Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

Hi Kevin, Hau idatzi du Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 uzt. 9, lr. (20:11)): > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > That said, until then I can try and run things o

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 07 November (Today)

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 7th November(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedorapro

Re: Planning to start unifying native and mingw packages

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 03:57:37PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:49 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:13:18PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm > > > pla

Re: Planning to start unifying native and mingw packages

On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 06:13:21PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 03.09.22 18:09, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 10:33 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 10:22 AM Sandro Mani > > wrote: > > > > > > On 03.09.22 17:10, Richard Shaw wrote: > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221107.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221106.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221107.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 28 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 56.49 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Fedora 37 compose report: 20221107.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20221106.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221107.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Heads-up: Side-tag rebuild due to minizip-ng soname bump

Hi, Minizip-ng has changed its soname name from "libminizip.so.3.0" to "libminizip.so.3" thus we need to rebuild all the packages that are requiring this soname. I've listed them with the following command: *dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libminizip.so.3*' --qf '%{sourcerpm}\t%{name}' | sed -e 's/

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20221107.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20221107.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Re: Heads-up: Side-tag rebuild due to minizip-ng soname bump

V Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Lukas Javorsky napsal(a): > Hi, > > Minizip-ng has changed its soname name from "libminizip.so.3.0" to > "libminizip.so.3" thus we need to rebuild all the packages that are > requiring this soname. > > I've listed them with the following command: *dnf repo

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

> On 11/1/22 07:38, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > Has adding kernel support for DWARF unwinding been considered instead? The references of the proposal has some discussion on this subject. Basically, this was already considered and rejected by the kernel developers including Torvalds directly

[Test-Announce] Help test backlight control changes on old laptops in the upcoming kernel

Hello, kernel 6.1 or 6.2 will change how laptop backlight is handled and it might negatively affect some laptops, especially older ones. Hans De Goede, the developer of that change, asks for wider community testing. Here are his blog posts containing all necessary instructions: * Part 1: https://

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Hau idatzi du Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 uzt. > 9, lr. (20:11)): > > > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fab

(Golang) Reviews swap pretty please

Hello, I need help to review the ORAS stack needed for Ariga and others: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140707 Review Request: golang-github-need-being-tree - Pretty print trees in Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140708 Review Request: golang-oras - Work with OCI

SPDX Change update

Tl;dr Please start migrating your license tag to SPDX now. Tool `license-fedora2spdx` is your friend. The JSON format changed - but is backwards compatible. Hi. I want to update you on where we are with SPDX Change https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1

Re: Self Introduction: Jeff Stewart

On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 01:18:23PM -0800, jeff stewart wrote: > Hello I am a Linux Systems Administrator at spacex, and have over 6 years > of IT experience. I love Linux and hope to learn from the best at fedora! I > am very willing to jump in and help anyway that I can. It will be nice to > talk

Re: [Test-Announce] Help test backlight control changes on old laptops in the upcoming kernel

Hi All, On 11/7/22 16:34, Kamil Paral wrote: > Hello, > > kernel 6.1 or 6.2 will change how laptop backlight is handled and it might > negatively affect some laptops, especially older ones. Hans De Goede, the > developer of that change, asks for wider community testing. Here are his blog > pos

Direct to stable updates

Quick question about direct to stable updates in bodhi, such as FF 106.0.4 and kernel 6.0.7 that are lined up for F37 right now. Such updates often end up being in nowhere land for quite some time, because they skip testing to go to stable directly, but the push to stable cannot happen for whatever

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 11/7/22 09:59, Daniel Alley wrote: > The references of the proposal has some discussion on this subject. > Basically, this was already considered and rejected by the kernel > developers including Torvalds directly on the basis that DWARF > unwinding support is simply too complex and nonperforman

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 07:52 +1100, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > Quick question about direct to stable updates in bodhi, such as FF > 106.0.4 and kernel 6.0.7 that are lined up for F37 right now. Such > updates often end up being in nowhere land for quite some time, because > they skip testing t

Re: Direct to stable updates

Maybe push them to both, if they've never been to testing? In other words, never skip testing. Sure, there will be some duplication of packages for a cycle or two, but eventually, they anything that's already in stable will be kicked out of testing, right? -- Bojan __

Non-responsive maintainer check for deji - grads

Non-responsive maintainer check for deji Mainly for grads: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140875 But there is also an old bug for TexMaker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088781 Has anyone else heard from Deji? Is anyone else interested in taking over grads or TexM

Re: Direct to stable updates

Adam Williamson wrote: > Yeah, this is a good point, though I'm not sure how easy it is to fix. if (state == pending && request == stable && !can_push(stable)) push(testing); else push(request); Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@l

Re: SPDX Change update

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 2:04 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Please, start migrating your spec files **now**. You can use the tool > `license-fedora2spdx` from package `license-validate`. Use this opportunity > to check if your package license matches the upstream version - especially if > you took

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji - grads

Hello, I am interesting in maintaining this package(grads) if no one else will, but I require sponsorship since I am still new to this group. On 11/7/22 17:12, Orion Poplawski wrote: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji Mainly for grads: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140875

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for deji - grads

Il 08/11/22 02:12, Orion Poplawski ha scritto: > Non-responsive maintainer check for deji > > Mainly for grads: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140875 > > But there is also an old bug for TexMaker: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088781 > > Has anyone else heard fr

Re: Direct to stable updates

The problem is > !can_push(stable)) > with the current workflow, Bodhi doesn't know when a release is freezed. There is support for a "Freeze" state, but it was never used. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s