On 09/11/2021 16:06, Robbie Harwood wrote:
They have? What's it called? Asking because I don't see it:
Sorry, my mistake. Only Arch Linux[1] and openSUSE[2].
[1]: https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/electron/
[2]: https://software.opensuse.org/package/nodejs-electron
--
Sincerel
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 12:49 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:59 +0100, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > I didn't install any update, apparently the update is already included with
> > the release version of Fedora 35, because it won't install from the command
>
On Wednesday, November 10, 2021 8:55:53 AM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 08:01, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> > Can you point me to those tons of bundled JS blobs in the source tarball
> > from
the above link please? I don't see them.
>
>
> https://github.com/microsoft/vsco
* Kevin Fenzi:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Kevin Fenzi:
>>
>> > Isn't this an ideal use case for copr?
>>
>> I don't know. I could piece together the Koji API fairly easily, and
>> had hoped to reuse some of the script logic.
>>
>> Or does COPR have d
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64), 1/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211109.0):
ID: 1059304 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL:
> All of them must be compiled from source on Fedora's infra.
No, they don't.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault#Detailed_Description
> Have you tested the build without network access? Because even Flatpaks
> download everything from npm.
"Flatpaks" using fl
Am 09.11.21 um 10:13 schrieb Michael J. Baars:
Hi All,
I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest
Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
Since I use gedit a lot for editing source codes, gedit was one of the first
programs I tried to launch. Now, there
El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 19:01, Sergio Pascual ()
escribió:
>
>
> El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 15:02, Sergio Pascual ()
> escribió:
>
>>
>>
>> El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 14:36, Stephen John Smoogen ()
>> escribió:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you try downgrading to the F34 linux-firmware and see if the f34
>>> kernel
Dne 07. 10. 21 v 17:45 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetiredPackages
== Summary ==
Easy the task of removing packages, which were retired and no longer
receives updates.
Updates:
The change has been approved by FESCO.
The subpackage `remove-retired-packages` is
On 10/11/2021 09:44, Andreas Schneider wrote:
I'm sorry, but didn't we talk about electron and you're pointing to vscode?
My previous message was:
Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and
Debian have already done this), but what about Electron applications
(VS Code for
On 10/11/2021 10:07, Artem Tim wrote:
No, they
don't.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault#Detailed_Description
Yes, bundling is allowed only for sources. You can package all
dependencies in source form into a single vendored tarball.
"Flatpaks" using flatpa
Hi all,
tl;dr: Backups with deja-dup to GDrive require PyDrive2 that requires
some dep updates not available in F35 or F34
The backup software deja-dup[1] can backup to Google Drive using
PyDrive. PyDrive has been archived[2] by Google and PyDrive2[3] is an
active fork. There is a bug in PyDrive
> Yes, bundling is allowed only for sources. You can package all dependencies
> in source form into a single vendored tarball.
OP never talked about bundling blobs, only you. Also OP never talked about
vscode.
> Flathub != Fedora. All Fedora packages must be built from sources (except
> firmwa
Hello Kevin,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Planned Outage - build systems ( koji, osbs, mbs, src, pdc, kojipkgs, odcs,
> registriy) - 2021-11-09 17:00 UTC
[…]
>
> We will be doing several maint tasks during this outage:
>
> All the s390x builders will be moving from t
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
> 1) Notify maintainers of those 5 packages about
> python3-google-api-client update.
> 2) Backport python3-google-auth-httplib2 and python3-google-api-client
> to F35 and F34.
> 3) Add PyDrive2 to F35 and F34.
> 4) Ask deja-dup main
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:57 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Hello Kevin,
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Planned Outage - build systems ( koji, osbs, mbs, src, pdc, kojipkgs, odcs,
> > registriy) - 2021-11-09 17:00 UTC
> […]
> >
> > We will be doing several mai
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 10:12 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG
> (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromium. The
> package could
> be created in a way that you can easily replace it with a version from
>
Hi,
The Fedora CoreOS Working Group [1] is looking to get feedback on how we
share our progress with the rest of the Community. The goal being to help
us understand which communication channel works best and also gather ideas
about things we could try.
Here is a link to our very short survey wher
Now they're back up and running again. I think that when I started the
builds before, s390x did not appear in the output of "koji list-tasks
--mine".
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora
> account system has
> a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or
> Matrix Ids.
> If you do not qualify them, they are assumed to be for the libera
For full details on the problems please see
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10302
synopsis: z15 move failed, we are still on z13?/z14? until next week
or so when this will be tried again.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 06:55, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Now they're back up and running a
looks to me (only?) buildvm-s390x-22.s390.fedoraproject.org is having
issues, so I have disabled it
Dan
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:03:14 -0500
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> For full details on the problems please see
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10302
> synopsis:
On 10/11/2021 11:54, Artem Tim wrote:
Indeed, and they are built from sources on Flathub and that exactly the point.
We can do the same for Fedora.
As far as I know, they just parsing yarn.lock file and downloading
assets. This is not suitable for Fedora.
Keep mislead people and twisting t
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Also Debian have ffmpeg package
>
> you may try :
> dget https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_4.4.1-1.dsc
>
> cd ffmpeg-4.4.1/debian
> vi README.Debian
> etc
Debian has much less strict rules for multimedia patents than Fedora. E.g.,
Debian has always he
FWIW I'm in favor of at least f35.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 10th, 2021 at 4:34 A
Le 10/11/2021 à 11:27, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit :
On 10/11/2021 09:44, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and
Debian have already done this), but what about Electron applications
(VS Code for example)?
By the way, which Electron app do y
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:11 AM Sahana Prasad wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
> avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
> We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
>
Hi all,
FTBFS bugs have been reported for all those pac
On Wednesday, 10 November 2021 at 12:56, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora
> > account system has
> > a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or
> > Matrix
Hi Lyes,
Nov 10, 2021 9:34:17 AM Lyes Saadi :
> Le 10/11/2021 à 11:27, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit :
>> On 10/11/2021 09:44, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>> Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and
>>> Debian have already done this), but what about Electron applications
>
On 10/11/2021 16:33, Lyes Saadi wrote:
I could even imagine someone creating a repo (not in COPR hopefully, due
to legal issues) replacing in proprietary apps like Discord (or Slack
which happens to be relevant to other discussions here) the bundled
electron with Fedora's making things like Des
On 10/11/2021 17:34, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel wrote:
Perhaps this would be appropriate for RPM Fusion?
RPM Fusion doesn't allow network access during the build either.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing li
On 10/11/2021 17:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Be warned that none of the Matrix clients currently available in Fedora
repositories (nheko, neochat, pidgin via purple-matrix) can handle SSO
authentication like the one required to login to fedora.im (Home Server
is fedora.ems.host).
Hi
I'll be updating to gdal and mingw-gdal to version 3.4.0 in rawhide
shortly, submitting the builds in the f36-build-side-47614 side tag.
I'll be rebuilding the following packages:
bes-3.20.8-3.fc36.src.rpm
cloudcompare-2.9.1-15.fc36.src.rpm
dans-gdal-scripts-0.24-16.fc36.src.rpm
gazebo-10.
Nov 10, 2021 10:47:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
:
> On 10/11/2021 16:33, Lyes Saadi wrote:
[snip]
>> Just wanted to add that if Electron is packaged for Fedora, packaging the
>> rest of the electron apps would not necessarily happen in the official repos
>> (due to the enormous work needed
Le 10/11/2021 à 17:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit :
On 10/11/2021 16:33, Lyes Saadi wrote:
I could even imagine someone creating a repo (not in COPR hopefully,
due to legal issues) replacing in proprietary apps like Discord (or
Slack which happens to be relevant to other discussions here
I orphaned PyPAM. It was dependency of Spacewalk and nowadays I do not use it and I am not aware of any other project
using it.
The upstream is dead. And it fails to build with new python.
I thought about retiring directly... but maybe there is somebody who use it.
Miroslav
___
Hi
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:05 PM Lyes Saadi wrote:
>
> (Also, I just want to insist I am not pushing nor advising anyone to do
> something breaking Discord's TOS without their approval, I'm just
> thinking of examples of external demand for a Discord package in Fedora.)
>
https://fedoraprojec
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-11-11 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-11-11 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2021-11-11 12
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:40:32AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Greetings everyone.
> >
> > As you know, we migrated a while back from freenode.net to libera.chat for
> > our IRC networks,
> > and we also migrated to a new account sys
Hi,
I have been trying to create a rpm for gbuffy which I like. However, I am
hitting an error in the install directories.
The program is at:
http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/gbuffy/
Here is my specfile:
# Note that this is NOT a relocatable package
%define ver 0.2.6
%define rel 1%
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:56:33PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora
> > account system has
> > a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or
> > Matrix
> ./mkinstalldirs /usr/bin
> make: ./mkinstalldirs: Permission denied
This sounds like "mkinstalldirs" is not executable, perhaps a simple "chmod +x
mkinstalldirs" will be enough?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
> On Wednesday, November 10, 2021, 02:47:17 PM CST, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> wrote:
>> ./mkinstalldirs /usr/bin
>> make: ./mkinstalldirs: Permission denied
> This sounds like "mkinstalldirs" is not executable, perhaps a simple "chmod
> +x mkinstalldirs" will be enough?
Thanks very much!
Ah!
S
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:46:35PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
./mkinstalldirs /usr/bin
make: ./mkinstalldirs: Permission denied
This sounds like "mkinstalldirs" is not executable, perhaps a simple "chmod +x
mkinstalldirs" will be enough?
It looks like the install target in Makefile.i
Thanks!
> On Wednesday, November 10, 2021, 03:10:43 PM CST, David Cantrell
> wrote:
>This is common practice in older projects. You have a couple of options:
> 1) Patch Makefile.in to honor DESTDIR. Make the install target look ike this:
install: gbuffy
./mkinstalldirs $(DESTDIR)$
My apologies, i spoke too soon.
I updated Makefile.in to be:
install: gbuffy
./mkinstalldirs $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)
$(INSTALL) gbuffy $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)
Here is my updated spec file:
%define ver 0.2.8
%define rel 1%{?dist}
Summary: multiple mailbox buffy for GTK+
Name: g
On Wednesday, 10 November 2021 at 17:50, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 17:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Be warned that none of the Matrix clients currently available in Fedora
> > repositories (nheko, neochat, pidgin via purple-matrix) can handle SSO
> > authentica
Actually, it turns out that the chmod is still needed. Fixed with the following
specfile:
%define ver 0.2.8
%define rel 1%{?dist}
Summary: multiple mailbox buffy for GTK+
Name: gbuffy
Version: %ver
Release: %rel
License: GPL
Group: Applications/Communications
Source0: ~/C.libs/linux/%{name
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 17:50 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 17:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Be warned that none of the Matrix clients currently available in
> > Fedora
> > repositories (nheko, neochat, pidgin via purple-matrix) can handle
> > SSO
> > authenti
Over the next few weeks we're rolling out Fedora Linux 35 to the
`testing` and `stable` streams of Fedora CoreOS. During the Fedora 35
development cycle we followed the Fedora Change process more closely [1]
in order to provide a smoother transition of incoming Fedora Changes.
Current known issues
Hi Yaakov,
Nov 9, 2021 10:22:12 PM Yaakov Selkowitz :
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 03:56 +, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel wrote:
> > Does anyone know if it's possible to set bugzilla.redhat.com to email me a
> > copy of new bugs or comments that I create?
>
> Try: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/us
On 11/3/21 04:50, Zuzana Miklankova wrote:
> I already announced another protobuf 3.19.0 update and rebuild and on
> top of it there is PR open to enable the Java bindings again:
java support has been re-added to protobuf and mysql-connector-java rebuilt.
It looks like java support was dropp
Hi Dusty,
Dusty Mabe writes:
> - cgroups v2 is now the default [5]
> - 64-bit ARM (aarch64) artifacts are now available [8]
> - Raspberry Pi 4 install documentation is now available [9]
> - Switching to iptables-nft by default [14]
What a list! Thanks for all your work on these features that I'
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211109.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-2021.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 321
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-2020.0):
ID: 1060928 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
55 matches
Mail list logo
