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> >
Il 03/12/22 16:29, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> As far as I know, Qt can only be built with one mode or another. So
> it's a mutually exclusive choice. Also, it looks like we don't have
> the GLES libraries from Mesa at all to even make that choice. :(
So, why glxinfo on my system returns:
> OpenGL
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 12:43 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 03/12/22 16:29, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
>
>
> As far as I know, Qt can only be built with one mode or another. So
> it's a mutually exclusive choice. Also, it looks like we don't have
> the GLES libraries from Mesa at all to even
I created the Fedora Infra ticket
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11028
Jakub
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 1:00 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> > fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially
> > licenses). It can't be fully automated.
>
> That's true but my goal isn
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221202.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221203.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
107.0.1 build for
F37/x86_64: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bojan/FF/
If you want/need or are obsessive about version numbers, like yours
truly. ;-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Thanks! labwc and wayfire updated for Rawhide [1]. Please ping when you
consider new wlroots 0.16 mature enough and start updating it for f37.
[1]:
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9bac007398
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1bbf74fbb8
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
