Fedora-Cloud-34-20220416.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220415.0): ID: 1227970 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220416.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220415.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220416.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36

I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about Fedora 36. I upgraded from Fedora 35 to the Fedora 36 Alpha (at the time). Occasionally when coming out of sleep I get a password prompt from, I believe, PackageKit. Before I filed a bug I was curious if this was a known issue. Thanks!

Fedora-36-20220416.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/229 (x86_64), 9/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220415.n.0): ID: 1228215 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228215 ID: 1228249 Test: x86_64 unive

Re: PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36

On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:23:45 -0400 Mark Bidewell wrote: > I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about Fedora 36. Well, it's a gray area. It is still in beta, final decision is next week. So, you are more likely to get action on the test list. This doesn't seem egregious enough t

verifying signature for a package

Hi, I am trying to pakage oclock for Fedora. According to the packaging guidelines I need to have a gpg key. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification So, the package itself comes with a oclock-1.0.4.tar.gz.sig (from upstream). How do I use this? I tr

Re: Batch updates PETSc-3.17 hypre-2.24.0 superlu_dist-7.2.0

I will push these updates next weekend. On 4/6/22 18:58, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. This is the upgrade of some libraries in Rawhide: petsc-3.17: $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libpetsc*.so*' --source | sort -u bout++-4.4.0-2.fc35.src.rpm dolfin-2019.1.0.post0-21.fc35.src.rpm get

ghex license change from GPLv2+ to GPLv2+ and GFDL and CC-BY-SA

While updating ghex to the latest version, I checked through the included licenses, and found that the user documentation is under GFDL and the icon is under CC-BY-SA, with the sources being under GPLv2+. -- https://amigadave.com/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature _

Re: verifying signature for a package

Please see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/a38f5a42fa7bc59378527cf05dabe29523675613/f/xfontsel.spec#_10 for an example from the same group of X11 programs. Note also that oclock was previously retired, so see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Reti

Re: PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36

Mark Bidewell kirjoitti 16.4.2022 klo 16.23: I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about Fedora 36. I upgraded from Fedora 35 to the Fedora 36 Alpha (at the time). Just to clarify, there are no Alpha releases in Fedora anymore. A new release starts out as Branched, then becomes B