On 1/11/22 17:18, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, at 4:00 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The point was though, that the rpmdb is not at all the only data of this
kind and so having a dedicated home makes sense.
You mentioned dnf/yum/PackageKit data; there's two kinds of that. One i
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:00 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The problem with /usr/something is that the rpmdb is not specific to
> /usr contents at all, and unlike any other content in there, so putting
> it there just *feels so wrong*. That's what /state or /sysimage or, as
> we now have, /var supp
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220111.0):
ID: 1100793 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:36 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> > So by moving the rpmdb to /usr, it's basically saying that `rpm --import`
> > should change.
>
> This doesn't seem to be documented as a dependency of this move...
>
Added.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr#Depend
On 1/12/22 10:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:00 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
The problem with /usr/something is that the rpmdb is not specific to
/usr contents at all, and unlike any other content in there, so putting
it there just *feels so wrong*. That's what /state or /sysim
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
> /opt?
We have three similar locations: /usr (system vendor tree),
/usr/local (admin non-packages
On 1/12/22 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
/opt?
We have three similar locations: /usr (sy
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 1/12/22 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> >>matched /opt, or can there be mix and ma
On 1/12/22 11:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/12/22 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a ver
Hi Aleksei,
that's awesome news! Thanks for the continous work you do.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
This is a bit of tangent, but if I am not mistaken, I can create RPMs to
manage content of my home directory. How folks envision this would work
in the context of this proposal? But I also wonder if this is something
considered by e.g. systemd-homed.
I am asking this question, because move of
Thanks so much for your hard work.
-Joe
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Lis
At the request of the current qatzip package maintainer, Zheng Ma, I
have sponsored Xinghong as a co-maintainer.
Welcome to Fedora!
Regards,
Ben Beasley
On 1/6/22 21:12, Chen, Xinghong wrote:
Hello all:
I’m Xinghong from the Intel NPG-QAT team. I'm very interested in
becoming a Fedora pac
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:24 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Oh, right. More hidden agenda behind this thing. When looking at it with
> these glasses on, it explains quite a few things about the change
> proposal, such as completely ignoring the fact that nearly all packages
> put something i
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:05 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
>> matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
>> /opt?
>
> We have three
Trelby works perfectly with the new version.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, January 11th, 2022 at
I need some Xorg help on epel9. I'm not able to get it load a "dummy"
config that works on Fedora/epel8. Difference in the log is:
- = good (rawhide)
+ = bad (epel9)
_XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not
be created.
-X.Org X Server 1.20.14
+X.Org X Server 1.
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> Traditionally, packages installed all kinds of files all over the place.
> But we're slowly and painfully moving towards the model where:
> 1. packages are only allowed to install under /usr, /var, and /etc.
>(Or under /opt, but I'd want to move that to /usr/op
I have reported this here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039869
Vít
Dne 05. 01. 22 v 11:30 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:25:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
One of the packages which
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:20:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
> > Traditionally, packages installed all kinds of files all over the place.
> > But we're slowly and painfully moving towards the model where:
> > 1. packages are only allowed to install under /usr,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:04 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Here seems to be another SMALL undocumented dependency of this change:
> completing the /usrmove thing to cover the whole world including /opt,
> /etc, /var, and presumably /boot as well because packages put stuff in it.
There are v
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20220106.0):
ID: 1101169 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1101169
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
I wish I had answers for you.
Nevertheless, I'd help if I knew how to debug the detached children
after fork, because they are failing earlier then the main process. I
was using `set follow-fork-mode child` but that does nothing :/
I think that exec or fork is the culprit, in some way.
Vít
So as I already mentioned, the following fails:
~~~
$ ./miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext
-- --disable-gems "./test/runner.rb" --ruby="./miniruby -I./lib -I.
-I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- --disable-gems"
--excludes-dir=./test/excludes --n
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2022-01-13 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2022-01-13 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2022-01-13 12
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:04 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 1/12/22 10:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:00 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> For many practical purposes it's probably just rearranging the chairs,
> >> but a separate top-level directory describing the *system*
Hi, Everyone.
My name is Ali Erdinc Koroglu and I'm a senior linux software engineer on Linux
OS Systems Engineering at Intel.
On daily basis I'm working to provide packages with the latest software
performance optimizations and features enabled for
Intel platforms on CentOS Stream, Fedora and R
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> > matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
> > /opt?
>
> We have thr
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:54 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:36 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >
> > > So by moving the rpmdb to /usr, it's basically saying that `rpm --import`
> > > should change.
> >
> > This doesn't seem to be documented as a dependency of this move...
> >
>
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:03 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:05 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> >> matched /opt, or can there
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:54 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:36 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > >
> > > > So by moving the rpmdb to /usr, it's basically saying that `rpm
> > > > --import` should change.
> > >
> > > Thi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220111.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220112.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 444.03 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 1/12/22 08:18, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
I need some Xorg help on epel9. I'm not able to get it load a "dummy"
config that works on Fedora/epel8. Difference in the log is:
- = good (rawhide)
+ = bad (epel9)
_XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:57:34PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Package (co)maintainers Status
> Change
>
> python-selenium mrunge, orphan
On 13. 01. 22 1:50, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:57:34PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Package (co)maintainers Status
Change
python-selenium
Greetings,
I'm Garry Williams and I recently retired from a software development
job and now want to spend more time contributing to Fedora.
My developer experience started in the late sixties with IBM S/370
Assembler. I had various jobs programming and software support of IBM
MVT and MVS operat
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 8/228 (x86_64), 21/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220111.n.1):
ID: 1101830 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL: https:/
Jan 12, 2022 8:38:22 PM Garry T. Williams :
> Greetings,
>
> I'm Garry Williams and I recently retired from a software development
> job and now want to spend more time contributing to Fedora.
>
> My developer experience started in the late sixties with IBM S/370
> Assembler. I had various job
V Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:18:39AM -0700, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
> I need some Xorg help on epel9. I'm not able to get it load a "dummy"
> config that works on Fedora/epel8. Difference in the log is:
>
Wasn't the dummy driver removed from Xorg (not built by Fedora) in favour of
Xvfb?
-- Petr
39 matches
Mail list logo
