On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:42 PM Gregory Bartholomew
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:51 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:47 AM Gregory Bartholomew
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I haven't done a "default" Fedora Server installation in a long time, so
>> > I'm not sure how they are la
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:27 AM Colin Walters wrote:
> Or, maybe it's an Anaconda thing to override it?
I don't think so (from Workstation edition installation)
# grep mke2 /var/log/anaconda/storage.log
INFO:program:Running... mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/vda2
INFO:program:b'mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)'
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:50 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Colin Walters said:
> > Ah but with a 512M disk I do get 256 bit inodes, I bet that's the
> > difference.
>
> It comes from /etc/mke2fs.conf... kind of. Below 512M, mke2fs chooses
> to use the "small" config from there, whi
On 4/5/22 15:58, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:18 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>> While this will eventually reduce workload for boot/installation
>> components (grub2 reduces surface area, syslinux goes away entirely,
>> anaconda reduces surface area), the reduction in support burden
Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateLegacyBIOS
>
> == Summary ==
> Make UEFI a hardware requirement for new Fedora installations on
> platforms that support it (x86_64). Legacy BIOS support is not
> removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not supported on those
>
Hi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 6:59 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Current owners plan to orphan some packages regardless of whether the
> > proposal is accepted.
>
> And that is completely unacceptable blackmailing.
>
Blackmail is always conditional. Stating openly that someone is going to
do someth
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jared Dominguez wrote:
> The security of UEFI systems is immeasurably better. Standardized firmware
> updates, support for modern secure TPMs, OS protection from firmware (SMM
> mitigations), HTTP(S) boot support, largely shared and open sourced firmware
> codeba
Those figures are recommended minimums, not requirements. I have a single core
F35 machine which works fine.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 7:39 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jared Dominguez wrote:
>
> > The security of UEFI systems is immeasurably better. Standardized
> firmware updates, support for modern secure TPMs, OS protection from
> firmware (SMM mitigations), HTTP(S) boot sup
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:54 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> Legacy BIOS support is not
> removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not supported on those
> platforms. This is a first step toward eventually removing legacy
> BIOS support entirely.
What is the distinction between "support is not removed" a
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:51 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:54 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Legacy BIOS support is not
> > removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not supported on those
> > platforms. This is a first step toward eventually removing legacy
> > BIOS support entire
On 4/5/22 19:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jared Dominguez wrote:
>
>> The security of UEFI systems is immeasurably better. Standardized firmware
>> updates, support for modern secure TPMs, OS protection from firmware (SMM
>> mitigations), HTTP(S) boot support, largel
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 6:55 PM Jared Dominguez wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:51 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:54 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > Legacy BIOS support is not
>> > removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not supported on those
>> > platforms. This is a
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:59 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 4/5/22 19:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jared Dominguez wrote:
> >
> >> The security of UEFI systems is immeasurably better. Standardized firmware
> >> updates, support for modern secure TPMs, OS protect
On 4/5/22 16:09, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:38 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:15 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>>> We also lack solutions for dealing with the NVIDIA driver in
>>> UEFI+Secure Boot case. Are you planning to actually *fix* that now?
>>> Because we
> On 4/5/22 19:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Apple and Microsoft signing NVIDIA's proprietary driver doesn't at all
> > indicate Apple and Microsoft trust the driver itself. It is trusting
> > the providence of the blob, in order to achieve an overall safer
> > ecosystem for their users.
s/providen
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 9:07 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 4/5/22 16:09, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:38 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:15 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>
> >>> We also lack solutions for dealing with the NVIDIA driver in
> >>> UEFI+Sec
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220404.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220405.n.2
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 150
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.51 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Google has failed me, how do I go about moving an existing build into a
side tag I just created?
Thanks,
RIchard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Co
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Google has failed me, how do I go about moving an existing build into a side
> tag I just created?
>
koji tag-build
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- de
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > Google has failed me, how do I go about moving an existing build into a
> side tag I just created?
> >
>
> koji tag-build
>
Thanks, there's so many options in koji I wasn't sure whi
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:59 AM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 4/5/22 19:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > We either want users with NVIDIA hardware to be inside the Secure Boot
> > fold or we don't. I want them in the fold *despite* the driver that
> > needs signing is proprietary. That's a better us
hi,
could someone kindly tell me if my toshiba l750 machine has EFI support?
i'm blind and efi/bios screens are in accessible.
Majid
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2022 at 6:03 am
> From: "Gary Buhrmaster"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Subject: Re: F37 Change: Deprecat
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 15/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
Forgot to reply to devel :)
On 4/5/22 22:54, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
On 4/5/22 13:23, Ben Beasley wrote:
Thanks for updating these pages.
I noticed that the Flask and Django pages have language like:
Fedora includes a |python3-flask| package that you can install
and import. However, u
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
