No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220402.0):
ID: 1208214 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220402.0):
ID: 1208230 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 01/04/2022 15:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of shipped RPMs.
Third attempt to push it through again? It was already rejected by FESCo.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
d
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220403.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 48.93 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 11:04 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2022 15:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of shipped RPMs.
>
> Third attempt to push it through again? It was already rejected by FESCo.
Actually only the second attemp
OLD: Fedora-36-20220402.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220403.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 33
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 48.94 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-37-20220402.0):
ID: 1209064 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1209064
ID: 1209066 Test: aar
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220402.0):
ID: 1209094 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1209094
Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.1):
ID: 1208263 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220402.n.0):
ID: 1208670 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1208670
ID: 12087
After upgrading to f36, a dnf upgrade resulted in 156 packages to
upgrade, including swtpm. This resulted in the following errors:
...
Upgrading: swtpm-0.7.2-1.20220307git21c90c1.fc36.x86_64 159/315
error: lsetfilecon: (/usr/bin/swtpm;6249a295,
system_u:object_r:swtpm_exec_t:s0)
3. huhtikuuta 2022 20.38.52 GMT+03:00 "Garry T. Williams"
kirjoitti:
>After upgrading to f36, a dnf upgrade resulted in 156 packages to
>upgrade, including swtpm. This resulted in the following errors:
>
>...
>Upgrading: swtpm-0.7.2-1.20220307git21c90c1.fc36.x86_64
>159/315
>error:
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after
the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release
of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1,
2, 3]. Since we are entering the final freeze this week, can someone make
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 10:47:45PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after
the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release
of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1,
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter,
apparently without killing my login session.
I still had a VM from a week ago based on the 1.2 cut, but it was fully
updated about a week ago. This VM
On 4/3/22 16:45, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter,
apparently without killing my login session.
What video device does VirtualBox provide to the OS?
__
On 4/3/22 6:45 PM, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter,
apparently without killing my login session.
I still had a VM from a week ago based on the 1.2 cut, but it was ful
On 4/4/22 10:00, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/3/22 16:45, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the
greeter, apparently without killing my login session.
What video device does VirtualBox
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:52 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
> In particular, this would allow to avoid the many "commit missing patch",
> "actually commit the change",
> "duh" commits which happen after a successful `fedpkg build --scratch --srpm`
> followed by a half-(how do you say this nicely)ed
On 4/4/22 10:09, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
On 4/3/22 6:45 PM, Ian Laurie wrote:
I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized
the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the
greeter, apparently without killing my login session.
I still had a VM f
On 03. 04. 22 23:47, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after the
upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release of F36.
There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1, 2, 3]. Since
we ar
21 matches
Mail list logo
