Fedora-Cloud-36-20220709.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220708.0): ID: 1319828 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: [Rust] Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (July 2022 Edition)

On Sat, Jul 9, 2022, at 01:35, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 07. 22 0:26, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > In addition, I would ask of all of you to make sure all your packages have > > been > > added to the @rust-sig group on src.fedoraproject.org (at least with > > "commit" > > access), unless there i

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220709.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220708.0): ID: 1319844 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

CPE Weekly Update – Week 27 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). Week: 4th - 7th July 2022 If you wish to read this in for

Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

Hi, I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was wrong. I just received this: Subject: corsepiu pushed 1 commit to rpms/perl-Sub-HandlesVia (rawhide) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 10:39:46 + (GMT) From: notificati...@fedoraproject.org ... Notification time stamped 2022-07-0

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > Hi, > > I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was wrong. > > No, I believe the service which is behind these emails is called FMN. It is very fragile for multiple reasons where it falls over for different reasons all t

Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (July 2022 Edition)

On Sat, 2022-07-09 at 00:26 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > - dcavalca (2): rust-esphome, rust-rustcat Fixed, thanks for the reminder. Cheers Davide ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list

Re: Orphaning some packages

On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 17:38 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: > stress-ng I'll be happy taking over stress-ng. Regards, Dominic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fed

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

Am 09.07.22 um 15:36 schrieb Stephen Smoogen: On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius > wrote: Hi, I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was wrong. No, I believe the service which is behind these emails is called FMN.

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 11:18, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 09.07.22 um 15:36 schrieb Stephen Smoogen: > > > > > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was > >

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Why does the unwinding need to happen in the kernel? The kernel can > already asynchronously invoke userspace code in the form of signal > handlers. Is the problem that it is necessary to collect profiling > information in the middle of a system call, where another syscall > would see inconsist

Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (July 2022 Edition)

On Sat, 2022-07-09 at 00:26 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > If you want a scripted way of adding "@rust-sig" group to many > packages, you > can generate an API token on src.fedoraproject.org (with "Modify an > existing > project") access level, and use the simple Python script from this > GitHub g

Fedora-Rawhide-20220709.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 12/236 (x86_64), 12/165 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220708.n.0): ID: 1319946 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_no

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > That said, until then I can try and run things on weekends. > > Is there a formal process to volunteer to hold the keys to the kingdom? Yes. Basically o

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On 6/21/22 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 6/21/22 13:10, Matthew Miller wrote: Phoronix credits this to those distros shipping with P-state Performance by default. Yes, but I doubt that for several reasons: First, it's a claim without evidence.  That setting isn't the only difference between

MUMPS 5.5.0

Hi all. Next release of MUMPS is the 5.5.0, it will be built in Rawhide within 7 days together with related dependencies. Changelog: http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/index.php?page=dwnld Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE