On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:32 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> And I suppose we should really look at disabling builds on mass branch
> day (while it's happening) it never ends well. :)
Should I open a FESCo / Releng / Infra ticket for this, so we can at
least discuss implementing that?
I'm a bit tired o
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 07:44 Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> So, I've updated review-stats container to run on F34 with
> python-bugzilla 3.2.0, but it still authenticate using
> username+password. Is that enough to avoid authentication errors and
> user ban or I nee
Not sure what selinux really is but I think it makes polices based on system
mechanics so nekto or netko the vulnerability scanner can be reversed
engineered to generate custom policies on the fly
Speaking of policy, a politics on the project would be nice
And try to use multi dimensional array
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220208.0):
ID: 1123437 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1123437
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 14:30, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForSDDM
>
> = Wayland by Default for SDDM =
>
> == Summary ==
> Change the default display server mode for SDDM to use a Wayland-based
> greeter rather than an X11-based one.
>
> == Owner ==
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 3:30 AM Jeff Fearn wrote:
> Tl;dr From Monday 28th February, applications making API calls to
> Bugzilla may no longer authenticate using passwords or supplying API
> keys in call parameters. Instead, API keys must be supplied in the
> Authorization header.
>
> Support for
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 98/226 (x86_64), 61/159 (aarch64)
ID: 1122802 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1122802
ID: 1122805 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedorapr
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:24 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 14:30, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForSDDM
> >
> > = Wayland by Default for SDDM =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Change the default display server mode for SDDM to use
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 11:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:24 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 14:30, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForSDDM
> > >
> > > = Wayland by Default for SDDM =
> > >
> > > == S
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 02:54 Adam Williamson
wrote:
The audit described there was done once last February after the policy
> was approved. It does not seem to have been done when F35 branched,
> though (unless the audit turned up no further dormant provenpackagers
> and thus no mail was sent). Ben,
On 08/02/2022 21:41, Florian Weimer wrote:
CFLAGS?=-O2 -Wall -g -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -fPIC
LDFLAGS?=-Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-soname,libscrypt.so.0
-Wl,--version-script=libscrypt.version
Can be easily fixed by changing ?= with +=.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@eas
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20220209.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211213.0):
ID: 1123661 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1123661
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:25 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> It was missed last time,
Now that I've had my coffee I want to correct my use of the passive
voice. *I* missed it last time. Carry on.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Hello, a month ago I opened a bugreport against fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038828
Today I tried to clean up mock build with various command, and at the
end I also tried to delete the content of folder /var/lib/mock/ but I am
still experiencing the problem.
Since i
V Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:53:27PM +0100, Germano Massullo napsal(a):
> Hello, a month ago I opened a bugreport against fedora-review
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038828
> Today I tried to clean up mock build with various command, and at the end I
> also tried to delete the content
the problem was fedora-review not properly supporting tmpfs.
All infos in the bugreport
Best regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http
Sorry for the slow response. $REAL_LIFE has been keeping me hopping
for several days now.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:03:27PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > ocaml-tplib
>
> I think this is the only ocaml one? I can take it.
Yes, it is.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> At least a couple of those sound like something our (Python Maint) packages
> depend on.
>
> I'll analyze the dep chain and come back to you. I know for sure we'll need to
> take python-sphinx_rtd_theme.
Thank you, Miro.
--
Jerry James
http://
On 2/8/22 20:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 02. 22 19:50, Petr Menšík wrote:
>> Is FESCO okay with bundled javascript libraries in similar
>> packages?
>
> FESCo/FPC does allow bundling. See e.g.
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling
>
> This is no different. Exce
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220208.0):
ID: 1123876 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi,
upstream authors of JasPer library have released a new major version. This
rebase will introduce .so name bump from version 4 to version 6.
I am going to rebase the library in rawhide on Friday February 11th.
For testing purposes, you may use the copr build available at [1].
List of dependen
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 04:30:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:53:51PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:28:53PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > > -
The ocaml-odoc license field should be ISC, but has been incorrectly
given as MIT since the package was introduced. The license will be
corrected in the builds I am now doing for Rawhide and F36.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing
Il 09/02/22 08:54, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 07:03 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> Just being paranoid here: do we have any policy / automatism for
>> disabling "power" users (in packager group or like) which have been
>> inactive for long time?
> Yes.
>
> https://
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 20:40, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
> rawhide/f36 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
What does this mean?
> this means
It looks like the recent update to glew 2.2.0[1] in F36 and F37
contained an undetected/unannounced .so version change.
This is breaking vtk[2] and presumably a lot of other things.
I suggest updating the globs in the %files list[3] to keep this from
happening in the future.
[1]
https://sr
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:12 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 20:40, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
> > rawhide/f36 has been completely
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:33:24AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> However, even if Anaconda changes the bug reporting mechanism and asks the
> user to create an API key first, and then provide it to Anaconda, I fear
> that this will have a devastating impact on the number of bug reports that
> we rece
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> That is referring to provenpackagers only. I'd like this to be extended
> to users in packagers group also.
Given that provenpackagers are group
that can do the most potential damage,
that process arguably covers the users
in the tru
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:26:44PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 6:12 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 20:40, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > > --rebase to pick
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:37:45AM -, Raj J Putari wrote:
> Not sure what selinux really is but I think it makes polices based on system
> mechanics so nekto or netko the vulnerability scanner can be reversed
> engineered to generate custom policies on the fly
Well, no. It provides a policy
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:39:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:32 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > And I suppose we should really look at disabling builds on mass branch
> > day (while it's happening) it never ends well. :)
>
> Should I open a FESCo / Releng / Infra tic
Hello,
Looking to get back into packaging as I attempted to somewhat help out a few
years back. I currently help out with alma linux as far as some infrastructure
stuff goes as well. I work as a sysadmin by day as well. I know some python,
shell scripting, and familiar with rpm spec files and
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the
provenpackager group.
Note that
Am I right to suspect that ABRT bug reports are going to disappear for
the foreseeable future?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
Compose of f36 still have glew-2.1.0-11.fc36 maybe we can move it to a
side tag and start the rebuilds
Depending packages (66): FlightGear FlightGear-Atlas
OpenColorIO OpenImageIO SFML amanith astromenace avogadro2
avogadro2-libs blender bzflag calligra cegui cegui06 cloudcompare
colobot ddnet dr
st 9. 2. 2022 o 19:39 Michael Catanzaro napísal(a):
>
> Am I right to suspect that ABRT bug reports are going to disappear for
> the foreseeable future?
>
Nope, we are working on a fix.
Thanks,
Michal
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 17:44 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> I've not seen this kind of auth dance implemented in any software
> other than TV streaming apps, and not bugzilla and not any other
> bug tracker I've come across. So it is not a practical solution
> today, more of a thought experim
On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 20:27 +0100, Michal Srb wrote:
> st 9. 2. 2022 o 19:39 Michael Catanzaro napísal(a):
>
> >
> > Am I right to suspect that ABRT bug reports are going to disappear for
> > the foreseeable future?
> >
>
> Nope, we are working on a fix.
That's great news, but since AFAICT th
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-02-09/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-02-09-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-02-09/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-02-09-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022
st 9. 2. 2022 o 20:37 Adam Williamson
napísal(a):
> On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 20:27 +0100, Michal Srb wrote:
> > st 9. 2. 2022 o 19:39 Michael Catanzaro
> napísal(a):
> >
> > >
> > > Am I right to suspect that ABRT bug reports are going to disappear for
> > > the foreseeable future?
> > >
> >
> > No
At the request[1] of Serge Guelton, who is a package maintainer for
llvm, I have just sponsored Nikita Popov (FAS nikic) into the packager
group a co-maintainer.
Welcome, and thank you for your contributions to Fedora!
– Ben Beasley
[1] https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/521
__
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 17:44:35 +,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" wrote:
Using API tokens over username/password is a good thing from a security
POV, but as you say, the process of creating the token and getting it
over to the client is horribly user unfriendly.
That depends on ypur threat model.
On 2/9/22 14:30, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 17:44 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>
>> I've not seen this kind of auth dance implemented in any software
>> other than TV streaming apps, and not bugzilla and not any other
>> bug tracker I've come across. So it is not a practica
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 05:12:16PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 20:40, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > --rebase to pick up the new branch
This part also doesn't make sense… You can do 'git fet
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2022-02-10 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2022-02-10 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2022-02-10 12
Thank you, all variants work fine.
Now I have another issue with "nfdump" package, probably for the same
reason: a build flag interference.
I use '-fPIC' in LDFLAGS to make "configure" happy:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nfdump/blob/rawhide/f/nfdump.spec#_49
I suspect that this flag presen
På Wed, 9 Feb 2022 05:59:03 -0500
Neal Gompa skrev:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:24 AM Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> > Last time I tried, I couldn't use Synergy and Wayland together, so I
> > use X11 sessions with KDE still. Will this change only affect the
> > pre-login greeter screen, or does it als
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM allan2016--- via devel
wrote:
>
> På Wed, 9 Feb 2022 05:59:03 -0500
> Neal Gompa skrev:
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:24 AM Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > > Last time I tried, I couldn't use Synergy and Wayland together, so I
> > > use X11 sessions with KDE still. W
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:02:38PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>
I guess this doesn't handle the case of the first branched compose of a
cycle right. ;) Anyhow, here is the report against the last rawhide
compose.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220208.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-2022
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> That is referring to provenpackagers only. I'd like this to be extended
> to users in packagers group also.
FWIW, the last time this came up, there was
a vague idea to require a yearly resigning
of the CLA (or something equivalent,
On 2/9/22 10:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like the recent update to glew 2.2.0[1] in F36 and F37
contained an undetected/unannounced .so version change.
This is breaking vtk[2] and presumably a lot of other things.
I suggest updating the globs in the %files list[3] to keep this from
happen
How will multi-monitor users be able to configure the display arrangement for
SDDM now? Currently on my desktop SDDM defaults to an incorrect arrangement and
I have /etc/sddm/Xsetup call xrandr to correct it. With SDDM using wayland by
default will users just be expected to deal with random moni
Jeff Fearn replied to my email, but he only copied the internal
bugzilla-list, because he wanted to include security details and didn't
feel comfortable doing that on a public list. I've selected the most
important parts of his replies and deleted the rest. Please see his
responses below:
On Wed,
56 matches
Mail list logo
