Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 05:16:55PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 09.07.22 um 15:36 schrieb Stephen Smoogen: > > > > > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Appa

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:36:14AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was wrong. > > > > > > No, I believe the service which is behind these emails is called FMN. It i

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220711.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220710.0): ID: 1320905 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

> I am not excited, because I feel it doesn't add any value to Fedora. It's not about adding "value", it's about making sure that people realize that they are running unsupported software which no longer receives updates and might have vulnerabilities, including remote. Actually, any now unsuppor

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

> If we can get SHSTK to work, the value of the DWARF integration and > performance work will diminish fairly quickly because most developers > will soon have CPUs with fairly deep (32 entry) LBR buffers, SHSTK > support, or both. This seems like a fairly bold assumption. I also want to add that a

Re: Request: Airspy HF+

I went ahead and built it after battling for a month on exactly how to do it with Fedora in this world of online instructions being mostly for Ubuntu: https://groups.io/g/airspy/message/43783 AirSpy HF library version: 1.6.8 ___ devel mailing list -- d

Re: Rename Airspy

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105847 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-c

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220711.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220710.0): ID: 1320921 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Daan De Meyer via devel: >> If we can get SHSTK to work, the value of the DWARF integration and >> performance work will diminish fairly quickly because most developers >> will soon have CPUs with fairly deep (32 entry) LBR buffers, SHSTK >> support, or both. > > This seems like a fairly bold as

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

> You still might have LBR buffers deep enough for your purposes, I think > that's worth checking. They have been around for much longer (on > Intel). We've been using LBR opportunistically for a while if available to augment frame pointer based stacks. It turns out to be quite helpful at the l

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

Last time I checked we were stuck on pagure not emitting any messages on staging. I will look into this more this week. I will try to test on tickets that are on https://stg.pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests and if they will be processed without issue, I plan to deploy it on production. The

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 09:35 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:36:14AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I > > > was wrong. > >

Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a): > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS, > which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about > module lifecycles? What is it about

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 06:22, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 09:35 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:36:14AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I thought the not

Re: About Fedora containers

Hi Alejandro, we have developed an easy GitHub Action [1]. The example how to use it is already mentioned in README.md [2]. All our images are automatically by merging PR pushed into Quay.io. See an examples GitHub Action here [3]. As you can see the nginx-container image is automatically pushed

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220711.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220710.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220711.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 61 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.44 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

Do we have any notification alternative interface other than IRC? What about pushing notifications to matrix, XMPP or other protocol/service? I think IRC has often also not-so-short delays. Is there something we can to to improve the situation? On 09. 07. 22 15:24, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Hi,

Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:02 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a): > > > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS, > > which have their own somewhat different relea

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 09:36, Petr Menšík wrote: > Do we have any notification alternative interface other than IRC? What > about pushing notifications to matrix, XMPP or other protocol/service? > > I think IRC has often also not-so-short delays. Is there something we > can to to improve the situ

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > Do we have any notification alternative interface other than IRC? What about > pushing notifications to matrix, XMPP or other protocol/service? There were other channels like email, but they do not work, too. I seem to recevive last

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 17:16 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: > ** Ensure any patches required are accepted upstream > ** Work with kernel, mesa and other maintainers to ensure everything > is as it should be > ** Test Also, 'add it to the list of officially-supported pla

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

I don’t believe this list is nearly complete. Two packages I maintain that would be affected (fmidi and giada) are absent from the list. Using the following command:     mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --dnf-cmd -- repoquery --whatrequires 'libfmt.so.8*' I found these additional dependent pack

Fedora-Rawhide-20220711.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 13/236 (x86_64), 14/165 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: F37 proposal: Stratis 3.1.0 (Self-Contained change)

Note that the owners have submitted an updated proposal for Stratis 3.2.0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stratis_3.2.0 Since this is a leaf package and the differences between 3.1 and 3.2 do not seem significant to our process, I will restart the clock on the FESCo vote for the updated pr

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Two of the three packages I tried to rebuild (bear and fmidi) failed with errors like: /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization:https://fmt.dev/latest/api.html#udt 1733 | form

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

> My comment was specifically about sysprof. I've been told that the > GNOME developers will not even consider anything else. This means that > we need to fix sysprof. If we do that, it will be possible to use GNOME > OS for profiling on older CPUs, and hardware-assisted backtraces on > newer CP

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

On 05. 07. 22 13:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, forwarding this  message to Fedora. Will know more by the end of this week -- we might need to consider reverting back to Python 3.10 if we don't want to ship Fedora 37 GA with a beta version of Python :( The fourth beta is out. "As the requir

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On 7/11/22 10:05, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 09:36, Petr Menšík wrote: > >> Do we have any notification alternative interface other than IRC? What >> about pushing notifications to matrix, XMPP or other protocol/service? >> >> I think IRC has often also not-so-short delays. I

rpmbuild is very slow with large files

Hi, I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a ~2.5 GB rpm and found, that rpmbuild is an extrem bottleneck. IMHO, this is caused by a fileread function which reads files in 32k blocks, which is very slow and extrem IO intensive.  The result is a task running at 1 cor

Python package review

Hi, I'm looking for help review the following python packages needed by python-jsonschema+format python-rfc3339-validator: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106174 python-rfc3986-validator: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106171 and let me know if you need some

Re: Python package review

On 22/07/12 12:28AM, chedi toueiti wrote: > I'm looking for help review the following python packages needed by > python-jsonschema+format > > > python-rfc3339-validator: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106174 @music already packaged this (I was the reviewer), but it seems he has

Re: Python package review

On 22/07/12 12:28AM, chedi toueiti wrote: > I'm looking for help review the following python packages needed by > python-jsonschema+format > > > python-rfc3339-validator: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106174 @music already packaged this (I was the reviewer), but it seems he has

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Unfortunately, no, there's no in-kernel DWARF unwinder due to the complexity > involved. > Instead, the kernel uses ORC and has an unwinder for that. Adding ORC support > to all of > Linux userspace so that we can unwind it in the kernel isn't likely to > happen, since > all tooling would have

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 7/11/22 09:50, Ben Beasley wrote: Two of the three packages I tried to rebuild (bear and fmidi) failed with errors like: /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization:https://fmt.dev/

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hello, > Setting up a copr repo to find all other breakages sounds like a good idea. I'm actually working on a tool to help with such use cases. It may be a bit early since I only made an internal alpha release, and only planned to go public by the end of this month with it, but since that may he