On 2022-02-28 22:23, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/03/01 15:11:
Hello team,
Blender failed to build with enabled FFMPEG support using
ffmpeg-free-devel at the following line:
'''
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.0.1/extern/audaspace/plugins/ffmpeg/FFMPEGReader.cpp:
I
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 4:10 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-02-28 22:23, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/03/01 15:11:
>
> Hello team,
>
> Blender failed to build with enabled FFMPEG support using ffmpeg-free-devel
> at the following line:
>
> '''
>
> /builddir/b
Dne 28. 02. 22 v 22:43 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 25.2.2022 klo 21.08:
Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from
Discourse or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about
following topics:
* Join us for the EPEL office hours every month [Fe
Dne 28. 02. 22 v 18:24 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 07:45:27AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
Previously it was blamed, at least parti
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220228.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220301.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 114
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.91 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220228.0):
ID: 1153628 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 23/231 (x86_64), 20/161 (aarch64)
New failures (sa
OLD: Fedora-36-20220228.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220301.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
* Christoph Erhardt:
> Hi Florian,
>
>> Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in
>> Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them
>> together completely from scratch, without help from i686 RPM packages).
> alright, thank you for clarifying!
>
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:44 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Christoph Erhardt:
>
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> >> Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in
> >> Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them
> >> together completely from scratch, without
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:37 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> So, uh, we sorta forgot about this. Kamil approved this draft, but
> nobody else gave any feedback on it. This topic is still relevant and
> we have a proposed VPN blocker today, so...any more feedback on this
> draft?
I think it's sound
Il 24/02/22 00:25, Germano Massullo ha scritto:
This problem should have been fixed with commit
https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=dda7dab8274991e4a61a97c352d4367f8f815bb9
after checking which Qt version includes such commit, I will remove
xcb.patch [1] and release a new keepassx
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-03-02 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/229 (x86_64), 15/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220228.n.0):
ID: 1153935 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1153935
ID: 1153947 Test:
In the coming months, the Podman container runtime will be upgraded
from v3 to v4. This is a major release [1] that introduces backward
incompatible changes to configuration files and APIs.
The full release notes for Podman v4 are available at [2]. Here is a
brief summary of how this will impact F
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-03-01 18:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
In one week (2022-03-08), or slightly later, we plan to update
abseil-cpp[1] to version 20211102.0 in Rawhide by merging this PR[2] and
coordinating rebuilds of dependent packages into a side tag. This
includes a new .so version, “2111.0.0”.
The following packages will therefore need to be reb
I plan to update the libsemigroups package from version 1.3.7 to
version 2.1.3, which entails an soname bump. The only consumer of
this package (anywhere, not just in Fedora) is gap-pkg-semigroups,
which I will update to version 4.0.0 at the same time. This will be
done in about a week. If all g
On 28. 02. 22 20:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching.
However, 5 weekly reminders are required and I forgot to start this sooner,
hence th
On 01. 03. 22 19:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 02. 22 20:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching.
However, 5 weekly reminders are required a
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-03-01)
===
Meeting started by Eighth_Doctor at 18:03:35 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-03-01/fesco.2022-03-01-18.03.log.html
.
Meeting sum
> I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
> discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
> ...
> Is there really nothing we can do about this?
I think getting https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/pull/294 merged would help
a little, beca
Hello all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for package I created based on hpnssh. That's
a set of patches against openssh to improve throughput performance and
add some features (see https://psc.edu/hpn-ssh-home). It's been around
for about 15 years now and it's in moderately wide usage. I've submit
Hi!
It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed
upstream. At the very least, Chromium on Fedora is vulnerable to the
following:
CVE-2022-0452: Use after free in Safe Browsing.
CVE-2022-0453: Use after
Summary--
Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become
stale as a Fedora installation ages. This kernel's modules are
eventually delete
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:37:38 -0700
Chris Murphy wrote:
> Summary--
> Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
> containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
> updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become
> stale as a Fed
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:38 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Summary--
> Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
> containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
> updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become
> stale as a Fedor
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:24 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> I am surprised that the rescue kernel would give an indefinite hang or
> even just a dracut prompt within a release.
The latter case is trivially reproducible on UEFI, with the failure
being that mounting /boot/efi comes *after* switchroot. A
Hi all,
The subject of setuid came up in a private conversation recently, and to my
surprise we don't seem to have it documented in the packaging guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID#Documentation
"We sho
On 3/1/22 16:02, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
> hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed
> upstream. At the very least, Chromium on Fedora is vulnerable to the
> following:
>
> CVE-2022-0452:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/48 (x86_64)
ID: 1155330 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1155330
ID: 1155355 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1155355
ID: 11
On Tue, Mar 1 2022 at 07:21:14 PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
Tom Callaway, what is the hardest part for you?
Keep in mind Tom is a volunteer and Chromium packaging is not fun. I'm
impressed that anybody is willing to attempt it tbh.
Michael
___
On 3/1/22 19:42, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1 2022 at 07:21:14 PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>> Tom Callaway, what is the hardest part for you?
>
> Keep in mind Tom is a volunteer and Chromium packaging is not fun. I'm
> impressed that anybody is willing to attempt it tbh.
On 2022-03-01 01:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
Thanks! Next step is to remove libavdevice.h from Blender as ffmpeg-free
excluded it.
Scratch result with applied patch so
far:https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83502291
Scratch result with removed
libavdecice.h:https://koji.fedorap
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Me too. I am surprised that the answer is not to automatically
> download and install Canonical’s Snap package; they seem to have
> figured out everything already. Arch manages to do it by having very
> few patches and using the upstream source tarball.
If you think t
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> (Well, technically, I suppose I could attempt to backport them from 90-
> based, i.e., from QtWebengine 6.2:
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=90-based
> or even directly from Chromium upstream, but that is extremely time-
> consuming and n
On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 19:21 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 3/1/22 16:02, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
> > hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed
> > upstream. At the very least, C
On 3/1/22 23:14, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 19:21 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 3/1/22 16:02, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
>>> hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs
On 3/1/22 22:44, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> Me too. I am surprised that the answer is not to automatically
>> download and install Canonical’s Snap package; they seem to have
>> figured out everything already. Arch manages to do it by having very
>> few patches a
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:45:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> And just for the record, this is the current list of packages that FTBFS at
> least since Fedora 35:
>
> perl-Crypt-PWSafe3
>
> If they continue to fail, they will be included in my report in ~5 months.
Upstream has fixed the issue
40 matches
Mail list logo
