V Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:01:54AM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
> To clarify -- while SPDX license strings are not valid for RHEL 9, are
> they valid for EPEL 9?
>
Yes. Fedora packaging guidelines also apply to EPEL.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
V Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:53:09PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> There are two common ways to find out what SPDX identifier you should use in
> such cases.
>
>
> 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> identify your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugi
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> We currently don't use the initial-setup application in the main KDE
> Spin and Kinoite installation ISOs as everything gets configured at
> installation time via Anaconda.
While that's true, wouldn't it make sense to adjust Anaconda to requi
On 15. 11. 22 0:03, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
(Though actually, would %global __provides_exclude_from … together with a
manual Provides: python3dist(…) = 0 not work?)
I believe that %__provides_exclude_from would actually work.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:53:09PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> MIT and BSD are very common licenses and can be tricky to convert to SPDX
> license identifiers. Just today, I got two questions about it. We have this
> covered in FAQ
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_
We'll need to investigate this option. I've added it in
https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/243
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
Good point. We'll have to do that indeed.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Li
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221114.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221115.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:39
Upgraded packages: 99
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.40 MiB
Size of dropped packages
> == Summary ==
>
> We currently don't use the initial-setup application in the main KDE
> Spin and Kinoite installation ISOs as everything gets configured at
> installation time via Anaconda. We thus want to remove this package
> from the installation ISOs while keeping it where we currently need
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 03:24:07PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraSilverblueBootupd
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal wi
On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to identify
your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to select the
text; and in the context menu, you can choose to identify the license. It will
print, e.g., t
On 11/15/22 08:37, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 15/11/22 00:23, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:03 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
>> wrote:
>>> So let me sum up:
>>>
Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools, explicitly allow
creating package with version `0.0.0`
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
On 11/15/22 08:37, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 15/11/22 00:23, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:03 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
So let me sum up:
Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools, explicitl
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> > identify
> > your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to select
> > the
> > text; and in the c
Dne 15. 11. 22 v 10:44 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
Interestingly when I run 'license-fedora2spdx MIT' is just
always prints 'mpich2', and the list of suggestions is entirely
reversed from what you show here. Why 'mpich2' - it is simply
because it is last in the list to be loaded. This is rathe
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-11-15 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> > identify
> > your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to select
> > the
> > text; and in the c
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Do we have a command line tool for this? Does licensecheck support SPDX
>> identifiers?
>>
>> (I find the use of browser extension for this very weird. I have the LICENSE
>> file unpackaged with the sources on my machine, I
I had to back off updating OpenColorIO as it needed a newer version of
minizip-ng than what's available.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-518f2de934
The only fallout is supercollider which failed to build for other reasons:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID
This compat package was created when OpenColorIO 2 was "new" and a few
projects failed to build with it.
Currently USD is the only consumer and I was able to get it to build with
OCIO 2 just now. I'll wait a bit to see if there's any fallout and if not,
retire it within a week.
Thanks,
Richard
__
Timothée Ravier writes:
>> Bootloaders are not single files. Consider UEFI:
>>
>> For grub2, there's both a .efi and some configuration that I'll handwave
>> for purposes of this conversation. For shim, it's more like 4 things -
>> the main shim*64.efi, fallback.efi, boot.efi, and boot.csv. T
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Do we have a command line tool for this? Does licensecheck support SPDX
> >> identifiers?
> >>
> >> (I find the use of browser extension for this very weird. I
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Am I missing something obvious or does licensecheck not work
>> as expected? This is with licensecheck-3.3.0-2.fc36.noarch.
>
> licensecheck does not follow/use SPDX-License-Identifier at all. It
> predates that scheme
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:17 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >> Am I missing something obvious or does licensecheck not work
> >> as expected? This is with licensecheck-3.3.0-2.fc36.noarch.
> >
> > licensecheck does not
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.4. There
are just two small new things, a better --forcearch check and
the device-mapper control file is exposed in chroot. Full release notes:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-3.4
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-11-15/fesco.2022-11-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-11-15/fesco.2022-11-15-17.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-11-15/fesco.2022-11-15-17.00.log.html
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54:32PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
...snip...
I think we are going to just have to agree to disagree here.
I think we have had this discussion a number of times now and aren't
going to convince the other.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, at 11:41 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, at 6:08 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Ben Cotton writes:
>>
>>> By design, ostree does not manage bootloader updates as they can not
>>> (yet) happen in a transactional, atomic and safe fashion.
>>
>> As we've talked a
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 12:00 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> If your model doesn't permit the system to cease execution during
> bootloader updates, then I'm not sure why you need bootupd at all -
> traditional RPM updating will work just fine (assuming the A/B change
> we've been talking about).
"Colin Walters" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 12:00 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
>> If your model doesn't permit the system to cease execution during
>> bootloader updates, then I'm not sure why you need bootupd at all -
>> traditional RPM updating will work just fine (assuming the A/B change
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I think we are going to just have to agree to disagree here.
>
> I think we have had this discussion a number of times now and aren't
> going to convince the other.
So Bodhi will continue to become more and more unmaintainable due to piling
up more and more complicated rules
Following our scheduling policy around Fedora major version releases [1]
we will be rolling out the Fedora Linux 37 rebase over the next few weeks.
This rollout started earlier today with the `testing` stream.
Of note is that during this development cycle we were promoted to an official
edition [2
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:29 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2022-11-16 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
After reading this thread and bz 2123998, I had thought that the Fedora
37 mesa packages retained accelerated video for open codecs (for AMD
hardware). However, the Fedora wiki[1] indicates that even open codecs
are no longer accelerated without third party packages. Is that true?
(I don't t
Richard Shaw wrote on 2022/11/16 1:10:
I had to back off updating OpenColorIO as it needed a newer version of
minizip-ng than what's available.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-518f2de934
The only fallout is supercollider which failed to build for other reasons:
https://koji
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 8:23 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it
>>to identify your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and
>>allows you to select the text; and in the context m
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 5:27 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> After reading this thread and bz 2123998, I had thought that the Fedora
> 37 mesa packages retained accelerated video for open codecs (for AMD
> hardware). However, the Fedora wiki[1] indicates that even open codecs
> are no longer acceler
On 2022-11-15 15:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
This is not true. However, until recently, support for hardware
accelerated open codecs was limited to Intel QuickSync Video, which is
blocked on the VA-API driver landing in Fedora[1].
AMD VP9 decoding was added in VCN 1.0:
Sorry, I'm still not clear on
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 7:52 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2022-11-15 15:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > This is not true. However, until recently, support for hardware
> > accelerated open codecs was limited to Intel QuickSync Video, which is
> > blocked on the VA-API driver landing in Fedora[1].
> >
Dne 15. 11. 22 v 10:44 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
In that case, IMHO, the tool should NOT suggest a license from the
list at all, and definitely not arbitrarily suggest the last one it
loaded, which is highly likely to be wrong. If it wants to suggest,
then suggest the most likely option out o
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, 12:24 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> identify
> > your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to
> select the
> > text; and in the context menu
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> On 11/15/22 08:37, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > Il 15/11/22 00:23, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:03 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> >> wrote:
> >>> So let me sum up:
> >>>
> Some Python building backend
42 matches
Mail list logo
