Fedora-Cloud-36-20220529.0 compose check report

2022-05-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220528.0): ID: 1282911 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-05-29 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 29/05/2022 02:57, Gerald Henriksen wrote: There is no indication that the JDK is such a thing - in fact given the packagers are struggling that is a good indication that the JDK is being regularly updated. Every 3 months in a patch release. I don't think maintainers will manually backport p

Fedora-IoT-36-20220529.0 compose check report

2022-05-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220523.0): ID: 1282931 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282931 ID: 1282938 Test: x86_64 IoT-

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220529.0 compose check report

2022-05-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220528.0): ID: 1282957 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220529.n.0 changes

2022-05-29 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220529.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 32 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-05-29 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 14.05.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GPTforBIOSbyDefault > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be im

Fedora-Rawhide-20220529.n.0 compose check report

2022-05-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0): ID: 1283030 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso an

Cannot report selinux bug...

2022-05-29 Thread Barry Scott
I was told to report an selinux bug. I clicked the report bug button and was asked for my API key. Then I created the API key and plugged that in and hit OK. Now I am being asked to unlock a keyring (?) with the name "default". It is not locked with my password. I'm on KDE. Is this "default" a g

Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-05-29 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 6:56 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 14.05.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GPTforBIOSbyDefault > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly announced in orde