I'm going to rebase libcgroup in rawhide to version 2.0.1, which comes
with a SONAME bump.
condor appears to be the only affected package, and it will need to be
rebuilt. I've done a successful test build in Copr [1].
Thanks,
Nikola
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nforro/libcgroup-2/
> Am 11.03.2022 um 18:43 schrieb Miroslav Suchý :
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module r
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Also related, as far as I know, Neal put great effort into making the
> macros work almost exactly the same on both Fedora and EPEL.
> So I think that statement is incorrect.
(An ancient version of) CMake is part of RHEL proper though.
And, while a lot of work has been pu
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220311.0):
ID: 1170539 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
* Simo Sorce:
> On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 13:52 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
>> > wrote:
>> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by
>> > > Fedora,
>> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
>> >
>> >
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 06:43:01PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
>
> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate
> package.
>
Two problems, one with lilv:
Error:
Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220311.0):
ID: 1170555 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
There are some issues with Open Babel's dependencies:
Error:
Problem 1: package expo-1.18.11-1.fc28.x86_64 requires
libopenbabel.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- openbabel-libs-2.4.1-37.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with installed
On Friday, 11 March 2022 17.43.01 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf modu
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:55:35PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I just realized that the cobbler django web interface is not compatible with
> django 4.0 in Fedora 36. Upstream has dropped the web interface completely
> with cobbler 3.3 and so I've decided to update to that in Fedora 36.
> Howe
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 16/231 (x86_64), 23/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220309.n.0):
ID: 1170638 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso de
OLD: Fedora-36-20220311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Error:
> Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed -
> package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but
> none of the p
Dne 12. 03. 22 v 15:15 José Abílio Matos napsal(a):
On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Error:
> Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed -
> package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/161 (aarch64), 9/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220311.n.0):
ID: 1171116 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171116
ID: 1171229 T
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 3:20 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 12. 03. 22 v 15:15 José Abílio Matos napsal(a):
>
> On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> > Error:
>
> > Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
>
> > libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of
On Saturday, 12 March 2022 15.35.02 WET Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> Why are you suggesting reporting it to fedora-obsolete-packages? The Julia
> package is not obsolete, and the maintainers are acutely aware of the
> install
> problem and are tracking it in the appropriate FTBFS/FTI bugzilla e
On 3/12/22 04:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:55:35PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I just realized that the cobbler django web interface is not compatible with
django 4.0 in Fedora 36. Upstream has dropped the web interface completely
with cobbler 3.3 and so I
On Saturday, March 12, 2022 3:31:23 AM CST Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> The other one with obs/x264 from RPMFusion.
I came across this same issue. Has anyone reported this issue to them?
For the record, here is the error message:
```
Error:
Problem: package obs-studio-27.2.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
On 3/11/22 12:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
>
> d
I just tried it myself, the only dependency errors I got was from VS Code
(Dotnet package dependency errors, I use MS's repos so I'd prolly have to
upgrade it or remove it temporarily) and OpenRGB (Which I don't really use).
So pretty much good on my end!
Le ven. 11 mars 2022, à 12 h 43, Miroslav
On Sat, 2022-03-12 at 10:15 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Simo Sorce:
>
> > On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 13:52 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by
> > > > > Fedora,
> >
23 matches
Mail list logo
