Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

Hello all, You might have heard some rumours that the Packit team is working on automation for downstream activities you need to do when working on a new release of a package to Fedora. And the rumours are true – I am really pleased to announce that Packit now covers the whole workflow from upstre

Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience

Dne 05. 05. 22 v 19:35 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:50 PM Marián Konček wrote: Adding onto this, as I mentioned an additional step, I can also imagine defining some macros which would be used in the .spec file. We could have a simple generic one that would be available

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220506.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220505.0): ID: 1257491 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience

I agree with Vit, I want to add to this: * still having to maintain a custom script is not an improvement over our current situation. * make sure that $VERSION can be processed, there are cases when for example the tilde "~" needs to be swapped for dash "-". * More complex case of $VERSION: obt

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220505.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 90 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 372.80 KiB Size of dropped packages

CPE Weekly Update – Week 18 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). Week: 2nd - 6th May 2022 If you wish to read this in form of a

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: Hello all, You might have heard some rumours that the Packit team is working on automation for downstream activities you need to do when working on a new release of a package to Fedora. And the rumours are true – I am really pleased to announce th

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: You can also check the activities of the packit FAS user in Koji (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=4641 ) or Bodhi ( https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/users/packit

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220505.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Non-responsive packagers: michaelanguskelly

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2022-05-06 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: I don't have a specific agenda for today's meeting, so I'll hold one

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

Hi Miro, that's a really valid point that we should somehow resolve. Is this always the case with the mass rebuilds that they should be left unbuilt or just with your Python rebuilds? I am thinking about multiple options here: 1) configurable allow-list / block list for committers (for the user

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:51 PM Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > that's a really valid point that we should somehow resolve. Is this always > the case with the mass rebuilds that they should be left unbuilt or just with > your Python rebuilds? > > I am thinking about multiple options her

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

Yes, sure. Thanks for the example. František On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > You can also check the activities of the packit FAS user in Koji > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=4641 > >

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 15:50, Frantisek Lachman wrote: Hi Miro, 👋 that's a really valid point that we should somehow resolve. Is this always the case with the mass rebuilds that they should be left unbuilt or just with your Python rebuilds? That is the case for any rebuilds that happen in side tags

Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:17 PM Marián Konček wrote: > > I agree with Vit, I want to add to this: > > * still having to maintain a custom script is not an improvement over our > current situation. > * make sure that $VERSION can be processed, there are cases when for example > the tilde "~" need

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > You can also check the activities of the packit FAS user in Koji > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=4641 > > ) or

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.24)

Miroslav Lichvar wrote on 2022/05/05 0:46: libgps from the gpsd package had an API and ABI break. As usual, the following packages need to be rebuilt: collectd direwolf foxtrotgps marble plasma-workspace vfrnav viking I tried to rebuild them locally. It seems only direwolf needs a new patch. Th

Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0): ID: 1258026 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258026 ID: 1258030 Test:

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > That is the case for any rebuilds that happen in side tags. Most recently e.g. > the boost rebuilds. Sometimes, maintainers do that for their own packages as > well, but provenpackagers do that at larger scale. For Python packages, > that'll

Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 17/231 (x86_64), 35/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 17:37, Frantisek Lachman wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: That is the case for any rebuilds that happen in side tags. Most recently e.g. the boost rebuilds. Sometimes, maintainers do that for their own packages as well, but provenpackagers do that at larg

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 15:50, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > 1) configurable allow-list / block list for committers (for the user > and/or for > > the whole service) > > * For our projects, we would allow just the `packit` user that we use > for > > submi

Fedora-IoT-37-20220506.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64) ID: 1258449 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258449 ID: 1258462 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 5:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 17:37, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > The problem is I have not explicitly opted in yet I am afraid this will > block > my work. Before a more robust solution is found, please at least provide > me a > way how I can temporarily disa

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 18:18, Tomas Tomecek wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 5:54 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 06. 05. 22 17:37, Frantisek Lachman wrote: The problem is I have not explicitly opted in yet I am afraid this will block my work. Before a more robust so

Review request: liblerc

Hi I've packaged liblerc which I'd like to use for the upcoming gdal-3.5.0. Review request is here [1]. It's a simple cmake/c++ library, and I've also added the mingw subpackages. Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662 __

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:46 Miro Hrončok wrote: > supercollider > CMake Warning: >Ignoring extra path from command line: > "/builddir/build/BUILD/SuperCollider-3.12.2-Source" > CMake Error: The source directory > "/builddir/build/BUILD/SuperCollider-3.12.2-Source/build

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 06. 05. 22 19:35, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:46 Miro Hrončok wrote: supercollider CMake Warning: Ignoring extra path from command line: "/builddir/build/BUILD/SuperCollider-3.12.2-Source" CMake Error: The source directory "/builddir/build

Re: F37 Change: Enable read only /sysroot for Fedora Silverblue & Kinoite (Self-Contained Change proposal)

> We could also probably make this even more conservative and have it only > enabled once all > your deployments have the new kernel option. This should avoid the case where > you can not > bee an older deployment anymore. Hello I would like to ask how it will work if I have pinned deployments

chafa-libs soname bump from 0.6.0 to 0.7.1

I'm planning to do https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chafa/pull-request/3 Nothing depends on chafa-libs in Fedora, so I won't wait a week. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To