No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211106.0):
ID: 1055060 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25:
All builds have finished and the side tag was merged.
Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild
two rebuilds failed:
* qgis
This is recently upgraded grass 7.8.6 packaging mistake which causes
qgis to fail to detect grass, a
> > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the
> > world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta
> > rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with
> > high data expenses. So i feel turning it on by default and having a
> > s
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211106.0):
ID: 1055076 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211106.0):
ID: 1055092 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Am Sonntag, dem 07.11.2021 um 16:48 +0900 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA:
> Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25:
> > All builds have finished and the side tag was merged.
> >
> > Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild
> > two rebuilds failed:
> >
> > * qgis
>
> This is
I think I've found the cause after switching to lightdm.
X.Org X Server 1.20.11
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: 5.12.13-300.fc34.x86_64
Current Operating System: Linux localhost.localdomain 5.15.0-60.fc36.x86_64 #1
SMP Mon Nov 1 15:11:25 UTC 2021 x86_64
Kernel command
IQmol isn't compatible with openbabel3. Latest 2.15.0 release (compiled
in Fedora) is missing in upstream's repository (but available for
Windows/Mac, Linux abandoned?)
On 11/6/21 14:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
side-tag: f36-build-side-47471
On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
O
Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf
3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made.
All builds have finished and the side tag was merged.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211107.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 133
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:165.84
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 111/206 (x86_64), 65/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not faile
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:38:00PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf
> > > 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to t
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 00:16, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
>
> It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world
> where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a
> lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data expenses.
> So i
I just upgraded to F35 and I'm trying to build a package via mock and I'm
getting the following error:
/usr/bin/python3: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found
(required by /var/tmp/tmp.mock.lxb87ex8/lib64/nosync.so)
Does it just need a rebuild or something?
Thanks,
Richard
___
On 11/7/21 01:14, Rajeesh K V wrote:
Deltarpm did
reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007
I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.
I've read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I
wonder what changed between the ea
On Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:58:56 -
"Leigh Scott" wrote:
> I think I've found the cause after switching to lightdm.
>
[snip]
>
> I've found nothing provides /usr/lib64/dri/simpledrm_dri.so
I don't have that file (on rawhide) and my system boots fine with
my custom compiled 5.15.0-60.fc36.x86_64
On Saturday, November 6, 2021 11:15:00 PM CST Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world
> where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a
> lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data
> exp
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 15:24 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
> 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
> openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
> below
>
> Failed op
Thanks for your investigations.
I will do like you , build a custom kernel.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211107.0):
ID: 1055780 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
20 matches
Mail list logo
