Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 22/01/2022 15:56, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > >Which I presume is related to the failed rebuild of fmt[2] with gcc-12 and > >thus I'm still getting a version of fmt compiled with gcc-11. > > Fmt build failed on ppc64le due

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220124.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220123.0): ID: 850 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:54:02PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > > Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It > > broke multiple packages at the linking stage: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220124.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220123.0): ID: 867 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:32 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. > GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression > and documentation bugfixes allowed) on Monday 17th, so there should be > just those bugf

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Have the command line arguments that are accepted by gcc? > > The test suite of the "cc" crate (used for compiling and linking to C > code within Rust projects) started failing with GCC 12 with this > error: > > gcc: error: un

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

Hi, > > However edk2 has other problems revealed probably by GCC 12, see: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4195/81484195/build.log > > A valid warning, perhaps slightly overzealous depending on how Error is > defined: > > GenSec.c:1065:5: error: pointer used after 'fclose' [

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:01 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Have the command line arguments that are accepted by gcc? > > > > The test suite of the "cc" crate (used for compiling and linking to C > > code within Rust projects) star

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 4:58 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 22/01/2022 17:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The long double change is an ABI change, so this is kind of expected. > > abidiff automatic test found no ABI changes between 8.0 and 8.1. I think you

about abidiff Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Sun, 2022-01-23 at 10:56 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 22/01/2022 17:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The long double change is an ABI change, so this is kind of expected. > > abidiff automatic test found no ABI changes between 8.0 and 8.1. Since early 2021 at least https://sourcewar

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:28 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > >> The long double change is an ABI change, so this is kind of expected. >> Mass rebuild unfortunately doesn't go according to the dependency graph >> (and >> unfortunately it isn't a tree, there are cycles). >> > > Indeed. fmt has not been

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220124.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220123.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220124.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 44 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 26.63 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On 24/01/2022 12:15, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:28 PM Kaleb Keithley > wrote: The long double change is an ABI change, so this is kind of expected. Mass rebuild unfortunately doesn't go according to the dependen

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 07:15:19AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:28 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > >> The long double change is an ABI change, so this is kind of expected. > >> Mass rebuild unfortunately doesn't go according to the dependency graph > >> (and > >> unfo

Help needed updating Lazarus to v2.2.0

Hi all, some time ago, Lazarus v2.2.0 came out. I tried to update the package in Rawhide, but the build failed on ppc64le with a linking error. Link to failed scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81313575 ../units/powerpc64-linux/nogui/project.o: in function `WRPR_

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 05:56:40PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:47 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: > > > > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > It breaks ALL packages using gold to link, and the "fix" is to explicitly > > > add a macro to generate gold-compatible output o

Planned Outage - bodhi.fedoraproject.org - 2022-01-26 12:00 UTC

Planned Outage - bodhi.fedoraproject.org - 2022-01-26 12:00 UTC There will be a partial outage starting on wednesday at 2022-01-26 12:00 UTC which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date

Announcing zimlib and kiwix-lib soversion bumps

Hello all. zimlib 7.2.0 will include soversion bump from .6 to .7. libkiwix 10.0.0 (replaced kiwix-lib) will include soversion bump from .9 to .10. I will rebuild all dependent packages in Rawhide and F35. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Podman 4.0 rc2 is available in updates-testing.

We would love to have people play with this and test it out. Note: this release has breaking changes to it's API, so it will not be released to f35. Only to F36, but users will be able to download and use it on F35, we will not push it to stable though. https://github.com/containers/podman/re

CPE Feedback Survey Q3-Q4 2021

Hey folks, We have been doing the Community Platform Engineering feedback survey for a while now, and we still use the feedback collected to adjust our communications and processes. We would like to hear your thoughts again through a short survey we've put together to learn how your experiences h

Re: Podman 4.0 rc2 is available in updates-testing.

On 24. 01. 22 15:16, Daniel Walsh wrote: We would love to have people play with this and test it out. Note: this release has breaking changes to it's API, so it will not be released to f35. Only to F36, but users will be able to download and use it on F35, we will not push it to stable though.

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 1:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > the problem was that the %_package_note_file macro uses %buildsubdir, > and %buildsubdir is set during %prep, but it seems it only available > during %build and later. So the path was set wrong… I pushed a work-around > to set %_

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2022/01/24 17:55: On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:54:02PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It broke multiple packages at the linking stage:

Fedora-Rawhide-20220124.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 27/225 (x86_64), 23/157 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed i

mass rebuild status - 2022-01-24

The mass rebuild finished early saturday morning. This resulted in 3448 failed builds. This seems kind of high, so we are going to resubmit all the failed builds in a short second round to reduce the chance of transitory issues causing the build failures. It's expected that should finish later

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 1/24/22 05:14, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 5:30 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, So I have an annoying bug that started near the beginnings of F35. My papirus-icon-theme became very slow to install: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029709#c18 During the insta

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 1/24/22 01:30, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, So I have an annoying bug that started near the beginnings of F35. My papirus-icon-theme became very slow to install: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029709#c18 During the installation, all the files are copied, then renamed by rpm

Re: Help needed updating Lazarus to v2.2.0

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:49:27 - "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote: > Hi all, > > some time ago, Lazarus v2.2.0 came out. I tried to update the package > in Rawhide, but the build failed on ppc64le with a linking error. > Link to failed scratch build: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Podman 4.0 rc2 is available in updates-testing.

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 01. 22 15:16, Daniel Walsh wrote: > > We would love to have people play with this and test it out. > > > > Note: this release has breaking changes to it's API, so it will not be > > released > > to f35. Only to F36, but users will be

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-24

On 24/01/2022 19:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: This seems kind of high, so we are going to resubmit all the failed builds in a short second round to reduce the chance of transitory issues causing the build failures. I think the ppc64 GCC regressions should be fixed first. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaits

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-24

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:00:31PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 24/01/2022 19:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > This seems kind of high, so we are going to resubmit all the failed > > builds in a short second round to reduce the chance of transitory issues > > causing the build failures. >

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-01-25)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '202

Re: Help needed updating Lazarus to v2.2.0

I've noticed that this change: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/commit/b00fe0e4e42526afb7a11e9964f8cae49b10da44 which is supposed to fix: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/39295 has been applied only on ppc64. And the only arch which is now failing the build is

Re: Help needed updating Lazarus to v2.2.0

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:51:26 + Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > I've noticed that this change: > https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/commit/b00fe0e4e42526afb7a11e9964f8cae49b10da44 > > which is supposed to fix: > https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/39295 > > has

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-24

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:08:25PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:00:31PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 24/01/2022 19:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > This seems kind of high, so we are going to resubmit all the failed > > > builds in a short second round to re

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-24

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:10:37 -0800 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:08:25PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:00:31PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 24/01/2022 19:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > This seems kind of high, so we are going t

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I took xmlgraphics-common for fotoxx, but if anyone with greater Java knowledge wants it, let me know. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-24

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > Perhaps we could merge today and then do another pass of failed builds > > into f36-rebuild tag and merge that back on thursday or something? > > Can we easily identify those builds that failed due to these ppc64le > > issues? > > it s

Incredible lag of koji notifications

Hey all, I _just_ got an email for my failed job from koji (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81627145). The job started (and finished) on Friday the 21st and yet I just got the email about five minutes ago. Is something going on, or is this a normal amount of time? Thanks!

F36 Change: Podman 4.0 (Late Self-Contained Change)

(Process note: this proposal is well past the deadline, but after consulting with FESCo members, I am announcing it anyway, since it is a leaf package that should have no impact on other developers/maintainers) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Podman4.0 == Summary == Podman 4.0 will be rele

Re: Incredible lag of koji notifications

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 02:44:21PM -0600, Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all, I _just_ got an email for my failed job from koji > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81627145). The job > started (and finished) on Friday the 21st and yet I just got the email about > five minutes ago. Is som

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:41 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 1/24/22 05:14, Chris Murphy wrote: > > What file system is being used in each case? > > > > Everything is btrfs. > > > This is a bit obscure but... cp and mv use reflink=auto. On XFS and > > Btrfs this means it'll make reflinks (

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:44 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Apparently this happens also on ext4 filesystems. :facepalm: haha! ok well then the previous email i just sent can be ignored as it relates to this problem! -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mai

iodine (Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 19:55:17 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > [...] > iodinelystor, orphan 0 weeks ago > [...] I'm using iodine as part of some training material I produce, so I've picked it up. Seems to be low maintenance (famous last words :D) and b

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

Chris Murphy wrote on Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 02:56:09PM -0700: > Should be true, and if this nspawn container is running on the host > then they should share the same btrfs file system. And even if nspawn > is creating separate subvolumes for the mock build (?not sure if it > does) then because it's

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I took pgmodeler Sandro On 24.01.22 19:55, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fed

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Mon, 2022-01-24 at 07:15 -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:28 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > The long double change is an ABI change, so this is kind of expected. > > > Mass rebuild unfortunately doesn't go according to the dependency graph > > > (and > > > unfort

Re: ROCm-Device-Libs packaging question

I created a new review request, hopefully that encourages some conversation on the topic :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044664 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I took perl-Test-Fixme. Paul. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelin