Dne 28. 02. 22 v 7:06 Andreas Schneider napsal(a):
On Monday, February 28, 2022 3:45:55 AM CET Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
I noticed in the electron thread that we now have FFMPEG 5.0 in the
official Fedora repos, but this will of course mean that certain codecs are
removed due to legal conc
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220227.0):
ID: 1151733 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Sorry for the delay.
I checked with MariaDB upstream.
https://mariadb.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/118759-general/topic/Sphinx.20SE
The upstream last updated the version they are using ~7 years ago to
version 2.2.6 and since it isn't a very important storage engine, it
might be best to deprec
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 28th
February (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedorapr
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 53
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 52.97 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> Just as with the elimination of 32-bit support
> (both x86, and the upcoming arm retirement)
> there will come a time for moving the baseline
> to x86-64-v2
I do not see the practical benefit of that. Performance-critical software
can and should use runtime detection or l
It makes sense to hand it over to you. I am OK with it.
Does anybody have a guide on how to do so?
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:18 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.
> I checked with MariaDB upstream.
>
> https://mariadb.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/118759-general/topic/Sphinx.20SE
>
1/ Go to the package page:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sphinx
2/ Log in
3/ On top bar go to "Settings"
(next to "Source", "Issues", "Pull Requests", "Stats")
4/ Left column "Give project"
--
Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
--
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022
On 28/02/2022 03:45, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
How are these removed codecs handled in the library?
ffmpeg is a monolithic library.
Can we link an upstream application against FFMPEG in Fedora now and have it
gracefully fail when it tries to access a non-free codec that was removed, or
OLD: Fedora-36-20220227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:11 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 28/02/2022 03:45, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> > How are these removed codecs handled in the library?
>
> ffmpeg is a monolithic library.
>
ffmpeg is a set of libraries. The libavcodec library is a monolithic
library of co
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220227.0):
ID: 1152141 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 28/02/2022 13:35, Neal Gompa wrote:
Fortunately, that's where we can bring value to the ecosystem, as
we're supposed to be capable enough to work with upstreams to fix
broken code
Feel free to start with Telegram Desktop[1]. :-)
[1]: https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop
--
Sincerely
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:39 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 28/02/2022 13:35, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Fortunately, that's where we can bring value to the ecosystem, as
> > we're supposed to be capable enough to work with upstreams to fix
> > broken code
>
> Feel free to start with Telegra
I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
Previously it was blamed, at least partially, on the mass rebuild, but
clearly that should no longer be an issue by now?
I know I can turn them off, bu
I'm writing a simple provides generator. The documentation is a bit
light on detail:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dependency_generators.html
How do I get the version-release of the package currently being built?
At the moment I can only print simple provides like:
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-37-20220227.0):
ID: 1152587 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/115
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 30/231 (x86_64), 27/161 (aarch64)
New failures (sa
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:46:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I'm writing a simple provides generator. The documentation is a bit
> light on detail:
>
>
> https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dependency_generators.html
>
> How do I get the version-release of the pac
On 2/28/22 16:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:46:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm writing a simple provides generator. The documentation is a bit
light on detail:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dependency_generators.html
How do I ge
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 04:26:02PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 2/28/22 16:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:46:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>I'm writing a simple provides generator. The documentation is a bit
> >>light on detail:
> >>
> >>
> >>
* Panu Matilainen:
> On 2/28/22 16:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:46:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm writing a simple provides generator. The documentation is a bit
>>> light on detail:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/ma
On 2/28/22 16:32, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 04:26:02PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 2/28/22 16:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:46:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm writing a simple provides generator. The documentation is a bit
lig
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/229 (x86_64), 14/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220227.n.0):
ID: 1152255 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1152255
ID: 1152284 Test: x86_64 S
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220227.0):
ID: 1152729 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1152729
ID: 1152731 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostre
Did attend this week
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 4:01 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2022-02-28
> # Time: 16:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
>
> Greetings testers!
>
> It's be
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 07:45:27AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
> discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
>
> Previously it was blamed, at least partially, on the mass rebuild, but
> clearly t
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 16:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > So at this week's blocker review meeting, the fact that we don't have
> > explicit networking requirements in the release criteria really started
> > to bite
Neal Gompa writes:
> And we're not the first to offer reduced functionality
> FFmpeg (both Debian and openSUSE do too, so we're in good company
> here).
I don't think that's an accurate characterization of what Debian does.
See
https://sources.debian.org/src/ffmpeg/7%3A4.4.1-3/debian/README.Debi
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:32:12AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:41 PM David Cantrell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 02:59:33AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>Dne 04. 01. 22 v 21:03 David Cantrell napsal(a):
>>One of the difficult things with the Fedora abbreviations i
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:25 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 07:45:27AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
> > discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
> >
> > Previously it was b
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching.
However, 5 weekly reminders are required and I forgot to start this sooner,
hence the retirement will happen tomorrow, i.e. Ma
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 25.2.2022 klo 21.08:
Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from Discourse
or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about following topics:
* Join us for the EPEL office hours every month [Fedora] epel
* It's #FedoraShareYourScreen week [Fedor
The ownership of the 'sphinx' package [1] has been transferred to me.
I've removed access for users 'brandfbb' and 'cdamian' to the package
(both had 'admin' privileges before) since there haven't been any
activity around the package from them for a _long_ time.
I've added user 'hhorak' with role
Hello team,
Blender failed to build with enabled FFMPEG support using
ffmpeg-free-devel at the following line:
'''
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.0.1/extern/audaspace/plugins/ffmpeg/FFMPEGReader.cpp:
In member function 'void aud::FFMPEGReader::init(int)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.0.1
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/03/01 15:11:
Hello team,
Blender failed to build with enabled FFMPEG support using ffmpeg-free-devel at
the following line:
'''
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.0.1/extern/audaspace/plugins/ffmpeg/FFMPEGReader.cpp:
In member function 'void aud::FFMPEGReader::in
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220228.0):
ID: 1153210 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
37 matches
Mail list logo
