On 12/04/2022 02:24, Mark Otaris wrote:
In the Firefox Public Data Report, GPU vendor is 69% Intel, 13% Nvidia, 13%
AMD, 5% other.
Keep in mind that most advanced Firefox users turn telemetry off completely.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> Am 11.04.22 um 19:33 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 03:37:04PM +0200, David wrote:
> > > On 4/11/22 15:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Ralf Co
On 12.4.2022 00:24, Mark Otaris wrote:
However, the majority of Linux PC users *must* step out of the happy path
to get their hardware working for two cases:
* NVIDIA graphics
* Broadcom wireless
In the Firefox Public Data Report, GPU vendor is 69% Intel, 13% Nvidia, 13%
AMD, 5% other. I don’t
Hi, Scott.
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 05:38, Scott Talbert wrote:
> I'm in the process of updating wxGTK to 3.1.6 in Rawhide. This comes with
> an soname bump. I've built wxGTK 3.1.6 in a side tag, f37-build-side-52676.
Thanks for the notification.
> The dependent packages are:
> CubicSDR ->
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 09:38, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Scott.
>
> On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 05:38, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > I'm in the process of updating wxGTK to 3.1.6 in Rawhide. This comes with
> > an soname bump. I've built wxGTK 3.1.6 in a side tag, f37-build-si
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 03.41.48 WEST Christoph Junghans wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 9:50 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
> > The libcerf package was updated to version 2.1 in Rawhide yesterday[1],
> > which included an unannounced .so version bump from “1” to “2”.
>
> My mistake, I thought I did a
On 4/8/22 14:17, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 6:34 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 4/8/22 12:16, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18
== Summary ==
Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Re
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 145
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 159.65 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220411.0):
ID: 1221787 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1221787
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 17/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
OLD: Fedora-36-20220411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Scott.
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 05:38, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm in the process of updating wxGTK to 3.1.6 in Rawhide. This comes with
an soname bump. I've built wxGTK 3.1.6 in a side tag, f37-build-side-52676.
Thanks for th
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:16:59AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 4.18] release.
> [...]
> > * New `%conf
perl-Config-General-2.65 in Fedora 37 changed its license from (GPL+ or
Artistic) to Artistic 2.0.
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132893
Regards, Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to de
While the autoreconf command is “external,” it does implicitly execute
m4 scripts, often including some that are included in the package source
distribution, in order to generate the configure script. Note also that
autogen.sh is rarely more than a trivial one-to-five-line wrapper around
autore
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 5:12 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Earlier this week, the Fedora Workstation WG discussed a ticket
> > brought to us asking for a GUI-based rescue/recovery environment[1].
> > While we all agreed in
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/229 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220411.n.0):
ID: 1221988 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1221988
ID: 1222010 Test: x86_64
V Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 04:04:35PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:16:59AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Where should autoreconf be placed? %pre or %conf?
>
> For me the important distinction is that %prep should *not* execute the
> code from the package: i
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 6:35 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> > I am not sure about having a full graphics environment, but it would be
> > nice to have the functionality of the server installers rescue mode,
> > where the system try to create a system tree at
Chris Murphy wrote:
> I don't know why anaconda can't run the rescue mode when launched from
> a Live OS environment.
The main thing that is missing is an icon/button on the desktop, I guess.
Though of course Anaconda needs to provide a CLI executable (or a flag to
the liveinst one that is alrea
Hello, a new kind of failure is happening, still on same package and CPU
arch
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=85563318
Maybe an OpenMP bug?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 7:21 AM Marc Pervaz Boocha via devel
wrote:
> There are a couple of things.
> One important but overlooked usecase is offline repartioning. Modifing
> the disk partioning is imposiple on a live disk(maybe with lvm). Its
> nice to to have a equivalent of gparted live availab
Recently I've been messing with the following minimal modifications to
see what happens:
; mount the top level of the fs
mount /dev/sdXY /mnt
cd /mnt
; make a snapshot
btrfs sub snap -r root root.rescue
; modify the rescue boot entry
nano /boot/loader/entries/$(cat /etc/machine-id)-0-rescue.conf
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:42 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I don't know why anaconda can't run the rescue mode when launched from
> > a Live OS environment.
>
> The main thing that is missing is an icon/button on the desktop, I guess.
> Though of course Anaconda need
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:59:01PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 3:36 PM Brian C. Lane wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:21:04PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > Once upon a time, Peter Boy said:
> > > > I want to reiterate, it's not just about cloud platforms! if we
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:20:25 +0200
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello, a new kind of failure is happening, still on same package and CPU
> arch
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=85563318
>
> Maybe an OpenMP bug?
so now it chokes on inlined functions from
src/common/fast_guided
I need three new python packages to update python-pydata-sphinx-theme
to its latest version. Who would like to swap reviews?
python-pep621: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647
python-sphinx-autobuild (unretire):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651
python-sphinx-the
It's been ~1 month and I am still unable to upgrade to F36 due to the same
issue with lilv:
Error:
Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture
- lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686
fre 2022-04-01 klockan 12:14 +0200 skrev Jonathan Schleifer:
> Has anyone seen or knows how to contact hno? hno maintains electrum
> and
> is unresponsive on bugs, PRs and direct e-mails.
I am around. But not very active at the computer at home. Expect a week
or two response time normally.
> H
Your calculations have to be off; I’m pretty sure there are way more than 100
Fedora users with a Nvidia GPU. The Linux Hardware Project alone reports 106
Fedora users with Nvidia GPUs (which is actually 29% of their sample) so that’s
a hard minimum: https://linux-hardware.org/?view=gpu_vendor&d
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 08:21:11PM -, Tom Seewald wrote:
> It's been ~1 month and I am still unable to upgrade to F36 due to the same
> issue with lilv:
>
> Error:
> Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture
> - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MajorUpgradeOfMicrodnf
== Summary ==
A major upgrade of Microdnf is the first step in the evolution of
package management in Fedora. The new microdnf has ambitions to
provide all major features of DNF without losing its minimal
footprint.
== Owner ==
* Name
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_GHC_9.0_%26_Stackage_19
== Summary ==
The GHC Haskell compiler will be updated from major version 8.10 to 9.0,
and Haskell packages will be updated from Stackage LTS 18 to LTS 19 versions.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Petersen|Jens Petersen]]
* Email:
There is a workaround - I ran into this due to running the RPM version of
steam. I removed the i686 lilv (which removed steam) and allowed me to complete
the upgrade. After the upgrade completed I reinstalled steam. All my games etc
were still there; the f36 version of the rpm does not require t
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 21:54, Jerry James wrote:
> I need three new python packages to update python-pydata-sphinx-theme
> to its latest version. Who would like to swap reviews?
>
> python-pep621: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647
> python-sphinx-autobuild (unretire):
> ht
We've got a 300+ message thread in just one week, with 66 different
participants. This handily beats discussions systemd-resolved,
btrfs-by-default, and even switching the default editor to nano.
Clearly there's a lot to talk about here. Would it be useful to have a
high-bandwidth, moderated conve
> Does adding --allowerasing work?
>
> kevin
Yes that worked, thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 5:04 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Taken all three.
Thank you!
> I have the following two python packages up for review:
> python-mrcfile - MRC2014 file format used in structural biology to store
> image and volume data
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
I'm getting:
Error:
Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture
- lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
It looks like it has
On 12.4.2022 20:44, Mark Otaris wrote:
Your calculations have to be off; I’m pretty sure there are way more than 100
Fedora users with a Nvidia GPU. The Linux Hardware Project alone reports 106 Fedora
users with Nvidia GPUs (which is actually 29% of their sample) so that’s a hard
minimum: http
41 matches
Mail list logo
