No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220512.0):
ID: 1266220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
Week: 09th May - 13th May 2022
If you wish to read this i
Hello everybody,
it's been almost a year that rpmautospec was released in production on
Koji builders and its about time for an update. Last week I released
version 0.2.6 as a Fedora package and deployed it to Koji in staging
infra for testing meanwhile.
So, if you use rpmautospec in your package
Sorry what I meant was that I took a fresh installation of F35 and
converted it to Rawhide.
On 12 May 2022, at 14:45, Dux Amour wrote:
Rawhide is rolling so im confused what you mean by 35? Rawhide is
going
towards 37 Beta...
Also for Rawhide i get all the configs in git and just do nightly
It works for me and really like this new approach. Switched couple of my
packages and no issue so far with rpmautospec itself. But some 3rd-party tools
requires some work and adaption. For example if you already switched to
rpmautospec format and try to:
$ fedpkg import foo.fc36.src.rpm
then
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
ID: 1266909 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1266909
ID: 1266911 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignitio
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 22/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220512.n.0):
ID: 1266367 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso de
On Fri, May 13, 2022, at 06:18, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> * Relevant for local use (i.e. doesn't need deployment into production,
> only the 0.2.6 version installed locally)
>
>* Add rpmautospec convert command which converts a package repository
>to using %autorelease and %autochangelog (th
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Com
I have some jobs queued up on copr, and while the x86_64 builders are working fine, the ppc64le
builders appear to be down. "State" has remained "pending" for about an hour,
so far.
Is this a planned outage?
Steve
___
devel mailing list -- d
+1
My main machine still uses bios boot.
Steve
On 5/13/22 10:27 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community
Changing the default in Python was discussed multiple times over the
last 20 years. Every time, it was said that it's convenient and it's
not worth it to break use cases to increase the default security.
Python 3.4 already has -I (isolated mode) which imply Python 3.11 -P
option, but it also impli
Does rpmautospec compatible with EPEL-9, EPEL-8 branches?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/cod
Ben Cotton writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
> by the
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 1:21 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly announced i
So I went to do a dnf system-upgrade from F35 to F36 on a test machine,
as part of my usual testing. In the middle of the process, it appears
that /var filled up and that left the system in an unfortunate state.
Surprisingly (to me) it did boot with a random mix of F35 and F36
packages and even th
I had issues with this for several releases now, although I never got a
broken upgrade like you're reporting: every time so far I got a message
'you need additional 4GB on /' before the actual upgrade started. It
would be sad if the free space estimation code didn't work and allowed
broken, hal
On Friday, May 13, 2022 10:45:55 AM CDT Artem Tim wrote:
> Does rpmautospec compatible with EPEL-9, EPEL-8 branches?
Not currently. There has been an effort[0] to get it branched for epel9, but it
has stalled. I submitted a PR[1] to make it work, but it has not yet been
reviewed.
[0]: https://b
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:21:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly ann
Thanks, Ewoud!
I'm happy to return the favour, but it might take me a few days to find the
time. This will be my first time reviewing a Fedora packaging request, so I
feel I ought to do some more in-depth reading in preparation.
Best,
Christoph
On Thursday, 12 May 2022 11:20:11 CEST Ewoud Kohl
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 14:02 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:21:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
> > >
> > > This document represents a proposed Chan
22 matches
Mail list logo
