No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220604.0):
ID: 1289020 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 6/3/22 13:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
BTW isn't the `_flag_` prefix too generic? And also, the initial
underscore implies that this is internal macro which should ideally not
be used. So should it be rather removed or not?
I agree that the
On Sunday, 05 June 2022 at 10:36, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/06/2022 22:43, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > > But the question is, what needs to be done so that ffmpeg-free will not
> > > suffer, either.
> >
> > ffmpeg-free is a sp
Hey All,
First of all, I would like to thank all those who have shown interest
in testing Fedora and making it better.
We saw a lot of new faces in the test day(s) and introduction emails
to welcome you all,
here's is what we have for you.
We are going to have an onboarding call,
We will focus on
On 6/5/22 15:08, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4 2022 at 01:05:58 AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen
wrote:
It seems clear that there is a bug somewhere, but I cannot decide,
where, hence this post to devel. Should Fedora's Firefox actually have
media.ffmpeg.enabled set to false by default, becau
On Sunday, 05 June 2022 at 19:15, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > P.S. Vitaly, your suggestions to enable rpmfusion are not helpful for
> > inexperienced Fedora users, who expect multimedia to work
> > out-of-the-box. Common multimedia needs like "play a video" absolute
On Saturday, 04 June 2022 at 00:05, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> I have discovered that installing the ffmpeg-free package degrades Firefox
> video support. Without any kind of ffmpeg installed, Firefox is able to play
> all the videos I want to watch. Installing RPM Fusion's ffmpeg package does
> not
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 6th
June(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproject.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220604.0):
ID: 1289036 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Before I open a bug on this, the latest firefox/nss software that is in F36 -
is it not accepting SSL certificates without matching subjectAlternativeName on
purpose?
I still have to complete more tests, but it seems that if SSL certificate is
issued to CN abc.example.com and if that name is no
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> $ gcc -m32 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 main.c
> $ ./a.out
> sizeof(time_t)=8
>
> I recommend you to file a bug against tar in Fedora's Bugzilla. However, this
> proposed solution would require rebuilding in the same way all l
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:03 PM Bojan Smojver via devel
wrote:
>
> Before I open a bug on this, the latest firefox/nss software that is in F36 -
> is it not accepting SSL certificates without matching subjectAlternativeName
> on purpose?
>
> I still have to complete more tests, but it seems that
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 05:17, Ian Laurie wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing crashes and other strange events in VirtualBox
> 6.1.34 (from RPMFusion) with Linux guests when the Linux host is running
> Fedora 36 with kernel-5.17.12?
>
I do and on two different machines (one a Lubuntu guest and the oth
V Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:07:18PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar napsal(a):
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > $ gcc -m32 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 main.c
> > $ ./a.out
> > sizeof(time_t)=8
> >
> > I recommend you to file a bug against tar in Fedora's Bugzilla.
On Monday, 06 June 2022 at 12:03, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> Before I open a bug on this, the latest firefox/nss software that is
> in F36 - is it not accepting SSL certificates without matching
> subjectAlternativeName on purpose?
>
> I still have to complete more tests, but it seems that i
On 6/6/22 13:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:07:18PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar napsal(a):
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
$ gcc -m32 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 main.c
$ ./a.out
sizeof(time_t)=8
I recommend you to file a bug against tar in F
Hello all,
Fedora 34 will go end of life for updates and support on 2022-06-07
No further updates, including security updates, will be
available for Fedora 34 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora
34 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well.
Fedora 35 will continue to receive updat
Ah, cool. Totally missed that in release notes. 🤦♂️
Thanks,
--
Bojan
6 June 2022 8:13:10 pm Alexander Sosedkin :
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:03 PM Bojan Smojver via devel
wrote:
>
> Before I open a bug on this, the latest firefox/nss software that is i
V Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 02:40:50PM +0300, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
> On 6/6/22 13:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:07:18PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar napsal(a):
> > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > $ gcc -m32 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=
> That is also blatantly false. The idea was posted by Andreas on
> rpmfusion-developers list in November 2021 and I (one of the FFmpeg
> maintainers) was the only one who responded. The other maintainers made
> no comments in that thread.
>
> In other words, Kevin, please stop spreading lies.
>
Hi all.
I know we're all busy people, but I'm hoping I can impose on someone with the
necessary rights to take a look at this, as it's been in limbo for several
months now.
Basically, I discovered a fairly nasty bug in chrpath — a package for which
upstream has vanished, so we're pretty much o
Dne 03. 06. 22 v 16:32 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 6/3/22 02:24, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are looking into this and I like this proposal, have you
considered to look alto into `%extension_*flags`:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/rawhide/f/macros#_120-123
Am 06.06.22 um 16:38 schrieb Petr Pisar:
I believe that glibc payed a special attention to provide both ABIs. But that
does not apply to other libraries. Maybe it's not so important problem.
Proprietary software tends to bundle the libraries, externally relying only on
kernel and glibc.
How ab
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:40 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
>
> > That is also blatantly false. The idea was posted by Andreas on
> > rpmfusion-developers list in November 2021 and I (one of the FFmpeg
> > maintainers) was the only one who responded. The other maintainers made
> > no comments in that thre
* Ralf Corsépius:
> Am 06.06.22 um 16:38 schrieb Petr Pisar:
>
>> I believe that glibc payed a special attention to provide both
>> ABIs. But that does not apply to other libraries. Maybe it's not so
>> important problem. Proprietary software tends to bundle the
>> libraries, externally relying o
we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
On F35 (and earlier) no issues at all.
On F36 (installed end of last week) some programs are not recognized and
issue error message "not a dynamic executable" when examined with "ldd":
any ideas?
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 14:07, Roger Wells wrote:
> we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
> Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
> On F35 (and earlier) no issues at all.
> On F36 (installed end of last week) some programs are not recognized and
> issue error message "not a
Hi,
what is pvcs ?
On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 14:05 -0400, Roger Wells wrote:
> we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
> Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
> On F35 (and earlier) no issues at all.
> On F36 (installed end of last week) some programs are not recognized
> a
* Roger Wells:
> we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
> Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
> On F35 (and earlier) no issues at all.
> On F36 (installed end of last week) some programs are not recognized
> and issue error message "not a dynamic executable" when examined
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 15:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is pvcs ?
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PVCS
>
>
> On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 14:05 -0400, Roger Wells wrote:
> > we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
> > Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
> > On F35 (a
On 6/6/22 14:28, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 14:07, Roger Wells
wrote:
we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
On F35 (and earlier) no issues at all.
On F36 (installed end of last week) some progr
On 6/6/22 15:13, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
what is pvcs ?
an ancient commercial source code configuration management tool, first
released 37 years ago
On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 14:05 -0400, Roger Wells wrote:
we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
Currently we are using it on RHE
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 15:50, Roger Wells wrote:
>
> On 6/6/22 14:28, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 14:07, Roger Wells
> wrote:
>
>> we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
>> Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
>> On F35 (and earlier) no issues at
Hi,
On 6/6/22 21:14, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Roger Wells:
>
>> we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
>> Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
>> On F35 (and earlier) no issues at all.
>> On F36 (installed end of last week) some programs are not recognized
>> and issue e
On 6/6/22 15:14, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Roger Wells:
we use pvcs here for CM and have for many years (~30).
Currently we are using it on RHEL 7 & Fedora.
On F35 (and earlier) no issues at all.
On F36 (installed end of last week) some programs are not recognized
and issue error message "not a
On 6/6/22 00:58, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 6/3/22 13:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
BTW isn't the `_flag_` prefix too generic? And also, the initial
underscore implies that this is internal macro which should ideally not
be used. So should it be
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Sunday, 05 June 2022 at 19:15, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> It is common knowledge that Fedora is/was effectively useless for
>> anything remotely related to multimedia without RPM Fusion packages.
>
> That's entirely false. There are many multimedia
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Could it be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089986 ?
>
> There's an update fixing it, so please test:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e3c5f45422
That bug is a direct result of the downstream-only hack to dlopen
libopenh26
On Mon, Jun 6 2022 at 11:58:45 PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
for no practical benefit whatsoever because
everyone can just install the codecs from RPM Fusion.
Kevin, I care about users who do not know about rpmfusion, or have
enough technical experience to enable it. Everything you'
On 6/6/22 20:25, Paul Black via devel wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 05:17, Ian Laurie wrote:
Is anyone else seeing crashes and other strange events in VirtualBox
6.1.34 (from RPMFusion) with Linux guests when the Linux host is
running
Fedora 36 with kernel-5.17.12?
I do and o
40 matches
Mail list logo
