Hi
I'll update to tesseract-5.2.0 in rawhide, and rebuild affected packages
as listed below. I'll do the work in the side tag f37-build-side-54886.
Thanks
Sandro
---
Affected packages:
ffmpeg
gimagereader
mupdf
opencv
python-PyMuPDF
R-tesseract
zathura-pdf-mupdf
__
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220707.0):
ID: 1318917 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 7/6/22 08:30, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 05/07/2022 21:15, Matthias Clasen wrote:
And I doubt that you'd be able to notice a 'smaller than 1% slowdown'
on your system.
4% slowdown is unacceptable.
At least for Fedora Workstation, being
a useful system for developers with working d
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220707.0):
ID: 1318933 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi,
After a few issues with the new zlib-1.2.12 release [1], we fixed the
incompatible issue spotted in ruby package [2].
I would like to announce the new zlib-1.2.12-3 package that is now present
in Fedora Rawhide [3].
This release also brings some new IBM performance optimizations which are
me
Christian Hergert wrote:
> For those not familiar with Sysprof, or profiling the desktop at large,
> generally a single program is not the problem. The performance problems
> often exist across a number of processes.
[…]
> The most used collector, however, is the perf collector which is just
> read
PS: One more question:
Christian Hergert wrote:
> We have an in-tree parser for ELF that allows us to avoid a lot of
> extraneous code when extracting symbols. Partially because libunwind is
> incredibly slow (by profiler requirements), and partially because
> historically we never had to stash st
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 08:13:52PM -, Christian Hergert wrote:
> Sysprof has modular data collection backends, and not everything
> requires linking against libunwind.
>
> For those not familiar with Sysprof, or profiling the desktop at
> large, generally a single program is not the problem. T
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220707.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220708.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 123
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 21.28 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> gdb and similar tools are confused, notably because local variables are
> "optimsed out" (which I suspect is related to frame pointer).
It is not.
This is related to compiling with any optimization at all, and you
definitely do not want production binaries compiled
On Thursday, 7 July 2022 19:37:16 BST Sharpened Blade via devel wrote:
> If it is really compromised, then you have to assume anything the vm sends
> you is fake. As far as the owner of guest knows, there could not even a a
> real vm, only a ssh shell that looks like it.
> In a real situation, th
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> That said, until then I can try and run things on weekends.
Is there a formal process to volunteer to hold the keys to the kingdom?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
Luna Jernberg wrote:
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Systemd-Creator-Microsoft
> https://linuxactionnews.com/248
Time to remove systemd from the distribution?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:05 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Systemd-Creator-Microsoft
> > https://linuxactionnews.com/248
>
> Time to remove systemd from the distribution?
Why? There's other maintainers, and he's no
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said:
> Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Systemd-Creator-Microsoft
> > https://linuxactionnews.com/248
>
> Time to remove systemd from the distribution?
What part of Free and Open says "judge people based on their employe
On 08.07.22 09:46, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll update to tesseract-5.2.0 in rawhide, and rebuild affected
packages as listed below. I'll do the work in the side tag
f37-build-side-54886.
Done now, all build succeeded.
Sandro
___
devel mailing li
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:34 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said:
> > Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Systemd-Creator-Microsoft
> > > https://linuxactionnews.com/248
> >
> > Time to remove systemd from the distribution?
>
> W
Hey folks,
The deadline for the Nest with Fedora CfP submissions is extended until
next Wednesday, July 13th! Make sure to submit your ideas on the Flock
Pagure repo: https://pagure.io/flock/issues
Registration is also open: https://hopin.com/events/nest-with-fedora-2022
Cheers!
--
Marie
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Why? There's other maintainers, and he's not been the lead maintainer
> in Fedora for some time.
But upstream is now under a hostile corporation's control? Can we trust the
most privileged userspace program when it is effectively controlled by a
hostile corporation?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:09 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Why? There's other maintainers, and he's not been the lead maintainer
> > in Fedora for some time.
>
> But upstream is now under a hostile corporation's control? Can we trust the
> most privileged userspace
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Microsoft has people working on a number of core Linux projects ever
> since they started making their own Linux distribution.
It is fun how the old
https://web.archive.org/web/20220312030903/http://www.mslinux.org/
joke has suddenly become reality.
I hope we are not getting E
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 04:08:55PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> But upstream is now under a hostile corporation's control? Can we trust the
> most privileged userspace program when it is effectively controlled by a
> hostile corporation?
Let's please not do this. Upstream is an LGPL pr
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 04:08:55PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Why? There's other maintainers, and he's not been the lead maintainer
> > in Fedora for some time.
>
> But upstream is now under a hostile corporation's control? Can we trust the
> most privileged
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
But upstream is now under a hostile corporation's control? Can we trust the
most privileged userspace program when it is effectively controlled by a
hostile corporation?
Yes we can, by reading and evaluating the code like we always do. If it
st
On 7/7/22 16:13, Christian Hergert wrote:
> Sysprof has modular data collection backends, and not everything requires
> linking against libunwind.
>
> For those not familiar with Sysprof, or profiling the desktop at large,
> generally a single program is not the problem. The performance problems
On 08/07/2022 16:14, Matthew Miller wrote:
And Microsoft is not the 1990s Microsoft. They know that
they need to do this differently and I know there are people (actual, real,
humans!) who care about open source and making Linux better for everyone.
And now that includes Lennart.
No. Microsoft
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 17:20 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 08/07/2022 16:14, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > And Microsoft is not the 1990s Microsoft. They know that
> > they need to do this differently and I know there are people (actual, real,
> > humans!) who care about open source and ma
On 08/07/2022 17:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
That's not what that story says. It says you can't charge for them.
Additionally, Microsoft says[1] the intent is not to stop F/OSS
developers from charging for their own software, but to stop others
passing off for a profit. I agree that the current p
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> For example, last week they decided to kill all OSS applications from
> the Microsoft Store:
>
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/vtxr9r/software_freedom_conservancy_heads_up_microsoft/
Actually, what they did there actually makes sense to me. The rule prohi
Hello,
I've been doing a terrible job of maintaining these recently. Please let me
know if you would like to take over. Will orphan otherwise.
python-tenacity
python-typeguard
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf
rubygem-chunky_png
rubygem-css_parser
rubygem-font-awesome-rails
rubygem-pdf-core
rubygem-prawn-i
Discussion of Microsoft Store policies is off-topic for this list. The
Water Cooler category[1] on Fedora Discussion would be a good place to
have this conversation.
[1] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/fun/8
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/In
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 10/236 (x86_64), 16/165 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220707.n.0):
ID: 1319040 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_pr
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:05 PM Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 07/07/2022 17:36, Onuralp SEZER wrote:
> >
> > For example can you run wayland, or usage of fully supported GPU usage,
> > Rs-pi's Camera usage, SPI , I2C , GPIO usages (PWM,Analog and others)
>
>
> Indeed. Also, the installation pro
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 6:39 PM Christopher Brown wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been doing a terrible job of maintaining these recently. Please let me
> know if you would like to take over. Will orphan otherwise.
>
> python-tenacity
> python-typeguard
> rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf
> rubygem-chunky_png
>
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:23 PM Sally A. Haj via devel
wrote:
>
> Fist of all, thank you for the big amazing news for Fedora.
> I have some questions about the new support of V3D in Fedora, is that support
> goes to upstream mainline Linux kernel? If yes, which release of Kernel has
> that inclu
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:37 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> I have a Pi 4 that runs Fedora just fine; I use it to build Swift (takes
> almost 24 hours, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) so what doesn’t work? What podcast was this
> mentioned on?
Core things have worked for some time, I know, I did the work, but
we've not
Hey Christopher,
I can take over:
python-tenacity
python-typeguard
From you, my FAS account name is: supakeen
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022, at 6:38 PM, Christopher Brown wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been doing a terrible job of maintaining these recently. Please
> let me know if you would
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 7:49 AM Peter Boy wrote:>
> I very much appreciate the work to support the various SBC devices like
> Raspberry Pi and workalikes. But I'm a little lost with this proposal.
>
> > Am 05.07.2022 um 23:16 schrieb Ben Cotton :
> > The work around Raspberry Pi 4 has been on goin
I don’t think we should be gatekeeping who can propose or discuss a
Change. I do think that the opinions of the upstream and downstream GCC
maintainers should be weighed quite heavily when considering a change to
the default compiler flags.
As a FESCo member, I’m waiting to see if the Change o
I like this proposal. Is the intent to use the raw.xz image or the "iso +
UEFI" mechanism?
Steve
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
It's been a while since we've had some Prioritized Bugs that are
stuck, but here we are. If you can help move these forward, you are a
hero.
1. cmake — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079833 — NEW
Get rid of multiple source path definitions
Versions of cmake prior to 3.23 accidentall
> So it looks like what you folks are doing is actually very similar to what
> Facebook is doing. That is interesting, and explains why some GNOME
> developers are jumping on the bandwagon of this Change proposal.
To be fair, we've been complaining about it internally in GNOME for probably
arou
> Frank Ch. Eigler mentions that elfutils has a more modern unwinding library.
> Could that perhaps solve your performance issues with libunwind?
I don't think so. The problem is two-fold.
First, we have to capture enough of the stack to do offline unwinding. I think
the default many people do
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Christian Hergert wrote:
>
> > So it looks like what you folks are doing is actually very similar to what
> > Facebook is doing. That is interesting, and explains why some GNOME
> > developers are jumping on the bandwagon of this Change proposal.
>
> To be fair, we'v
On 7/8/22 15:29, Christian Hergert wrote:
>> Frank Ch. Eigler mentions that elfutils has a more modern unwinding library.
>> Could that perhaps solve your performance issues with libunwind?
>
> I don't think so. The problem is two-fold.
>
> First, we have to capture enough of the stack to do off
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 17:59 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 08/07/2022 17:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That's not what that story says. It says you can't charge for them.
> >
> > Additionally, Microsoft says[1] the intent is not to stop F/OSS
> > developers from charging for their ow
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 12:40 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Discussion of Microsoft Store policies is off-topic for this list. The
> Water Cooler category[1] on Fedora Discussion would be a good place to
> have this conversation.
Sorry, I sent my last reply before seeing this one.
--
Adam Williamson
F
Hello Rust packagers,
Following up on my previous emails, there are still a lot of Rust packages that
were imported to Fedora, but the recommended "initial setup" for them was never
finished.
I have started by adding them all "rust-*" packages to koschei, which makes it
way easier for me to see a
On 09. 07. 22 0:26, Fabio Valentini wrote:
In addition, I would ask of all of you to make sure all your packages have been
added to the @rust-sig group on src.fedoraproject.org (at least with "commit"
access), unless there is a very good reason not to do so (and if that is the
case for a particul
> That is the problem right here: .eh_frame-based unwinding is too slow, so it
> has to be
> done offline in userspace. What about instead adding ORC information to
> userspace? That
> would be much faster to use.
I'm not familiar with ORC, but there are a few things that initially come to
min
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 23:21:36 +0200
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 07. 22 23:16, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > The work around Raspberry Pi 4 has been on going for a number of
> > years, but we've never officially supported it due to lack of
> > accelerated graphics and other key features. A few of us have l
On 7/8/22 20:18, Christian Hergert wrote:
>> That is the problem right here: .eh_frame-based unwinding is too slow, so it
>> has to be
>> done offline in userspace. What about instead adding ORC information to
>> userspace? That
>> would be much faster to use.
>
> I'm not familiar with ORC, bu
The truth package has been failing to build for quite a while, and I
can't figure out how to fix it. I believe it's related to versions of
the auto package. I dealt with those quite a while ago, but really
don't have the time to delve back into it again.
Any help would greatly appreciated.
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, 03:37 Allan via devel,
wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 23:21:36 +0200
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 05. 07. 22 23:16, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > The work around Raspberry Pi 4 has been on going for a number of
> > > years, but we've never officially supported it due to lack of
> >
54 matches
Mail list logo
