OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220214.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220215.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 16
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 118
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.78 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 14. 02. 22 10:34, Michal Schorm wrote:
The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same hash.
I was hit by:
---
Error: Transaction test error:
file/usr/lib/.build-id/34/feaa549462e8818baa0629ce11da344465882b
conflicts between attempted installs of discord-0.0.16-1.fc35.x86_6
On 14. 02. 22 18:14, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/13 22:26:
On 13. 02. 22 13:32, Josef Řídký wrote:
Hi,
first of all, I would like to apologize for the mess I've caused by the
jasper .so name bump in Rawhide. I entirely forgot the side-tag option and
had the old mindset
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220214.0):
ID: 1130248 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220214.0):
ID: 1130289 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi
I've submitted the two packages which are missing dependencies for
review, which I'd appreciate if someone could review, as
mingw-python-requests and mingw-python-OWSLib are currently FailsToInstall:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2053753 -
mingw-python-charset-norma
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:16:01AM -0800, Jan Staněk wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > tl;dr: Why is the Fedora ID server using HTTP communication by default?
>
> Fedora openid is using http because long ago when we started offering
> openid users were 'http://username.id.fedorapro
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:00 AM Rémi Lauzier via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio.
> I have build rust-msgbox in the sidetag and made a pr to update msgbox
> upstream.
> https://github.com/bekker/msgbox-rs/pull/21
>
> I will need msgbox for a future package so please do not orphan it. For
> image-roll,
Greetings all,
Apologies for the late notice on this message. I previously sent it to the
infrastructure list and should have sent it here at the same time.
We will be doing a mass update/reboot this week. We haven't done
one in a couple of months and would like to get all up to date before the
u
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 10:33 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 02. 22 10:34, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same
> > hash.
> >
> > I was hit by:
> > ---
> > Error: Transaction test error:
> > file/usr/lib/.build-id/34/feaa549462e8818baa0629c
On 15. 02. 22 15:31, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 10:33 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 02. 22 10:34, Michal Schorm wrote:
The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same
hash.
I was hit by:
---
Error: Transaction test error:
file/usr/lib/.build-id/34/feaa549
I've realized I've sent this initially to rpm-list-requests and not rpm-list.
Sorry about that.
On 13. 02. 22 14:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey,
apparently some ELF files are identical between Fedora's pypy3.7-libs and
pypy3.8-libs packages.
On Fedora 34, this leads to installation conflict:
E
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 15:46 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 02. 22 15:31, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 10:33 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 14. 02. 22 10:34, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > > > The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same
> > > > hash.
> > > >
Hi,
I need to update libtraceevent libtracefs kernelshark in order to fix
the FTBFS in F36 and F37. This will cause soname bumps for them. I
plan to do it tomorrow for both F36 and F37.
This affects trace-cmd which I am the packager. I thought this will
affect kernel-tools as well but dnf told m
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:52:03PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:50:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:01:39PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I did some quick'n'dirty statistics of how many
Hi Ken,
On February 14, 2022 5:10:41 PM UTC, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I've been researching IMA signing with RPM. This is a new feature in
>CentOS 9 that has not been enabled in Fedora
>
>I'm not an IMA expert, and I don't work on this for Red Hat, I'm just
>an interested user. (In particu
Hey all,
We have no new business to discuss, so this meeting is CANCELLED.
I'll chair next week if we have a meeting.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
Change proposal: Python Dist RPM provides to only provide
PEP503-normalized names
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2746
APPROVED (+6, 0, -0)
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:56 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We have no new business to discuss, so this meeting is CANCELLED.
What about the bug I suggested FESCo consider as a release blocker?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net
___
On 15. 02. 22 19:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:56 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
Hey all,
We have no new business to discuss, so this meeting is CANCELLED.
What about the bug I suggested FESCo consider as a release blocker?
That was not tagged with meeting as it has no negat
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:12 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:56 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > We have no new business to discuss, so this meeting is CANCELLED.
>
> What about the bug I suggested FESCo consider as a release blocker?
It wasn't tagged to discus
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:12 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:56 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > We have no new business to discuss, so this meeting is CANCELLED.
> >
> > What about the bug I
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I also imagine the case where a user no more use their email address and
> that become available to someone else. The new user may easily reset the
> password and gain access to the old Fedora account (provided that the
> old user didn't use 2fa).
Here's an article
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 04:11:49PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Can you try grepping for the literal string:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note
→ https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/f36-notes-leak-all2-4.txt
> > > I was planning to do this myself but I'm not sure how to grep across
>
Hi,
I was discussing containerization and making RPMs more declarative with
Aleksandra Fedorova, and she suggested I ask here and mention Zbigniew
Jędrzejewski-Szmek.
It sounds like there's already some effort to make tasks in RPMs like adding
users more declarative:
https://docs.fedoraproject.
Good day to you all! My name is Steve Cossette, I work in IT for a small
company in Springfield VA (From Quebec, Canada) and also code integrations
in .NET (c# and VB.NET -- working on parting with VB though).
I started using Linux as my main desktop in November of last year after
managing CentOS/
Hi All,
I'm the package maintainer for Lutris that Steve has been in contact with. I'm
unfortunately not qualified to sponsor him myself, so we need someone else to
take him on as a sponsor.
Steve seems quite engaged and capable of figuring things out himself, and
whoever formally sponsors him
Hi,
Chris via devel writes:
> I'm the package maintainer for Lutris that Steve has been in contact
> with. I'm unfortunately not qualified to sponsor him myself, so we
> need someone else to take him on as a sponsor.
>
> Steve seems quite engaged and capable of figuring things out himself,
> and
Thanks for the suggestion Omar. I didn't realize that was an option. I have
filed a ticket to have them added as a packager to co-maintain.
-Chris
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, February 15th, 2022 at 11:52 PM, Omair Majid
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris via devel devel@lists.fedoraproj
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/231 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64)
New failures (sa
Hi,
I need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708 reviewed please.
This is a pre-req dependency needed for new features in the next major
release of Ceph, i.e. Quincy.
Thanks
--
Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 6:49 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708 reviewed please.
>
> This is a pre-req dependency needed for new features in the next major
> release of Ceph, i.e. Quincy.
Grabbed it and left initial feedback.
--
真実
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Branched 20220215.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-36-20220214.n.1
NEW: Fedora-36-20220215.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 17
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.89 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/229 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220214.n.1):
ID: 1131098 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1131098
ID: 1131155 Test: aarch64 Se
On 2/15/22 02:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 02. 22 18:14, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/13 22:26:
On 13. 02. 22 13:32, Josef Řídký wrote:
Hi,
first of all, I would like to apologize for the mess I've caused by
the jasper .so name bump in Rawhide. I entirely forgot the s
35 matches
Mail list logo
