slapi-nis license change

Hi, I was intending to do this change for several years but never been able to complete it. With slapi-nis 0.60.0 release today I finally finished relicensing of slapi-nis to GPLv3-or-later and builds in Fedora reflect it now. Previous version was GPLv2. slapi-nis is a plugin to 389-ds LDAP ser

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220820.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220819.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220820.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 129 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 100 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 811.26 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora 37 compose report: 20220820.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20220819.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20220820.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 64 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 910.82 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

[HEADS-UP] Upcoming retirement of gstreamer-rs and wasm-bindgen stacks

Hello fellow Rust packagers, I am progressing with my "spring cleaning" efforts for the Rust stack, and it became apparent that there's a few clusters of packages that are actually unused, but which regularly take up a non-insignificant amount of my package maintenance time. The gstreamer-rs stac

Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0

Am 14.08.22 um 13:08 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: Julian Sikorski wrote on 2022/08/14 19:06: Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of

glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

Hey all, It seems that upstream glibc disabled support for generating DT_HASH tables for its libraries and binaries, which breaks Linux games that use Epic Games' Easy Anti-Cheat (EAC). There's a pretty decent write-up about this on LWN: https://lwn.net/Articles/904892/ Can we turn this back on

Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

I'm inclined to vote -1, if everyone keeps DT_HASH around I doubt Epic will fix the issue. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 09:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Since everyone seems postivie on this, I'll look at switching it on > monday and see what breaks. Does this apply just to package builds, or to everything? i.e. are live image builds also going to use it? It's not necessarily a problem i

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 4:01:39 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to > use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation > was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but ther

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 11:18:14PM -0400, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 09:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Since everyone seems postivie on this, I'll look at switching it on > > monday and see what breaks. > > Does this apply just to package builds, or to everything? i.e.

Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

Neal Gompa wrote: > There's a pretty decent write-up about this on LWN: > https://lwn.net/Articles/904892/ Here's a link that actually works: https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/904892/dba951441b61cbdc/ (Putting the title and "SubscriberLink", both between quotes, into a search engine does wonders.)