No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220717.0):
ID: 1329259 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Good Morning Everyone,
The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
matches an existing bugzilla account.
Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the
Hi Pierre,
Is the subject right? It talks about "michaelanguskelly", but the queries
are for Benjamin (benzea). I can talk to Benjamin if needed (already
pointed him at this thread just in case).
Tom
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 9:59 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The pac
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:44 AM Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> Dan Čermák writes:
>
> > On July 15, 2022 9:42:35 PM UTC, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinux_Parallel_Autorelabel
> >>
> >>This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> >>process, pro
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:12:55AM +0200, Tomáš Popela wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Is the subject right? It talks about "michaelanguskelly", but the queries
> are for Benjamin (benzea). I can talk to Benjamin if needed (already
> pointed him at this thread just in case).
Hi Tomáš,
Thanks for pointin
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220717.0):
ID: 1329275 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89618509
> >
> > On ppc64le:
> > FAIL: test-checkwrite.sh
> >
> > There should be a core dump associated
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 11:07 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> gfbgraph
As gfbgraph is a dep of gnome-maps, I have taken this one.
Regards
Phil
--
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
Associations:
* Debian Maintainer (DM)
* Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
* Contributor member of the AlmaLinu
Hi all,
Today I encountered another LLVM-specific bug that affects at least
one Rust package and causes non-working code to be produced, which
prompted this question:
Why are stable releases not getting bugfix releases of LLVM?
Fedora 35 is stuck at LLVM 13.0.0, while 13.0.1 has been released.
F
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:50 AM Philip Wyett
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 11:07 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > gfbgraph
>
> As gfbgraph is a dep of gnome-maps, I have taken this one.
>
Thanks, Phil!
--
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f
Hi,
Dne 16. 07. 22 v 14:34 Dan Čermák napsal(a):
Hi,
On July 15, 2022 9:30:48 PM UTC, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Web_UI_preview_image
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order t
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89618509
> >
> > On ppc64le:
> > FAIL: test-checkwrite.sh
> >
> > There should be a core dump associated
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 12:54:37 -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> On 22/07/13 05:35PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > This is what we (I) aren't sure of, and that's why I first obtain the
> > capabilities manually and then query for them. If someone can confirm
> > that this is indeed the case, that would certainl
Hi Kevin,
Dne 16. 07. 22 v 21:35 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
...snip...
For this we will create a self-contained boot.iso style image with a
built-in tar-payload (so that the image can work even without network
access) based on the latest Anaconda upstream code.
What packages will be in this tar-pa
On 23. 06. 22 19:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
$ comm -23 <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires
openssl1.1-devel | grep src$ | sort) <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source}
--whatrequires openssl-devel | grep src$ | sort)
...
pypy-0:7.3.9-1.fc37.src
https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/p
On Mon, Jul 18 2022 at 11:07:41 AM +0200, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
gnome-photos (maintained by: gnome-sig, pranvk)
gnome-photos-42.0-3.fc37.src requires pkgconfig(libgfbgraph-0.2) =
0.2.4
gnome-photos-42.0-3.fc37.x86_64 requires gfbgraph(x86-64) =
0.2.4-2.fc36,
gnome-online-miners = 3.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:33:03AM -, Francois Rigault wrote:
> Another idea is to measure the initrd and the boot configuration, for
> example taking a hash of the grub configuration and initrd and
> extending a PCR register.
That is already happening.
Problem with measuring the initrd is th
I've altered the license of conserver in rawhide from 'BSD with
advertising and zlib' to 'BSD and zlib' since the former is no longer
valid.
Lukas
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
Hi,
> Today I encountered another LLVM-specific bug that affects at least
> one Rust package and causes non-working code to be produced, which
> prompted this question:
>
> Why are stable releases not getting bugfix releases of LLVM?
>
> Fedora 35 is stuck at LLVM 13.0.0, while 13.0.1 has been rel
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 3:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Today I encountered another LLVM-specific bug that affects at least
> > one Rust package and causes non-working code to be produced, which
> > prompted this question:
> >
> > Why are stable releases not getting bugfix releases of
indeed, this is why a proposal is to change the way grub measure things.
For example introducing a new PCR, for example PCR10, and a new command,
"extend", that replay a command into the PCR without actually executing it.
This would mean for your above example, if we only limit to the last line,
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-07-13/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-07-13-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-07-13/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-07-13-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-07
Note that this proposal supersedes the Haskell GHC 9.0 & Stackage LTS
19 proposal, which was deferred to F38.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_GHC_8.10.7
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
On 7/18/22 06:33, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 3:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi,
Today I encountered another LLVM-specific bug that affects at least
one Rust package and causes non-working code to be produced, which
prompted this question:
Why are stable releases not getti
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On 7/18/22 06:33, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > I have filed multiple bugs against llvm (or rust, which were then
> > reassigned to llvm) and llvm compat packages over the past 1-2 years,
> > and they've been pretty much ignored.
>
> Can you
On Mo, 18.07.22 14:52, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:33:03AM -, Francois Rigault wrote:
> > Another idea is to measure the initrd and the boot configuration, for
> > example taking a hash of the grub configuration and initrd and
> > extending a PCR regis
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:44 AM Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>
> Dan Čermák writes:
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, how large is the speedup typically?
> >
>
> It depends on the number of threads your machine has. But you could get some
> data for comparison using `fixfiles -T 1 restore` and `fixfiles -
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:50 AM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:44 AM Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> >
> > Dan Čermák writes:
> > >
> > > Just out of curiosity, how large is the speedup typically?
> > >
>
> >
> > It depends on the number of threads your machine has. But you could
Ben Beasley writes:
> I support deprecating openssl1.1. We definitely shouldn’t be adding any
> new packages that depend on it.
>
> However, dropping the -devel package is almost as drastic as simply
> retiring the OpenSSL 1.1 package altogether. Grepping spec files for
> 'BuildRequires:.*openssl1
Hi Tomáš,
Jul 18, 2022 1:42:30 AM Tomas Hrcka :
> Fedora release engineering is running a mass rebuild of rawhide on 20.6., if
> your changes are merged in rawhide/main branches by then, they will be
> included.
Indeed. The distro-wide mass rebuild has been in the back of my mind, but I'm
not
On 18/07/2022 18:18, Richard Shaw wrote:
That worked for now. What's the long term fix?
It will work until the next major release - 10.0.0.
All upstreams need to update to the new API?
Yes.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
_
On 17/07/2022 21:55, zebo...@gmail.com wrote:
Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it.
Can you try this workaround:
%global optflags %(echo %{optflags} -DFMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM)
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
d
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote:
>
> Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet
> upstream, only in Debian yet
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014549
>
Do you have a link to the failed build?
--
Kaleb
_
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Emacs_28
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mumble1.4
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
On 18/07/2022 19:12, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
Do you have a link to the failed build?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89606207
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 7/18/22 12:29 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mumble1.4
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the F
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote:
>
> Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet
> upstream, only in Debian yet
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014549
I opened https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56610
--
Kaleb
___
On 18/07/2022 19:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
Update the Mumble voice chat application from 1.3 to 1.4.
+1. I'm using 1.4.x self-built and it works fine.
This change relocates that file in an RPM scriptlet to align with upstream.
The old path will become a compatibility symlink to the new path.
Pl
Unfortunately, the only machine I have access to with an HDD as the
system drive is running Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, which doesn’t have a
multi-threaded version of fixfiles. So I can’t test this on an HDD-only
system.
Still, here are the timings on a 4-core Atom machine with a SATA SSD and
a large S
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:59:49AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89618509
> > >
> > > On ppc64l
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 01:30:14PM +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Dne 16. 07. 22 v 21:35 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > ...snip...
> > > For this we will create a self-contained boot.iso style image with a
> > > built-in tar-payload (so that the image can work even without network
> > > ac
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220717.0):
ID: 1329641 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1329641
ID: 1329645 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:47 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote:
>
> >
> > Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet
> > upstream, only in Debian yet
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014549
>
>
> I opened https
On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 13:02 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> We tested this extensively in FreeIPA upstream CI using a separate COPR
> repo. Current FreeIPA versions in Fedora are ready and rawhide version of
> bind-dyndb-ldap only needs a rebuild.
>
> I'm currently on a sick leave but Peter shou
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 12:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:47 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet
> > > upstream, only in Debian yet
> > > https://
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:39:58 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:59:49AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://koji.fedo
On 18/07/2022 21:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
We could temporarily drop Boxes from Workstation, I guess, especially
since it doesn't work right now due to libsoup hilarity[0]. But we
should really have a proper fix ASAP.
Fixed: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ceph/pull-request/5
--
Sincerely,
Hello,
The packages have been updated in Fedora Rawhide.
A big thank you to everyone who helped mitigate the impact of this update.
You can now test your packages using Koji scratch build as you're used to.
$ koji build --scratch rawhide
There are still some packages with open Bugzilla tickets.
Dear Bhavin,
A big "yay!" for packaging 28.1; I've been running my own emacs.spec modifications to play
around with this, for one reason, and one reason alone:
PGTK support. Without it, emacs is virtually unusable on Wayland on hidpi screens with the
compositors I've used, as xwayland simply
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 09:28:42PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:39:58 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:59:49AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:3
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 22:15 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/07/2022 21:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We could temporarily drop Boxes from Workstation, I guess, especially
> > since it doesn't work right now due to libsoup hilarity[0]. But we
> > should really have a proper fix ASAP.
On 18/07/2022 23:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
Looks like it's failing on some warnings as it's being built with -
Wall...
Another issue:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ceph-17.2.1/src/mon/LogMonitor.cc:418:21: error:
no matching function for call to 'format_to(fmt::v9::memory_buffer&,
const char [4], c
On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 16:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Some time ago I proposed some specific networking release criteria. I
> revived the thread back in February, and meeting discussion suggested
> we should be more intentional and specific about wifi requirements. So,
> lookin
On 10. 07. 22 19:43, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Hello.
fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both API
and ABI changes.
Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0
The list of affected packages in Rawhide:
0ad
OpenImageIO
cantera
ceph
dolphi
On 19. 07. 22 1:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
dolphin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108353
Sorry, dolphin-emu.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
57 matches
Mail list logo
