OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Old rpm-ostree thread about this:
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1127
1. Debian provides a comparably sized package catalog using one-tenth the size
of Fedora's metadata. Are there any lessons that Fedora can learn from Debian?
2. Does SUSE have the same problem?
___
Upstream has released a beta and plans to release mid-September. This will
be updated in Rawhide and maybe f37.
Affected packages:
blender
luxcorerender
OpenColorIO
openshadinglanguage
usd
All builds will be performed in a side tag.
Thanks,
Richrad
___
Casey Jao via devel writes:
> Old rpm-ostree thread about this:
> https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1127
>
> 1. Debian provides a comparably sized package catalog using one-tenth the
> size of Fedora's metadata. Are there any lessons that Fedora can learn from
> Debian?
> 2. Does SUS
OLD: Fedora-37-20220831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 12
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:6.86 MiB
Size of
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> As I've been working on converting license tags to SPDX, I have found
> myself frequently needing to determine the license for some file that
> is not distributed by the package upstream, such as JavaScript and CSS
> files copied in by documen
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 8:51 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Casey Jao via devel writes:
>
> > Old rpm-ostree thread about this:
> > https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1127
> >
> > 1. Debian provides a comparably sized package catalog using one-tenth the
> > size of Fedora's metadata. Are ther
I'd like to unify fltk but there are a couple of things I'm still unclear
about...
1. If I build the x86_64 package locally via fedpkg or mock, will it build
both the linux and mingw artifacts by default?
2. Since mingw packages are considered "noarch" in infrastructure, I assume
there's some magi
Josef Skladanka wrote:
> [...] document the UI changes you'd like to see, the different icon
> choice you made, and explain why you believe those are more
> "universally understood" or better.
I would not choose different icons, because I believe it's impossible
to draw a universally understood pi
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:04 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Packages that are known to require or build-require slf4j and
> therefore are possibly affected by the update:
>
> antlr3
> antlr4-project
Mock builds of these 2 packages succeeded with SLF4J 2.0.0. They
appear to function normally.
--
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 37 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 8 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F37 Beta for the 13
September early target date[2]. For more information about the
Go/No-Go
meet
On 01.09.22 17:18, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'd like to unify fltk but there are a couple of things I'm still
unclear about...
1. If I build the x86_64 package locally via fedpkg or mock, will it
build both the linux and mingw artifacts by default?
Unless you have any specific %ifarch etc, yes.
2
With loading or not loading file list it is not so easy or in general -
performance optimization is allways a trade one resource for another one or for
some features. DNF5 will provide a setting to not load file list, as well to
not create disk cache, or not using zchunk (already implemented in
On 9/1/22 13:47, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> With loading or not loading file list it is not so easy or in general -
> performance optimization is allways a trade one resource for another one or
> for some features. DNF5 will provide a setting to not load file list, as well
> to not create disk cac
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 4:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 30. 08. 22 20:15, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> 2) One-time enablement of all existing packages
> >>
> >> That should be doable. Right?
> >>
> >>
> >> 3) Automatic enablement of all new packages
> >>
> >> That should be just a matter of cha
Hi Adam
Always on a long weekend. I have an issue with the installation of the
workspace 37beta.
BTW, rawhide is OK for installation (clear images), ditto for reinstallation of
F36live.
Am I the only one getting screen corruption with anaconda and with some parts
of Workspace 37.
I am getti
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:57 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 14:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> To submit more scratch builds we would need larger builder capacity.
>> This doesn't necessarily mean more or bette
On 9/1/22 4:25 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Let me rephrase, is the mingw package going to be built on ALL arches with the
expectation that they are the same (like -data packages)? If so, that seems like a
huge waste of resources.
The MinGW packages would build on all arches. I believe the origina
Hey Fedorans,
We are running a Fedora 37 Pre-Beta Release Validation[0] Test Week!
Come help test the Pre-Beta image and fill up matrixes in here[1].
If you have any questions, reach out to #fedora-test-day on libera or test list!
[0] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/f37-pre-beta-release-v
19 matches
Mail list logo
