Non-responsive maintainer check for szeth

Hi all, As per: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ Bug link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068720 Does anyone know how to reach Ivan Savciuc (szeth)? I've opened a bug with NEEDINFO more than a week ago (https://bugzilla.redh

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for szeth

Sorry, adding in CC the maintainer. On Sat, Mar 26, 2022, at 09:49, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > Hi all, > > As per: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ > Bug link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068720 > > Does anyone kno

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220326.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220325.0): ID: 1197241 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220326.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220325.0): ID: 1197257 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: No daemon-reload or restart with %systemd_postun_with_restart

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:07:22PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > > > > That the service is "oneshot" matters for the "restart" part. What > > > > systemd actually does, is queue a "try-restart" job for the marked > > > > units. > > > > Since this service

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220326.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220325.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220326.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 25.88 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: F37 Change: Encourage Dropping Unused / Leaf Packages on i686 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:09 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 6:05 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > (snip) > > > I'll add some context to these. I'm currently the primary maintainer of > three major projects in the VFX stack, OpenImageIO, OpenColorIO, and > OpenEXR. Do we really need

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220326.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220325.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220326.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 32 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.55 MiB Size of dropped packages:1.11 MiB Size

Fedora-Rawhide-20220326.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 7/231 (x86_64), 17/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220325.n.0): ID: 1197345 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso des

Fedora-IoT-36-20220326.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220324.0): ID: 1198133 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1198133 ID: 1198135 Test: x86_64

Fedora-36-20220326.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/229 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220325.n.0): ID: 1197756 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1197756 ID: 1197793 Test