Why post something that has expired?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Gu
Hey folks!
We're having a look at FMN these days, and we're trying to design its
replacement in our Fedora Messaging enabled world.
The current FMN has the following shortcomings:
- too slow at runtime
- slow at startup time (a couple of hours to startup…)
- complex UI
We think that this all com
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:49 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Why post something that has expired?
Hi leigh, When I shared the email, the giveaway was still active :)
given it was just for 24 hours, It had to expire after some time (This
is mentioned in the blog)
I definitely could have highlighted in t
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:24 AM Aurelien Bompard
wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> We're having a look at FMN these days, and we're trying to design its
> replacement in our Fedora Messaging enabled world.
> The current FMN has the following shortcomings:
> - too slow at runtime
> - slow at startup time
Dne 22. 04. 22 v 9:16 Aurelien Bompard napsal(a):
Hey folks!
We're having a look at FMN these days, and we're trying to design its
replacement in our Fedora Messaging enabled world.
The current FMN has the following shortcomings:
- too slow at runtime
- slow at startup time (a couple of hours
V Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski napsal(a):
> Upgrading NetworkManager-sstp to the latest version, I've noticed that
> there is a failed test related to missing branch protection on AArch64
> [1].
Check annocheck version installed when building your package (root.log).
Hi,
This proposal[1] is to extract the heavier part "tools" from the gettext main
package into a separate sub-package.
Inline with upstream packaging hints[2].
pros: smaller footprint of the gettext main package.
cons: a large numbers of packagers may get affected directly or indirectly.
(may r
On 22. 04. 22 9:16, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
Hey folks!
We're having a look at FMN these days, and we're trying to design its
replacement in our Fedora Messaging enabled world.
The current FMN has the following shortcomings:
- too slow at runtime
- slow at startup time (a couple of hours to star
> Please make it Matrix native. That way FMN can send richer and more
> useful notifications.
Yeah that's maybe the only additional feature we're considering adding :-)
> I also want notifications about CI/CD things happening in PRs in Dist-Git.
If a Fedora Message is sent, as long as the messag
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220421.0):
ID: 1234859 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
> Groups. I want to be notified of what happens on group's artifacts, events
> referring to the group's name.
Good point! So let's say when an artifact is owned by a group you're a member
of, you'll be considered an owner, and notified as such. Would that work for
you?
There's currently no sta
> Not really. However, not sure if the "watch" is counted in this category
> or in the previous.
Right, it wasn't clear. When I wrote "my artifacts" I meant the artifacts I'm
the owner of.
> What belongs into this category? Not really sure.
App maintainers may define in their message and schem
It has it was only valid yesterday
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 1:20 PM Sayak Sarkar
wrote:
> Cool Stuff store says that the promo code has already expired! :(
>
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 08:49, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>
>> I'm getting: There are currently no products linked to this invitation
>> code.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 16:49 Sayak Sarkar wrote:
> Cool Stuff store says that the promo code has already expired! :(
>
Yep it was 24 hrs only.
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 08:49, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>
>> I'm getting: There are currently no products linked to this invitation
>> code...
>>
>> ---
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 13:04 +0530, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:49 PM Leigh Scott
> wrote:
> >
> > Why post something that has expired?
> Hi leigh, When I shared the email, the giveaway was still active :)
> given it was just for 24 hours, It had to expire after some time
>
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or
contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check the post
OLD: Fedora-36-20220421.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220422.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hello folks,
what would it take to allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without
fedpkg?
The instructions at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/pull-requests/#_you_are_not_a_packager
assume they run Fedora (or another distro with fedpkg), but this is extremely
unfriendly to cont
> On Apr 22, 2022, at 6:44 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> what would it take to allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without
> fedpkg?
>
> The instructions at
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/pull-requests/#_you_are_not_a_packager
> assume they run Fedora (o
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:54 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> what would it take to allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without
> fedpkg?
>
> The instructions at
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/pull-requests/#_you_are_not_a_packager
> assume they run Fedora (or anot
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/161 (aarch64), 5/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220421.n.0):
ID: 1235160 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1235160
ID: 1235163 Test: aa
On 4/20/22 17:25, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
Thanks Thomas for the reply. You've given us some good information to
consider/pursue.
Dusty
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
#fedora-meeting: Fedora ELN SIG (2022-04-22)
Meeting started by dcavalca at 16:02:41 UTC. The full logs are
available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-04-22/eln.2022-04-22-16.02.log.h
I'm going to orphan jsoup package.
jsoup is a Java library for working with real-world HTML.
It provides a very convenient API for extracting and manipulating data,
using the best of DOM, CSS, and jquery-like methods.
I am no longer interested in maintaining jsoup in Fedora.
It has outstanding mo
On 2022-04-22 11:01, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski napsal(a):
>> Upgrading NetworkManager-sstp to the latest version, I've noticed that
>> there is a failed test related to missing branch protection on AArch64
>> [1].
>
> Check annocheck version i
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220421.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220422.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 212
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 2.99 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/229 (x86_64), 9/161 (aarch64)
ID: 1235852 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1235852
ID: 1235887 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. selinux-policy — gnome-initial-setup hangs when I try to setup a
google/microsoft online account — VERIFIED
ACTION: none
2. container-selinux — selinux-policy is preventing flatpak from
updating / installing / removing fl
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:45 AM Vipul Siddharth
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:49 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > Why post something that has expired?
> Hi leigh, When I shared the email, the giveaway was still active :)
> given it was just for 24 hours, It had to expire after some time (Thi
In one week (2022-04-29), or slightly later, I will merge and build the
linked PR[1] to update python-opentelemetry from 1.10.0 to 1.11.1 in
Rawhide. According to the upstream release notes [2][3], there are
potential breaking changes.
I will rebuild python-xds-protos in a side tag with
pytho
In one week modello package will be updated in rawhide (Fedora 37)
from version 1.11 to version 2.0.0.
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053953
PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modello/pull-request/4
The new major version introduces API break and packages may need to be
port
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 26/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220421.n.0):
ID: 1236236 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso an
32 matches
Mail list logo
